Western Canada's Hunt for the Grail...Offender Style!

R

Rakster

Member
Well here's to Teuf'... :beer:

I put together his string of numbers and came up with our future list of plays for this week... Well here goes...

1)....91830
2)....80701
3)....79672
4)....68513
5)....57424
6)....46355
7)....35286
8)....24197
9)....13048
10)..02969

I looked over tonights number... 918... last night 370... no repeats... so this tells me that either a 3-7-0 should be in the mix tomorrow.... also I am gonna try incorporating the 918 in as well b/c we may see another repeat offender.... so looking thru the matrix chart, I find 3 possible combinations as to which set should produce the winning combination...
1 and 2 (6 number rotation)
8 and 9 (8 number rotation)(56 combinations)
9 and 10.. now which one to choose...(8 number rotation) but not taking this one as no 7 in the mix....while the other 2 sets have most #'s I am looking for...
I want to eliminate at least 1 and possibly 2 numbers from group 2 ... any ideas? 56 combo's is not worth the risk... even 35 is almost too high... what can I do?
Thanks guys and good luck!
 
T

Teufellj

Member
I was noticing that on some Saturdays rather than all Sundays, making a rundown produced better results. The sets are the same except that one extra digit in the Saturday gave my setup a solid nine days of wins. I'll have to check this out further with four other states that I produce constructs in. I'm especially interested in Lousiana, so we'll see what turns noses...Hahaaa!
Another small program that works well with my Pointer Matrix uses HHH_TTTT_CCC. What you do is use three Hot digits, four Transient or middle of the road digits and three Cold digits. You make your own combo's and pick the sets that you believe will be played.

Teufellj...
 
R

Rakster

Member
Damn.. the one game I elimminate first is the one that had the winner (9 and 10)... will have to run this again... and take a better look.
 
T

Teufellj

Member
Here's another bit to help you track down a potential win...

GO TO THE SAME DAY ONE WEEK BACK---DO A ROLL DOWN---AND SEE WHAT MATCHES FOR THAT NIGHT'S PLAY!

Example of "Roll Back..."

101
090
989
878
767
656
545
434
323
212...

Teufellj...
 
R

Rakster

Member
Well I must tell you, there have been a few hits using the numbers I posted for this week.
1)....91830 (139)(030 in here too)(370)
2)....80701

3)....79672
4)....68513 (566)(918)

5)....57424
6)....46355

7)....35286
8)....24197 (649)(918 in here too)

9)....13048
10)..02969 (030)(918 in here too)

2 numbers all week that didn't hit... 955 and 503.
One key that I noticed was the hottest 2 numbers in the past month have seemed to generate the lines with the winners. These two numbers were 3 and 9.... They were involved in EVERY winner this past week.... maybe a way of narrowing down the playing field.... as it involved 5 groups instead of all 10 presented in here... all contributed to the winners for the week.
 
R

Rakster

Member
The only problem with all these sets... only 1 has 6 numbers for rotating.. the others have 8, 8 and 9... gotta hit when you get that many numbers to choose from. Gonna have to narrow this down some how and still make some cash on em'.
 
T

Teufellj

Member
WTG, Rakster!
You are catching on to the drift of things. More fine tuning over the rough draft is forth coming, either by you or by others or myself. As soon as I see a five (5)...I stop playing maybe one or two days. I havn't looked very hard but there is one other number that begs attention by the fact that it too won't play into the scheme. When this occurs, you can bet on at least one more
(5) as a rule of thumb. Yes, there is a way to counteract but it is more time consuming than to wait it out and take a mental breather. One thing to learn is, "How to walk away when the damned numbers just don't cooperate." During this "breather," I get notions on different ways to manipulate the same problems that I am working on. Trying too hard is worse and very frustrating.
Also, during this time, I make small and fewer bets or change games for a day or two---sort of a feeling out the territory as I get better acquainted with the playing field then, back to the attack. While I am on vacation from the working schedule, I always ask my self---"What didn't I do? What can I do better? Did I put too much emphasis on a portion of the problem and maybe not enough somewhere else? Maybe I shouldn't have done anything? Is any part of the work in preceeding weeks play? Then, I look back either for single sets or a whole week of rundowns that are formed by each set that do give a part of this weeks work and How?
If you havn't noticed, Rakster, a full week of your game wins, can be further reduced into...daily constructs...as I have shown you. When you have a full working week setup, you will see that each days win will have...two digits over a single number or all three digits on one line or you will have,,,one digit over two numbers of the days winning set. If you think past the numbers as numbers and see how they are positioned, you will begin to notice a...PATTERN. Two up and one down, next day can be in the same slots or they will appear in parallel to the bottom single digit. If the single digit is on top of the two numbers from that days win---the winner will come in in a straight line or in the opposite direction...two numbers over one digit...the following day and so on. Picture a business graph line (like a bolt of lightening) rather than numbers and you will get my point. After a time this will become second nature and you will not have to think what to do. You will see it for yourself. You have just learned how to tidy up your thinking rather than have the clutter that you are experiencing now!!!!

