Sangoma-number divination

Patrick123

Member
Hi All,
I picked up, one small problem that I'll be sorting out. If you work with skip data past skip 6 i.e. via the skip(x) function, the current skip values are returned and not historical values. I'll get this sorted out, hopefully by tomorrow.

Regards
Patrick
 

Springbok

Member
Howzit Patrick

Gee, I am slowly getting to grips with setting up the filters is Winnalotto(I can be a slow learner sometimes:) ). Taking opening batsmen, is there a way of getting rid of columns without having to uncheck them, like writing a code and saving it? For example with opening batsmen I would like to see the median followed by the skip cycle columns with nothing in between. So every time I want to load the filter this is done without all the unchecking.
 

Patrick123

Member
Bonjour Springbok,

Yes, what you do, is to load the filter, Uncheck the columns you don't want to view, move the columns around to suite you, resize column widths as you want them. Then click save, you can either save over the existing filter, or save it as something else. You now simply load this filter in the future.

Regards
Patrick
 

barge

Member
Hi Patrick123

My Internal column frequently unticks itself, usually when I am trying to load a second extra column. (and disappears on the Drawing Analysis screen).It then refuses to reset when I recheck the view box. Resetting the columns cures the problem, but it gets boring when I am trying to add 2 or 3 columns. Maybe I have missed something? (The prog just gets better and better by the way):liplick:
 

barge

Member
My Internal column frequently unticks itself, usually when I am trying to load a second extra column. (and disappears on the Drawing Analysis screen).It then refuses to reset when I recheck the view box. Resetting the columns cures the problem, but it gets boring when I am trying to add 2 or 3 columns. Maybe I have missed something? (The prog just gets better and better by the way):liplick:
 

Patrick123

Member
Hi Barge,
I'll try and duplicate the problem. If you have a sequence for me, it will be so much easier. e.g. click here, do this, click there, etc. it will help a lot.

Well I sent a prediction through for NZ Lotto to my sister, tomorrow 10 AM SA time, I'll know the answer :finger: . I'll let you know.

Thanks
Patrick
 

Springbok

Member
Hi Patrick

After much blood, sweat 'n tears I got three techniques running on Winnalotto(opening batsmen, Inbetweeners and Draadsitters). Some quick testing gives me the confidence that at last Winnalotto is as effective as my homebrew stuff for using those techniques. Each technique has 3 or 4 different filters representing the different skip cycles(eg draadsitter5, draadsitter6, draadsitter7). Each number represents the amount of skip cycles under analysis. I assume that the facility does not exist in a single filter to vary the amount of cycles for analysis currently. If it does not, it would be handy to have a control which would designate the number of skip cycles to use.

With these techniques up and running I shall begin to really slaughter the 49s and hopefully the Thunderball game. Let us know how the NZ lottery went.
 

Patrick123

Member
Hi Springbok,

Well NZ lottery was a bit of a downer. Only had 3 balls in. All 7 came from within the last 4 draws. I had worked with the filters originally on the UK49. I'll have to go through them again for NZ and see which are the most appropriate for there.

Hopefully you fare better.

I'll see what I can do about adding more skip cycle related functions into the system.

Regards
Patrick
 

Springbok

Member
Molo Patrick

That's Xhosa for hello:) I looked it up on the net. Adding the functionality of setting the number of skip cycles for analysis is critical. I now can go up to 9 skip cycles in testing. It is magic for the draadsitter. One of the problems with Winnalotto was the vast amount of possible draadsitter candidates. Now as you flick through greater and greater skip cycles you reduce the candidates normally ending up with one or two. Look at the probabilities which I posted earlier to Barge and you will see them come true. So far I have tested 8 single draadsitters and they have all hit in the next draw.
 

barge

Member
Hi Patrick123 and Springbok

I get more and more impressed........
As regards my problem with Sangoma, I usually leave my machine on most of the time, it is more stable that way. I decided to re-boot, and to delete and replace sangoma with a fresh download. This seems to have done the trick, all is well again. As a sideline I used to teach computer subjects at a |Tech, and never ceased to be amazed at how confused they can get sometimes.....the machines that is!:eek:
I am trailing along behind Springbok, on setting up skip cycle files, but I'm getting there. Meantime, there is tonights Tball...
 

Springbok

Member
Hi Barge

That's the way to go. For starters concentrate on the draadsitters. Go up to 9 skip cycles and then test. Your life will never be the same again:)
 

struxo

Member
to Patrick

Hi Patrick,
i played with old version of your program and had good results with N+x>=H.
In old version i can change x. i would like see this in new version if it's possible so i can test it with my filters.
 

barge

Member
Hi Patrick123

Can I request a line using skip(x) which will return the value of the skip in a column? I am creating columns using skip(x)but they are not returning any values. I am using eg: col#30=skip(9) then recalc, I get the column with no value. I am showing columns with High Skip and Skips OK.
It's late and I shouldn't have chased the port with malt!:rolling:
 

barge

Member
Hi Again!

I don't often overdo it on a Saturday night, but I should know by now that there are times to ignore the current quest. Truth is I had a good result but only 3 of the 4 on the same line, for the second time. Once more, ignore my last, I forgot about the two arguments..............:lphant:
 

struxo

Member
to Patrick

As Barge says : ignore my last post :)
I didn't look carefully in new version.
But Patrick i have one problem with keno. I unchecked date and get all 20 numbers instead 19 but results in drawing analysis is wrong (last drawn section)
Is it possible to do something about it? I testing for now with 19 numbers.
 

bloubul

Member
Hi Springbok / Patrick123

Ek sien julle het nie tyd gemors nie. Enige groot "HITS". I have two Excel spreadsheets 1) Pairs and 2 Hit & Skip, for those who are interested, just let me know and I will upload it for you, well I have some plenty of reading to do.

BlouBul :cool:
 

Springbok

Member
Sawubona Patrick and Barge

I was busy testing the draadsitter over the weekend using the full bore pairs. Great result Saturday with diving in and out of the data. On Sunday, this time testing consecutively gave very poor results. Using this technique on the full bore pairings is not going to change anyones life. I have started filtering the alpha, beta etc pairings with draadsitter and at the moment get good results. Testing is done from three perspectives, a) hitting in 4 draws, b) within the stipulated parameters of the filter, c) hitting very next draw. At this moment it would appear that the alpha beta etc files are far superior to the full bore(ie 1176 pairings) when used with Winnalotto). I am not too sure why this is so. I will indulge in some more coining tossing exercises using computer simulations to try and find out why.
 

barge

Member
Hi Springbok Patrick123

I have a small problem. I load say, 3 skips, 6,7,8, using add a column in each case. They display OK.Then I load eg skipsitter, in column 33 in this case. As soon as I load skipsitter, the highlight which was on column 33 jumps to col 1 (Median), and the previously loaded skips have been dumped, leaving skipsitter in column 30. I am using skip(x) + 0 for the skips.
Am I missing a method of "fixing" the columns after I have changed them?
Any suggestions welcome!:confused:
 

Sidebar

Top