Sangoma-number divination

[Excellence]

Good evening Springbok,

Thank you very much for writing all the first 80 draws in your file. After I compared your results with the ones provided by Win-on-numbers I noticed that my file has 5 draws in plus! According to Win-on-numbers you skipped the following draws:

2 september, teatime, between lines 49 and 50 in your file: 5, 13, 20, 36, 40, 46, 8 (I put the bonus ball always the last because I have analyzes based on her. I don’t think that is any importance for Winnalotto analyze, right?)

22 and 23 august, between lines 68 and 69 in you file:

5, 16, 19, 30, 32, 38, 31
9, 12, 14, 18, 19, 40, 47
6, 16, 22, 33, 42, 47, 5
2, 6, 18, 29, 30, 45, 35

I don’t know who is right: they or you. If you watched the lottery every day then obviously you are, if not they probably are.

Anyway, my filters are well written, I will restart to analyze some draws now, whit my new history file. The previous was really messed up. Also I would like to write all my draws in the same format as yours, stop writing bonus ball last and I even intend to create a file with your 80 draws and keep him under observation until he grows a little more. Lot of things to do and so few time left so, thanks again now.

 

[bloubul]

Hi Springbok / Patrick123

Hoe gaan dit met julle. Help die ou man asb, ek is nou wel stadig met die weg spring maar as ek spoed het dan gaan ek. Patrick123 you said in one of your post that the program is RAM hungry? How much RAM do you need to run the program safely? Can to little RAM cause incorrect selections? What processor are also recommended?

Thanks.
BlouBul

 

[Springbok]

More Bloubul

Hoe gaan dit met jou in die Kaap, Vrystaat of die Transvaal. The current Winnalotto is run on my desktop(P3 1Gig with 512megabyte memory) and a IBM laptop with a Celeron 500 megahertz with around 166megabytes of memory. Both handle the programme easily. I cannot see how the hardware can affect the result. The problem is many of the filters are dependent on the accuracy of the median for the next draw or so. Medians can vary according to the length of the draw history. You also have to face a semi-chaotic situation. Sometimes the filters are very accurate, sometimes they can be hopeless. It is best to understand what the filters try to do and backtest using different history lengths and see what they do. The main problem is to harmonise them so they can give you two,three or four pairs in the next draw. Just achieving two pairs will give you four two number combinations and one of them will be correct. This is a huge step forward. Getting 3 pairs is even a bigger step forward. This is not impossible. Add a historical high and you could get 4 pairs giving you 16 four number combinations. Also think of trips as well. Even getting one pair right will give you one correct number in 2. The software will stream a huge amount of information to you. A lot of it is white noise and you have to try and find the signal.

We are trying to achieve some kind of prediction so you don't have to rely on consulting the stars, ouma, oupa or looking at tealeaves or by using QuikPiks. I think we do better than that. In fact I know we do better than that.

 

[Springbok]

Hi again Bloubul

Look at this simple technique. Load the lottery data history. Go to the drawing screen and hit pairs. All the 1176 pairs appear. Go to the skips screen. Sort skip 1. Look at all the pairs that have 3 or 4 skips with 0 appearing consecutively. Write them down. Check the next draw. Did any of those numbers appear. Adjust the technique until you get it right. You should be able to eliminate 10 to 15 numbers that way. Why play a 6/49 game when you can play a 6/34 game. This is a big step forward. Think of those poor people who worry about wheeling numbers and those who are concerned with odd/even distribution. Totally irrelevant. Also check that your combinations have a good spread of numbers. 3 or 4 must be within 6 skips. one or two between skips 7 to 12 and say one with a skip of 12+.

 

[bloubul]

Hi Springbok

Nee ek bly hier in die Kaap, so 1km van 'n Wyn landgoed af. Thanks for the info Springbok, why I'm asking is that my work's PC has only 256M RAM and it uses all, I even battle to close the programe, at home I got 512DDR 400 RAM and 2.4gig processor so I will test it tonight.
Yea I know I'm far behind but I will catchup in the end.

BlouBul

 

[Springbok]

That's it, Bloubul. Look at the program and let your mind wander freely.This will take many weeks.Sipping Old Brown can help free the mind. You may even discover techniques that are unknown. Any way I now have to praat en gesels to the Euromillions history file and see what they can tell me. £88 million pounds needs a home and my bank account would be very happy to accomodate it.

 

[Patrick123]

Hi All,
I've been busy with some other projects, but will start updating WinnaLotto again. An XP with 256 Ram, will do but only up to about 200 draws before it starts swapping out to the Hard drive. In-material though, the results should stay consistent no matter what hardware you're using.
I want to update the wheeling for blitzed, and try and get the filter-side automated, so that you can take a range of filters, let the program run through them, and give you a list of the selections, as well as what filter kicked them out.

