Side By Side Stratedgy

fullhouse

Member
Hi, bloubul.

If you can only bet on three numbers my stratedgies will be no good to you. I think it is a bit of a con any lottery that doesn't allow you to bet on single numbers. In the UK the national lottery only pays £10 for 3 numbers.

Whereas the Bookmakers pay £330 for three numbers. I mean who do you really wanna be with?

Its hard enough getting one or two numbers. So from two numbers up I expect some decent odds.

This is what the odds are for the UK 49s Lottery.

6 NUMBER DRAW

1 number 6/1

2 numbers 53/1

3 numbers 600/1

4 numbers 8000/1

5 numbers 150,000/1


7 NUMBER DRAW

1 number 5/1

2 numbers 38/1

3 numbers 330/1

4 numbers 4,500/1

5 numbers 50,000/1

To me that is some pretty good odds for your effort. If I ever hit 4 numbers I want to see some money. I have hit 3 numbers twice and got close on 4 numbers a few times.

But realistically one or two numbers is a more fruitful option. Peace.
 

syscrash

Member
I don't know where you're from bloubul but I think that you've the same 6\49 system that I do.

That mean that you're chance to winning something are pretty weak.

You better do like me and follow all the precious info from Fullhouse.

IMO: It's better to bet on something that you have better chance to win a little amount to throw money on a lotto that you have 1 chance to 13 000 000 to win the jackpot.
 

fullhouse

Member
Exactly syscrash

Remember, like I said yesterday. If you're patient you can turn even $50 into 1,000s in a year. And then cream off half of it and leave the rest there to continue making money.

If you turned your $50 into 4,000 by December. And took $2,000 for Xmas presents. You would still have 2,000 going into 2007. Now do you want me to tell you what would happen to $2,000

If you increased it by 50% a month for a year? It is frightening. Like we say in the UK from little acorns grow MIGHTY OAKS. Keep watching (21) & (22) Sys. And don't blame me if 21 and 30 didn't drop. It is Endboxes Eliminator Lol! Remember my one is over and I am waiting for Eliminator 10.

Follow only my Eliminators LMAO! Sorry Endbox, just kidding around...
 

syscrash

Member
So after 2 loosing days, I finally won something. I accord this success to the side-by-side strategy :). I don't know for Fullhouse and Endbox, but this strategy has a winning rate of 100% this far. Everytime a pair of number is eligibles to this strategy at least one number as poped.

Pretty impressive!

All kudos to Fullhouse! :agree2:
 

fullhouse

Member
Hi Syscrash. Yes you're fortunate that the Side by Side stratedgy is going through its best period EVER! I have never seen 11 straight winning runs in a row.

The objective is to get one of the last two numbers Syscrash. If they both drop that is simply a bonus.

I had a feeling number (21) was going to rack up today because it was the crucial number between both stratedgies. And has now brought an end to Both the latest Side by Side qualifier and Endboxes Eliminator.

So where do we stand ??

Well we have no immediate potential qualifiers. But we do have a rare occurance.

Numbers (30) & (31) recently provided the 10th winner for Side by Side.

And usually after a 12 plus run. One of them racks up soon afterwards. But this time they've both stayed out for another 8 draws.

Now tonight I am going to check their longest stayout after a (Side by Side) Qualifier. So if they never go into double figures in draws after a 12 plus run. I am going to lay some decent money on them from tomorrow. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
SIDE BY SIDE Update...

Okay over to my other Stratedgy, never to be neglected.

Yesterday was the eleventh winning run in a row. with number 21 splitting (21) (22) after 13 draws. I am very impressed by the performance of this stratedgy in February. And if it makes it 12 in a row I will be stunned. The state of play is as follows.

After number (30) splitting (30) (31) after 9 draws this teatime today. Our closest potential qualifiers are.

(1) NUMBERS (08) (09)------(09) (10) Both 11 draws no split.

(2) NUMBERS (31) (32) Are 10 draws no split.

(3) NUMBERS (42) (43) Are 10 draws no split.

Now I am not keen on numbers (08) (09) as they had a nasty run of 27 draws until they split last year. I would go for (31) (32) from the selection we have. And also (42) (43) are worthy of interest.

BUT, we are now SERIOUSLY overdue a losing run. So I will be staking with restraint no matter which pair qualifies first. Peace...
 

syscrash

Member
Hi Fullhouse...

I really like how you can be pessimist when you say that we're SERIOUSLY OVERDUE a loosing run.

I'm just curious what's your percentage winning with the side-by-side strategy since yoy use it. :p:
 

syscrash

Member
So today we got interesting results. Most of all potential qualifiers are not eligible anymore.

(9) has shown twice today... Fullhouse was right (again).

The second pair that he mentionned, is not a qualifier anymore because (32) has poped.

Only remains (42)(43) that we observe patiently.

Good luck everyone
 

fullhouse

Member
syscrash said:
Hi Fullhouse...

I really like how you can be pessimist when you say that we're SERIOUSLY OVERDUE a loosing run.

I'm just curious what's your percentage winning with the side-by-side strategy since yoy use it. :p:

I have never kept records for the Side by Side stratedgy as I have for the Eliminator Syscrash. But I can tell you that I have NEVER seen 11 straight winners in a row. Usually you will get 5 or 6 at the most before a run beyond 17 draws occurs.

Now if we get to (((12))) THAT WILL BE SPECIAL.

Yes like I said the other day, only so many pairs can qualify in a given month. So many will get close 11-12 draws and then split. But I think (42) and (43) may be our next qualifiers. They're 12 draws no split now.

