Re: Re: FAT vs. NTFS
Actually the most important difference is that NTFS is journaling filesystem so it keeps a log of all the operations being performed and still to perform. This gives it a high level of fault tolerance.
Read more about it here!
gsobier:
I usually use lilo because I use to it and I find it easy to configurate! GRUB should be greatest thing but I haven't had the time to look at it! Why mess with what works?
I have been dual booting linux/windows since I can remember... never had any serious problems! The main problem was when windows changed to the NT family but even that was easily solved after a web search!
These days I tend to keep more on the windows side with cygwin helping me out, but I still have the dual boot and sometimes I use an emulator to boot up linux on top of windows!
In fact one can for example use the Damn Small Linux embedded distro to have a look at linux running in top of windows!!
Here's a link!
tomtom said:The most significant differences between them are file access and security while connected to a network, in my opinion.
Actually the most important difference is that NTFS is journaling filesystem so it keeps a log of all the operations being performed and still to perform. This gives it a high level of fault tolerance.
Read more about it here!
gsobier:
I usually use lilo because I use to it and I find it easy to configurate! GRUB should be greatest thing but I haven't had the time to look at it! Why mess with what works?
I have been dual booting linux/windows since I can remember... never had any serious problems! The main problem was when windows changed to the NT family but even that was easily solved after a web search!
These days I tend to keep more on the windows side with cygwin helping me out, but I still have the dual boot and sometimes I use an emulator to boot up linux on top of windows!
In fact one can for example use the Damn Small Linux embedded distro to have a look at linux running in top of windows!!
Here's a link!
