Side By Side Stratedgy

fullhouse

Member
Okay since syscrash seems to be interested in my other numbers stratedgy. I have decided to lay this one out for you guys too.

I believe this stratedgy may be more appealing to some than the Eliminator because it deals with only two numbers at a time.

I have already made some good profit this month from it.

Here are the basics.

I discovered some years ago that when 2 side by side numbers such as our present pair (25) (26) went over 13 draws without either one dropping.

The vast majority of the time one of them would drop in what I call the zone. Draw 13----Draw 17.

To illustrate my point I will give you my results just for this month so far.

NUMBERS (11) (12) Both dropped after 14 draws out (01/02)

NUMBERS (20) (21) 21 dropped after 17 draws out (01/02)

NUMBERS (03) (04) 3 dropped after 16 draws out (05/02)

NUMBERS (25) (26) 25 dropped after 13 draws out (06/02)

NUMBERS (04) (05) 4 dropped after 16 draws out (08/02)

NUMBERS (19) (20) 20 dropped after 16 draws out (12/02)

NUMBERS (23) (24) 23 dropped after 13 draws out TODAY!

And now we have (25) and (26) again. At 16 draws no show. So it is possible that tommorow one of those 2 is coming down.

My only reason for being slightly cautious is that they have already produced a win in the zone this month. So it is possible they will go to the 18-20 range. I am only talking from experience.

I will have some money on them. BUT, not as much as I would have if they hadn't produced a win recently. I will always be honest with you guys and tell you the reality of things. But as you can see from the results above. This is another pretty consistent performer. And I have made alot of cash from this one too over the last 3 years. So there it is. Again if you want me to clarify anything. Feel free to ask. Peace...
 
Last edited:

endbox

Member
Side by Side

Hi , fullhouse...........Thanks for another stratergy to ponder over.............As you predicted No 26 appeared in the lunchtime draw !
 

fullhouse

Member
Thanks guys.

I am glad you appreciate these stratedgies. I know they're very good. But I want you to see them work for yourselves. And over time, your confidence and bankroll, should you decide to play for real will grow.

Well I will get you right up to date with the side by side stratedgy.

Today (25) (26) split with (26) our little stop out showing up after a long vacation. It is the current longest losing streak of 2006. A distinction it won't hold for too long I can tell ya.

Now we have (24) (25) at 17 draws no split. My instincts tell me, although one might drop tommorow. It is likely to be around the 18-20 range.

The reason being, there have been many successes this month. And no pairs have exceeded 17 draws. This is unusual. There is normally at least one pair that goes beyond 17 draws. And I think it could well be (24) (25)

So yes, I will be covering them but only with a tenner on each. If they go to the 18-20 range, I will lay up some decent money, on them because that is where I expect one to rack up.

But Side by side is a very good stratedgy. And anyone who follows it will make a profit. I will never lay any stratedgy on this or anyother forum, unless I swear by its worth as a good stratedgy. It has to have proved itself to me for at least 2 years of real life profit making. And both this and the Eliminator have done so. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
SIDE BY SIDE Update...

Okay here is the latest for my other main numbers stratedgy Side by Side.

I have to say February has been an outstanding month for this stratedgy. Producing 9 out of 9 winners in the 13---17 draw zone.
That is remarkable. There is usually one or two losing runs out of 8-10 qualifiers, so this month has been top notch.

Again just like with the Eliminator, when a string of success occurs, my cautious nature kicks in. And I expect there to be the inevitable losing run.

At present the closest pair to qualification is (30) (31) at 12 draws no split. Now with number 30 in the pair. It is very likely that this pair will split inside the 13---17 zone. So from tomorrow I will be covering them with a 100-60 split.

By that I mean if I put £10 on number (30) then I will put £6 on number (31) Or if I were to put £5 on number (30) I would stake £3 on number (31) to maintain the same ratio.

So by doing this I am favouring the number I have more faith in. And if (31) racks up first. I will still pair number (30) with another number in the same ratio. As at the moment it is 13 draws from the longest it has stayed out for over 2 years. (28) draws. At 15 draws no show.

The next pair that may or may not qualify over the weekend is (11) and (12) Presently at 10 draws no split. Again there is the King of all numbers in this pair. Number 12. This number hasn't been past 26 draws in the last 2.5 years.