So they will qualify for the TEATIME draw tommorow if they don't split lunchtime. I wouldn't put too much money on them though Syscrash, as a losing run really must happen soon.

Or this Stratedgy will be TOO GOOD. Peace..
 
Last edited:

syscrash

Member
so were right... we were due loose.

I was lucky to follow you're advice en not stake nothing. Because, when you say don't put to much, or be conservative... that's mean bet nothing for me, :p: ... there's some advantage to have a small bankroll.
 

fullhouse

Member
Syscrash, I would take it easy on (42 & (43) I didn't have a bet either for draw 13. Because the last qualifiers numbers (21) & (22)

Split on that draw. And from experience that made it EXTREMELY unlightly it would happen again. Now We are on borrowed time until a loss Syscrash. If (42) & (43) split before the 17th draw (they're now at 14) THEN ASK ME WHAT I GONNA SAY.

Because I will be surprized I really will.

I will put a small stake on each number starting from lunchtime tommorow. But it will only be £5 each number and I will increase by 50% for a maximum of 4 draws.

Also we've numbers (10) & (11) at 11 draws no split. And Numbers (44) & (45) at 11 draws no split.

So there could be another qualifier tommorow to follow on with. I like it when qualifiers are a day apart. Because it gives you time to respond to what happens with the pair in front.

So that is the state of play today. Peace...
 

syscrash

Member
Hi folks.

So today was a really interesing day for Side-by-side strategy.


(42)(43)(44)(45) was eligible for side-by-side strategy for teatime draw. And (44)(45) has shown up at that draw. So I won alot despite I put minimal stake.

(42)(43) still not show. Fullhouse, if tomorow one of them doesn't show up, it will be four draw without any show... so if you suggest me to stop staking on them?
:confused:

Thanks Fullhouse for sharing your knowledge... actually, i've done more than 100% profit less 2 weeks. That's pretty impressive for only to strategy. I cannot imagine how much you can do.
 

fullhouse

Member
Hey syscrash

I am very happy that you're making money Syscrash. I wish many more would try my stratedgies. Yes (44) and (45) have now made it 12 out of 12 for February. We are in new territory Syscrash.

This stratedgy has NEVER performed this good. And should (42) or (43) Drop tommorow. I won't believe it. 13 out of 13 in one month will be UNREAL.

I am glad you got both numbers Syscrash. I only had £5 on each because I didn't expect them to drop especially not both. But that is the sweet part of this Stratedgy and it happens every now and then.

Now lets see if (42) or (43) can keep this incredible run going. I would say put a little on them tommorow Syscrash. But don't go crazy. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
SIDE BY SIDE Update...

Well I knew this amazing run had to end. After 11 consecutive winning runs. Today numbers (42) & (43) broke the run By passing the 13----17 zone. I think they may go as long as draw 21. Because that is a number that is due soon.

I have made more money from the Side by Side stratedgy than the Eliminator this month. And that doesn't happen often. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
Okay an interesting day. The pair that failed to make it 13 in a row for the Side by Side stratedgy, Split today one draw late. With number (42) doing the honours as the BONUS ball at lunchtime.

So where does that leave us??

Okay the nearest pair to potential qualification. Is one of the best.

NUMBERS (05) & (06) are now 11 draws no split. That means if either one of them doesn't rack up tommorow they'll be ripe for betting.

I am tempted to start a draw earlier on them because they're that good. But what I will do while I am waiting for them is cover them in doubles with 15 and 49. That way if they rack up before draw 13.

I might catch a double with the 2 remaining numbers from Eliminator 10. A little bonus money so to speak. So I will keep you posted. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
Okay an interesting day. The pair that failed to make it 13 in a row for the Side by Side stratedgy, Split today one draw late. With number (42) doing the honours as the BONUS ball at lunchtime.

So where does that leave us??

Okay the nearest pair to potential qualification. Is one of the best.

NUMBERS (05) & (06) are now 11 draws no split. That means if either one of them doesn't rack up tommorow they'll be ripe for betting.

I am tempted to start a draw earlier on them because they're that good. But what I will do while I am waiting for them is cover them in doubles with 15 and 49. That way if they rack up before draw 13.

I might catch a double with the 2 remaining numbers from Eliminator 10. A little bonus money so to speak. So I will keep you posted. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
Also I forgot to mention numbers (25) & (26) They're 10 draws no split. So there will be action in the side by side stratedgy by Thursday I believe. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
The state of play.

Okay today we got our first qualifiers for March with number (05) & (06) now 13 draws no split. So from tommorow I will be on them.

numbers (25) & (26) are 12 draws no split so they'll probably qualify tommorow too. And I will start on them. There is no way in hell that March will match February's excellence. If I get a win to loss ratio of 7---3 this month I will be happy.

The 12---1 that occured in February is the stuff of dreams and doesn't happen often. So I will keep you updated with how things pan out as the month progresses. Peace...
 

taaroa

Member
Hi fullhouse!

It seems that Eliminator ans Side By Side Strategy work well for 6/49.
On French lotto, I had three qualifiers by Eliminator this Wednesday : 8-19-31. 19 and 31 were drawn 19 in first draw, 31 in second draw. Side by Side is also effective. I predicted 12 which was not drawn but the tests I made tell me that this is a good strategy.

Thank you for sharing your methods.

taaroa
 

taaroa

Member
Hi,

For next drawing Saturday 4 March, the SBS method give me 3 numbers 12-16-17. For 6/49.

See you next Saturday.

taaroa
 

Sidebar

Top