Regards
Patrick

 

[Springbok]

Euromillions anti-prediction

For those who are desperate or foolish enough here are some numbers that should not come up in tonight's Euromillions. This applies to the 5/50 section. The first group are the safest. The second group are less safe.

1, 5, 9, 11, 17, 29, 32, 33, 35 ,37

2,3, 10, 21, 38,40, 42, 48

The forties are the most dangerous as the forties decade is due to reappear this evening. Be warned.

 

[Patrick123]

That should basically bring it down to a 5/32 game

 

[Springbok]

Hi Patrick

You are right about XP. It was a memory hog until Vista came round. My favourite is Windows98SE although I use Windows 2000(both refugees from E-bay and cost next to nothing). It is a pity Win98 does not run with Skype.

 

[Springbok]

Hi Patrick

The first anti-prediction group is based on a 200 draw history. Any pair that showed two or more consecutive hits were noted. The second group were cherry picked from the higher opening batsmen and inbetweeners. I could have picked more but it would get dodgier and dodgier. I could also use Saliu's Pot filters in Pick532. Maybe I will do this later. They can be pretty safe provided you don't push them to far.

I also have a few files of one million plus. The real draws go on top. The median is worked out and any files that show an above median result in the last 3 or more consecutive draws are used to purge any combinations I might have. Most of the files are 99.9999% simulated. This is quite a handy practice as there are one million combinations you don't have to worry about.

 

[Springbok]

More anti-prediction

Ok folks. here are some more numbers to avoid if you are totally desperate. This is taken from a layer in one of my files for Pick532.

4, 9, 20 ,22, 36

 

[Springbok]

Hi Barge

As far as I aware the inbetweener forecast never came about. The results were wrong this time. No problem they will be right next time.

 

[Springbok]

Goie more Patrick

Well I aint a rand billionaire. Winnalotto gave me the number 34(it was in the cluster) and either I intuited the star numbers or St Jude took a fancy to me and it appears I won £7,20 for my single ticket investment of £1,50. The anti-prediction of Winnalotto was quite good but not perfect and the anti-prediction from Saliu's software was not good. So I am reasonably happy. But I did expect 2 numbers to have come in in the 5/50 section at least

I am increasingly looking at trips to increase accuracy and achieve harmonisation of all 3 filters simultaneously.

 

[church62]

Hello Patrick123 I have a question for you about your program
Dose it work with the Super 7 lotto from Canada
7+ Bonus /47.

As from what I have been reading it is for 6/49 type draws
But I am looking for something that will give me the best range of 21 numbers to play based on past drawing history.

 

[struxo]

anti filters

Hi all,
i tested anti filters and i think it must plays as other filters. Try only one or two pairs or 2-3 single numbers. It's tempting to choose 20 numbers not to play but i think it's not the way. I remove only 4-5 numbers and they are not drawn.
Maybe it's the key.

 

[black prince]

Winnalotto Wheel

Hi Patrick123,

I've been having success with Pick5 (5/30) getting 3 or 4 numbers consistantly
and occasionally 5. I usually have 9 to 12 numbers to wheel and so far, the
wheels I'm using are way beyond the COW (cost of Winning) for me. I need
an effective abrievated wheel that can strike a balance between COW and
numbers to play. If the Winnalotto could somehow test an abrievated
wheel for it's best percentage of hits (5/4, 5/3, etc.) this would be a
really useful program just by itself. :finger: Suppose I wanted to create
a wheel for 9 numbers with 4 out-of 5 and only wanted 10 draws to play.
What would be the most effective wheel to achieve this result. With
filters for odd/even, sums for max/min, consecutive numbers over 4,
and my favoriate of using pairs that come together frequently which I
can select. I realize your super busy and this is not as high a priority,
but it would be nice

Thanks

BP

 

[jokerh1977]

Black Prince

Black Prince,
I too play a 5 game. what range of draws have you been successful with? You are getting good results. Ill post a column filter ive had very good success with for 5/39 when I get off work. Which filters work best with your game?

 

[jokerh1977]

Patrick,
Thank you for posting the ability to check the frequency of the numbers on the graph. You might want to recheck the code though, unfortunately it does not give the correct results.

I was thinking of excellences post about a column for the total amount of hits of the pair or trips in the span of draws. That would be an IMMENSELY useful tool. the medians from the more frequently hit pairs are much more reliable.

 

[barge]

Hi Black Prince

Congrats on your wins. I use pairs frequently but without exceptional success. What filters are you using, and are you using a random history or a real one?