Skip Elimination system

This post is specially for Icewynd:

Hello Icewind:

Nice to talk with you again.

I have read in a old post of you ,that you were working in eliminate numbers based in skips .

Perhaps I´m wrong,but if is true,can you tell me anything about this system for eliminate some numbers?.

A lot of thanks.:thumb:

P.D.I hope all is allright for our friend PAB
 

Icewynd

Member
Hi Sangoma,

Nice to see you again.

I also miss PAB. Hopefully he will pay us a visit soon.

Yes, I have had some success with my number elimination strategy, but it requires patience and resolve to stick to the course. When it works, its great, but when it doesn't work it can give some truly horrible results.

Basically the 'trick' is to only keep the numbers with low skips. I group my numbers by skips of 4 or less, skips of 5-10 and skips of 11 or greater.

If you eliminate the latter group (11+), you will capture the group containing all 6 winning numbers about 30% of the time and 5 of the winning numbers an additional 40% of the time. You will virtually always be guaranteed 3 of the winning numbers. This system will still leave you with an average of 40 numbers to play, but that is still better than 49!

A more aggressive way to play is to eliminate all but the numbers with skips of 4 or less. This reduces your number pool to 26 numbers on average, but this method requires more patience for wins. You will trap all 6 winners in your set about 2% of the time, and 5 of the winning numbers about 12% of the time. You will have 3 or more of the winning numbers about 72% of the time. But when a draw with all low skips comes along you will be in good shape to capture the winning numbers.

Hope this helps.

Good luck!
:thumb:
 
Hello Icewynd:

You, so nice and obliging as always.

It is a pleasure to speak with you.:agree:

Unfortunately, I am thinking about not being able to use this method, because I have looked at the skips of the last numbers that I have matched lately, and almost they all have got + 11 skips, or less than 4.

Anyhow, many graces for your interest.

It will be necessary to continue looking for effective more succees strategie. (though it is possible that this strategy does not exist)

Thank you very much and Regards.:thumb:
 

Icewynd

Member
sangoma123 said:
Hello Icewynd:

You, so nice and obliging as always.

It is a pleasure to speak with you.:agree:

Thanks, Sangoma!


sangoma123 said:
Unfortunately, I am thinking about not being able to use this method, because I have looked at the skips of the last numbers that I have matched lately, and almost they all have got + 11 skips, or less than 4.

Well, my method would keep the skips of 4 or less, but I would eliminate the high skips. I would think that if you have been getting a lot of high skips, it may be time for the low skips to start playing.

This method certainly isn't perfect, so please let us know if you come up with something better.

Good luck,
:thumb:
 
Icewynd said:
This method certainly isn't perfect, so please let us know if you come up with something better.

Good luck,
:thumb:

O.K.Although for the present time, I do not have intention of investigating very much this topic of the skips, to eliminate numbers.

A little thing Icewynd, if you eliminate the skips of +11, think that you can eliminate numbers of the strategy "side+side", that you know very well...:laughing:

Regards:thumb:
 

Sidebar

Top