I haven't been here in a long time. However, I have something to throw out for general discussion. It may be that lottery softwares are very poor at suggesting picks for the next draw, because the next draw is actually a post test and/or a pretest. The recommended numbers are not predicting the next on air lottery draw. Anybody else out there thinking along my lines? Jennifer
Test runs and lottery software predictions
- Thread starter Iamswamee
- Start date
Welcome Back Jennifer...
Sometimes programs are good and then they are not... Predicting Numbers is not a easy task... We try to predict the winnings numbers every draw...
Hope you stick around
If you call them.. They will come!
Sheba__
~~~
Everybody's Got a Dream...JACKPOT!
------------------------------------------------------------------
Sometimes programs are good and then they are not... Predicting Numbers is not a easy task... We try to predict the winnings numbers every draw...
Hope you stick around
If you call them.. They will come!
Sheba__
~~~ Everybody's Got a Dream...JACKPOT!
------------------------------------------------------------------
lottoweave
Member
we are not God.
I think the lotto game is random phenomenon. No one is God, How to know what the next winning is?
We can study the lotto game and find out some law of lotto game , then we can narrow the range of choosing.
I think the lotto game is random phenomenon. No one is God, How to know what the next winning is?
We can study the lotto game and find out some law of lotto game , then we can narrow the range of choosing.
Re; pretest/post test
Shirazbai,
I just came upon the protocols for the lotteries and how they assure themselves that the draws are random. I found the info on Powerball and Lotto plus (Calif). I had been struggling with why the lottery software I had was so poor at projecting numbers to be drawn. And as I read the protocols it discussed that random draws occurred before and/or after the "real" draw. So, the numbers suggested by my software are for the next draw. And we do not know what the next draw's numbers were as they are not televised. This will be a problem inherit in any predictive lottery software. So, I am throwing out the suggested picks and looking at other predictors. I use the suggested picks to rule out numbers to choose. GH's software at most gets 2 out of 5 and an occassional 3 out of 5. However. she also has a lot of numbers to suggest, such as 10 or 12. So, if I can pick 12 or more possible numbers, I could get 2 out of the 5. But, then she has 10 numbers +- that are wrong. But, maybe they aren't wrong! We don't know what are truly the next numbers drawn...
I am pondering this. Just another piece of the puzzle....Jennifer
Shirazbai,
I just came upon the protocols for the lotteries and how they assure themselves that the draws are random. I found the info on Powerball and Lotto plus (Calif). I had been struggling with why the lottery software I had was so poor at projecting numbers to be drawn. And as I read the protocols it discussed that random draws occurred before and/or after the "real" draw. So, the numbers suggested by my software are for the next draw. And we do not know what the next draw's numbers were as they are not televised. This will be a problem inherit in any predictive lottery software. So, I am throwing out the suggested picks and looking at other predictors. I use the suggested picks to rule out numbers to choose. GH's software at most gets 2 out of 5 and an occassional 3 out of 5. However. she also has a lot of numbers to suggest, such as 10 or 12. So, if I can pick 12 or more possible numbers, I could get 2 out of the 5. But, then she has 10 numbers +- that are wrong. But, maybe they aren't wrong! We don't know what are truly the next numbers drawn...
I am pondering this. Just another piece of the puzzle....Jennifer
Re: Re; pretest/post test
Yes, they are indeed random. So far so good.
This is where the lotteries go their separate ways. I have not heard of any such practice with any of our (Canadian) lotteries and I doubt I ever will. That is really quite deceiving. I am going to assume that Calif. Lottery does not publish the results of those in-between draws. That really messes up the draw database! Not only will any software be useless in predicting future draws, but with such a useless database, where you're only getting one third of the data, you yourself would be unable to form any valid patterns.
That lottery is a scam! I honestly wouldn't waste any money, let alone grey matter on it.
Good luck Iamswamee.
Iamswamee said:
Yes, they are indeed random. So far so good.
This is where the lotteries go their separate ways. I have not heard of any such practice with any of our (Canadian) lotteries and I doubt I ever will. That is really quite deceiving. I am going to assume that Calif. Lottery does not publish the results of those in-between draws. That really messes up the draw database! Not only will any software be useless in predicting future draws, but with such a useless database, where you're only getting one third of the data, you yourself would be unable to form any valid patterns.
That lottery is a scam! I honestly wouldn't waste any money, let alone grey matter on it.
Good luck Iamswamee.
Pre/Post test
shirazbai,
I suspect that the Canadian lotteries also follow protocols. I bet if you called the headquarters that they would provide you with the drawing protocol information. I always believe that there is the possibility to move mountains. I think maybe a different type of statisitcal anlysis would be appropriate. It has been years since I did statistical analysis, so I am going to need to do some research. Like I said, I love solving puzzles. Jennifer (Iamswamee)
shirazbai,
I suspect that the Canadian lotteries also follow protocols. I bet if you called the headquarters that they would provide you with the drawing protocol information. I always believe that there is the possibility to move mountains. I think maybe a different type of statisitcal anlysis would be appropriate. It has been years since I did statistical analysis, so I am going to need to do some research. Like I said, I love solving puzzles. Jennifer (Iamswamee)
Iamswamee said:
Yes, Iamswamee, Canadian lotteries also follow protocols. The only protocol I am aware of though is two sets of balls and a random choice (at draw time) of which set gets used. That protocol alone is bad enough to mess up the data. Adding "phantom" draws would be .... well, let's just say I would then rather just buy scratch tickets.
Pre/post test
One thing to think about is to pick numbers not chosen by software. With GH's I can go back drawing after drawing and see what was predicted and what was drawn. This is how I found out how unreliable her "best picks" were. But, I think knowing what not to pick can be beneficial. There are other anomalies in her stats that I found troubling. Her last digit analysis for sure is not correct. I found that her totals for 60 drawings - 60 last digits- were off. She had more last digits than could be drawn. Huummm. Jennifer
One thing to think about is to pick numbers not chosen by software. With GH's I can go back drawing after drawing and see what was predicted and what was drawn. This is how I found out how unreliable her "best picks" were. But, I think knowing what not to pick can be beneficial. There are other anomalies in her stats that I found troubling. Her last digit analysis for sure is not correct. I found that her totals for 60 drawings - 60 last digits- were off. She had more last digits than could be drawn. Huummm. Jennifer
lottoweave
Member
we can find out the characteristic of winning draw.
We can study the past winning draws. and we can find out the Characteristic of the past draws, such as sum of draw, even-odd. We can find that the winning draws don't appear all rang. so we can narrow the range of choosing.
We can study the past winning draws. and we can find out the Characteristic of the past draws, such as sum of draw, even-odd. We can find that the winning draws don't appear all rang. so we can narrow the range of choosing.