Useless numbers for 2174

peter

Member
nipsirc said:
You're absolutely correct on this. USELESS !!!

The post itself is useless!
Well lets take a vote, All in favor of continuing this thread, speak up, those against, speak out.
Your latest contribution Nipper was what????? plse remind me :confused:
 

nipsirc

Member
peter said:
Well lets take a vote, All in favor of continuing this thread, speak up, those against, speak out.
Your latest contribution Nipper was what????? plse remind me :confused:

Remind you?

Why, you should know since you're one of the Top Players:sick: here as you claimed..... and your info are all winners and have won lots of money for everyone who uses it :lol: :lol:

I'll leave it at that :lol: I do not want to brag, remember??? Besides, I do not want to poke my nose in everyone's business like you always do....

You're a winner, right???

:wavey:;)
 

peter

Member
Your a waste of my time:dang: he who has to post so large, due to his ego size.
So far your contributions have added up to a pile of s**t, keep on posting.froggy., my mushrooms,can use the :cow: dung.
 

gsobier

Member
:lol::rolling::lol:
peter said:
Your a waste of my time:dang: he who has to post so large, due to his ego size.
So far your contributions have added up to a pile of s**t, keep on posting.froggy., my mushrooms,can use the :cow: dung.
 

hot4

Member
peter said:
Well lets take a vote, All in favor of continuing this thread, speak up, those against, speak out.
Your latest contribution Nipper was what????? plse remind me :confused:

I think your new theory is competing with nipsirc filters :lol: ; remember those not to play.

Last draw your 17 numbers hit 1. That's 100% better than expected. You MUST go on Peter, if you need my opinion.
 

peter

Member
Thxs for the vote of confidence Frank.
I'm not saying I have the answers, I'm just trying to share an idea, and see where it goes.:agree2:
 

hot4

Member
Good Peter. But if George likes your idea (let's call it "The tenth announcers", George like this word a lot!), he can check back and give you an idea of that in past 20 draws ... let me guess...in a glance
 

peter

Member
hot4 said:
I think your new theory is competing with nipsirc filters :lol: ; remember those not to play.

Last draw your 17 numbers hit 1. That's 100% better than expected. You MUST go on Peter, if you need my opinion.
Frank, you would be better off to use my useless picks as filters, and use the frogs filters as picks, his filters seem to hit better than his picks.:lol:
 

peter

Member
It has been doing well George, no one talked about it, so I assumed no one was interested, I however, am still charting this.
 

gsobier

Member
Peter:

Keep an eye on it... ...I'm deep into some other interesting things... ...there is much still to do... ... when I confirm my results you'll be in the loop:D.

Regards,
George:)
peter said:
It has been doing well George, no one talked about it, so I assumed no one was interested, I however, am still charting this.
 

peter

Member
gsobier said:
Peter:

Keep an eye on it... ...I'm deep into some other interesting things... ...there is much still to do... ... when I confirm my results you'll be in the loop:D.

Regards,
George:)
:agree2: :agree2: :agree2: :wavey:
 

Sidebar

Top