So That is the state of play for the (Side by Side) stratedgy. I will keep you posted. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
Update of an update!

Okay this afternoon one of the best pairs of numbers you could bet on has now qualified for the SIDE BY SIDE stratedgy.

Numbers (30) and (31) are now 13 draws no split. How rare is it for them to go this long without a split . Well since the beginning of 2004 this is their longest runs.

24/02/04 (12) split on the 13th draw

12/03/04 (12) split on the 13th draw

23/06/04 (12) split on the 13th draw

24/10/04 (13) split on the 14th draw

24/01/05 (16) split on the 17th draw

So basically this pair hasn't even been past 12 draws for over a year. That is about as good as it gets, I will start to cover them from the teatime draw today.

Another good pair although not as good as (30) and (31) is numbers (11) and (12) They've now gone 11 draws no split. So I will be keeping an eye on them too. If they remain un-split after 13 draws I will lay cash on them too. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
10 out of 10!

Hey syscrash I hope you were on (30) & (31) I did the 100/60 split I spoke of yesterday.

So I layed £25 on number (30) and £15 on number (31)

Although I didn't get the favoured number, number (31) racked up so I made £50 profit. Not a bad day.

I tell you, I have been studying numbers for nearly 10 years and opperating the two stratedgies you now know of for going on 4 years come July. And I am still amazed at what I see happening week in week out.

The side by side stratedgy is now 10 wins out of 10 qualifiers for February. And that is all you can ask for. But I will be more cautious for the next couple of qualifiers. And just like with the Eliminator, I will revert to half stakes until I experience a losing run.

So now we have numbers (11) and (12) which have now gone 12 draws no split. If they don't split by the lunchtime draw tomorrow, I will commence covering them with half stakes. Favouring number (12) with a 100/60 split again. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
I am glad to hear that Syscrash. What is your bankroll ? I am going to show both you and Endbox how I stake. And what is possible from just a £200 bankroll if you follow the Eliminator and Side by Side stratedgies properly. Peace.
 

syscrash

Member
I initially put 50$CAD on my account... now I have 75. In less than 1 week... I have done 50% profit... not bad.

The big disavantage for betting on bluesquare website, is that we have to pay 35$CAD to have our cash back... that's pretty outrageous.

Concerning the profit, I know that will not always be like this. :p: but I think that it can be a solid sideline and buy some gifts for my (french canadian) girlfriend.

Thanks again.
 

fullhouse

Member
35 CaD???

I don't understand why they're charging you so much to withdraw syscrash. I have an account with them and withdrawal is free. Why are they charging you that much ? Did they give a reason ?

No the profit won't always come so quickly, but when I post the new thread for staking the Eliminator. You'll see what is possible even from $50 if you leave it there for a year. Peace...
 

syscrash

Member
Re: 35 CaD???

fullhouse said:
I don't understand why they're charging you so much to withdraw syscrash. I have an account with them and withdrawal is free. Why are they charging you that much ? Did they give a reason ?

No the profit won't always come so quickly, but when I post the new thread for staking the Eliminator. You'll see what is possible even from $50 if you leave it there for a year. Peace...

First, I thought that you would laught about my initial bankroll. but I have to say that I don't play to much loto. May be 10 or 20$ a month... so 50$ a day is a lot for me.

The reason why they charge me that fees, is because they claim that they connot deposit money on my card, so they have to send me it other way.

The side by side number is pretty good for me to date... there is 100% of the time I win something. For the eleminator, I placed 2 little stakes for the tomorow draws, and put a bigger one on monday morning.

Again, thanks you very much.
 

fullhouse

Member
You are very welcome Syscrash. Today the king of numbers no. (12) spoiled the party. And spilt (11) and (12) a draw too early from qualifying for SIDE BY SIDE. Nevermind, February has been exceptional for the system and given me 10 out of 10.

I have my eye on numbers (34) (35) now. As they're 11 draws no split. So if they don't split by tommorow, they'll be covered from Tuesday Syscrash. A word of caution though, it is now seriously overdue a losing run. And (34) (35) may be the pair to oblige. So I will be staking very conservatively on any qualifiers for the remainder of February. Peace...
 

bloubul

Member
Side By Side Statedgy

Hi fullhouse,

I'm very interested in your method. Does it work on a 6/49 lotto as well?

