Brad said:when 2 beer buddies get together ... well you know the rest![]()
To get back on topic here: if I hear that " ... All It Takes Is A Toonie! ... " thingy o n e_ m o r e_ t i m e today I'll throw something at the TV, I swear!!![]()
..I CAN'T STAND IT!!! 

Something else has been bugging me about the above statement ... wasn't untill now that I realized how offensive it really is.Brad said:quote from link:
"We think this move in the long run will make this game a lot more relevant to the new generation of Canadians because they're interested in bigger jackpots," said Atlantic Lottery Corp. spokesman Robert Bourgeois.
Adjective: ' bourgeois ' being of the property-owning class and exploitive of the working class
Shouldn't make fun of names but I could not resist![]()


...
Karnac said:It looks like the downward spiral is continuing....Sales for Wed. draw of $13,190,296 were their lowest since the price increase.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
cleopatra said:I also haven't played the national 6/49 since the price increase. The provincial lottery is only $0.50 per ticket.
I think it is a bad move putting all the winnings at the top. That $5 prize is practically an insult. If they wanted to raise the prices AND increase sales, I think they should have done this:
1) Raise price to $1.50/ticket.
2) Make top prize $3 million, then roll over to $7 million if no one wins, then $12 million, $18 million, and then $25 million.
3) Make 3 match ticket 50% higher ($15)
4) Make 4 match ticket 50% higher (about $100), and so on, i.e, make all prizes 50% higher.
I really think this would have increased sales. I wouldn't mind paying 50% more if ALL prizes went up 50%.