Teufellj...
 
T

Teufellj

Member
Rakster, a graph is the nearest that you can come to predicting an outcome of events that (in your case) you can actually see. It is not far fetched to be able to semi-know how a certain thing will or should react in different circumstances. When they (predicted wins) don't go by the prescribed way taht you have set in motion, then you have other interferences to reckon with. Eg., ball change or programmer piddling, maybe a blackout and one of the mucketymucks just gives a winning set to be shown after the fact; possibly you made an error and didn't realize it until a later time; you ran short of time and bought some 'QP's; or you may have not registered the thought about the ...5's...but you won't do that, right? I have...many times!

Good harvesting, bud,

Teufellj...
 
R

Rakster

Member
Thanks Teuf... been following this all week and have seen it to be the most successful so far of all systems I tested.
 
R

Rakster

Member
Teufellj said:
Rakster, a graph is the nearest that you can come to predicting an outcome of events that (in your case) you can actually see. It is not far fetched to be able to semi-know how a certain thing will or should react in different circumstances. When they (predicted wins) don't go by the prescribed way taht you have set in motion, then you have other interferences to reckon with. Eg., ball change or programmer piddling, maybe a blackout and one of the mucketymucks just gives a winning set to be shown after the fact; possibly you made an error and didn't realize it until a later time; you ran short of time and bought some 'QP's; or you may have not registered the thought about the ...5's...but you won't do that, right? I have...many times!

Good harvesting, bud,

Teufellj...
Click to expand...
How do you graph this?
 
T

Teufellj

Member
Grapg Setup for Rakster/ WCLC Pick 3...

Rakster, this is a generalized graph for the WCLC-2/18 thru 2/24:

Graph Setup for Rakster…EXAMPLE:

31988-0..../...../..xxx./....../..../....../
64420-9..../...../......./....../..../....../
00876-8..../...../......./....../..../....../
19977-7...x/..xx/......./..x../..x./....../
65554-6..xx/...x/......./.xx./.xx./...x./
33221-5...../...../......../...../...../.xx./
..........4...../...../......../...../...../....../
..........3..../..../........./...../...../....../
..........2...../..../......../...../...../....../
..........1...../..../......../...../...../....../
...........mon/tue/wed/thur/fri.../sat./
...........649./566/139/955/030./521./

Here you see how the sets were positioned per the setup on day-by-day calls!
*Tuesday was not in setup---go to the week before on Tuesday and use that positioning
for this week; do the same for Friday!* The WCLC does NOT always indicate
by position of the set flow which way it will travel for the next day but by observation
with this same setup, you can get a good feel for what direction to look by comparing the
other two weeks plottings per day. Plus, with your singularity findings for single digits;
comparing other ways of finding a win (eg., girl friends method/s; whatever fits the need).

Teufellj…:agree:
 
R

Rakster

Member
Another hit on the board with todays 019.
I took it back one day so instead of Sunday to Sunday... I did a check on Saturday to Sunday and used Sundays number for the new set up... there was a hit every day this week... 3 doubles called aad all three of them would have hit too. Thanks for theinput Teuf.
I found that eliminating the 5th row of a rundown didn't cause any harm. So I am running 4 columns of 4 numbers to set my groups at 8 numbers per group, and not counting double numbers in the set up. Then play the doubles seperate once I got my pick in order.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sidebar

Top