Thanks

BlouBul :cool:
 

syscrash

Member
fullhouse said:
You are very welcome Syscrash. Today the king of numbers no. (12) spoiled the party. And spilt (11) and (12) a draw too early from qualifying for SIDE BY SIDE. Nevermind, February has been exceptional for the system and given me 10 out of 10.

I have my eye on numbers (34) (35) now. As they're 11 draws no split. So if they don't split by tommorow, they'll be covered from Tuesday Syscrash. A word of caution though, it is now seriously overdue a losing run. And (34) (35) may be the pair to oblige. So I will be staking very conservatively on any qualifiers for the remainder of February. Peace...

I think that you're friend was right to ask you some question about why you don't stake more. After 10/10 wins with the side-by-side method, I would ask no question and stake a lot more.

But, I think that the padawan have to follow the Jedi master. ;) Anyway, if you compare my stake VS yours and Endbox, you'll see that I still put very conservative stake.

Thanks again,
 

syscrash

Member
So (34) and (34) has shown up today. They will not be eligible for the side-by-side strategy. The next pair that we should all look at next is : (21) (22)

With my not so old history file (december 2004), I remarked that that pair show up together about each 70 draws, last time that pair shown up was 65 draws ago.

Wait and see then.

IMO : Side-by-side strategy is my favortite Fullhouse's method. Easy to catch... and relatively reliable up to date :)

Thanks again Fullhouse
 

fullhouse

Member
Yes, I thought some members would prefer the Side by Side stratedgy. It is more straight forward than the Eliminator. But there will be losing runs you can count on it. In February 2005 numbers (35) (36) went 29 draws before they split. So there will be pairs that don't split in the ZONE (13---17)

There were 2 out of 9 in January that went to 19 draws before splitting. Incidentally a very popular place for pairs that don't split in the ZONE. But February has been a dream. And I often ask myself why I don't throw down more money. But remember those gambling sceptics Syscrash ?

Well I used to be one of them. And I still have a bit of it in me. Although I think it is a good thing. I have seen too many compulsive gamblers just throwing their money away.

And don't worry about how much money you're playing with Syscrash, you can build up even $50 to a nice amount in even a year. Have you ever worked out what would happen to $50 if you increased it by 50% each month and left it grow without touching it ?

If you built it up by 50% each month and increasing your stakes as it grew. By the end of the year you would have well over $4,000 dollars. So let it ride. A monthly 50% growth average is very possible with the Side by Side stratedgy.

And yes I have my eye on (21) (22) they'll be our next pair if they don't split tommorow. But I have a feeling (21) could drop as its also part of Endboxes final two in his Eliminator along with number (30) Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
Re: Side By Side Statedgy

bloubul said:
Hi fullhouse,

I'm very interested in your method. Does it work on a 6/49 lotto as well?

Thanks

BlouBul :cool:

Hi bloubal. I don't know much about the 6/49 lotto. I would appreciate it if you told me how it opperates and how many draws there are in a week. Really you need a good number of draws per week to get enough action. If I waited for the usual national lotteries I would only get about 4 Eliminators a year. No good really for building up the bankroll.

But any lottery can be used that allows you to cover a single number. Its just the frequency that would be a problem. There are 14 draws a week for the UK 49s lottery. Peace...
 

bloubul

Member
Re: Re: Side By Side Statedgy

fullhouse said:
Hi bloubal. I don't know much about the 6/49 lotto. I would appreciate it if you told me how it opperates and how many draws there are in a week. Really you need a good number of draws per week to get enough action. If I waited for the usual national lotteries I would only get about 4 Eliminators a year. No good really for building up the bankroll.

But any lottery can be used that allows you to cover a single number. Its just the frequency that would be a problem. There are 14 draws a week for the UK 49s lottery. Peace...


Hi fullhouse

In our lottery you must have at least 3 numbers or more to win any thing, less than 3 numbers no pay, further we have two draws per week, (I exclude the LottoPlus which is working in the same manner). Thus it gives you 8 - 9 draws per month.

BlouBul :cool:
 

Sidebar

Top