Sangoma-number divination

[Springbok]

Patterns to be aware of

Let look at some patterns. Alpha18, bravo19 . alpha18 is a fence sitter(draadsitter). In the last two skip cycles, it has penetrated the median twice. Will it do so lunchtime today? I think on the balance of probabilities it will hit lunchtime.

Bravo19 is on its way to the median.It has penetrated the median twice in the past. So it should hit lunchtime or teatime latest for the rebalance to occur.

Bravo23 is on its way to the median. In the past it has penetrated the median 4 times. Unlikely to do so again. Should hit lunchtime or teatime.

The reports are based on real numbers.

* alpha 18 * Hits: 23 { 25, 48}
------------------------
* Skips >>>>> 1 17 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 0 8 1 6 5 0 1 7 3 11 1 3 * Sorted Skips: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 17
** Skip Median: 1


* bravo # 19 * Hits: 19 {5, 25}
------------------------
* Skips >>>>> 1 5 11 2 1 3 0 1 2 0 13 2 3 8 11 9 1 2 6 * Sorted Skips: 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 5 6 8 9 11 11 13
** Skip Median: 2

* bravo # 23 * Hits: 33 {15. 18}
------------------------
* Skips >>>>> 0 2 3 2 14 1 0 2 0 4 0 1 0 4 2 8 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 2 1 1 4 0 2 2 0 5 0 * Sorted Skips: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 5 8 14 ** Skip Median: 1

 

[Springbok]

Alpha 18 hit lunchtime as expected. The remaining 2 pairs did not hit lunch or teatime as I thought they would. The 6 pairs from the synthetic file finshed at lunchtime with a 100% strike rate. 3 hit in the first draw and 3 hit in the fourth draw. Pairs can be a bit dodgy. At least one of the failing pairs could have co-operated with me. Trips tend to be more accurate. I had a trip for lunchtime which hit. Had I joined it with alpha18 it would have given 6 two number combinations to hit the 2 number prize.

Patrick, our chosen pair from the real file is definitely in the gammadoelas(the sticks, the back of beyond). Definitely a rogue, an outlaw-exhibiting strong anti-social tendencies. Is it possible to identify these high skip pairs as potential rogues? What I am looking at is when we pick a pair with a high, it must have reached that high at least twice before before it turned. The pair we picked had reached its high. It had not achieved this before-say at least twice. This may be an avenue of enquiry.

I am still testing the numbers to miss out next draw to use in the draw after. This type of scenario is too good to miss out if it is true. I am also looking at the two failed pairs to see what they will do next. They were basically a two shot affair and then dump. The median sitter is always a one shot affair.

 

[Patrick123]

Hi Springbok,

My clients are keeping me busy for a while. Please bear with me & I will resume as soon as possible with the programming and analysis. I will however be reading here all the time & posting messages.

Thanks
Patrick

 

[Springbok]

Hi Patrick
No 4 finally came in lunchtime. I have been thinking of the logic that states if a pair hits its historical high, why would exceed it next draw. This is a contradiction because some of them do. We must look more closely at what the numbers are communicating to us. Here are the candidates for teatime(highest sorted skips at end):-

2,26------17,18,26
2,44------15,15,18,24
8,44------10,10,11,14,14,15
26,38-----11,12,14,15,15
26,39-----12,14,14,15
26,44-----14,16,18,19
38,44-----13,14,14,15,15

Obviously they cannot all drop in teatime. Which one will? Two have tested their highs twice and rebounded. The highest skip is 2,44. It has no history of testing its highest skip. So my vote will go for 26,38 or 38,44. probably the best bet will be on the three numbers 26,38,44. I have not tested this in practice yet purely on logic. Let's see what teatime brings. The only thing I can say about 2,44 is that it is on skip 24. Most numbers do not pass the 25. skip.

 

[Springbok]

Well 2,44 and 2,26 slotted in. one of them realised that they were approaching the 25 mark Shows you how tough the lottery can be even when you are using reasonably sophisticated techniques.

 

[Springbok]

Hello Patrick
Point your browser here and download. This will fry your brain. Will discuss it in the future on how it could be used for lotteries. I am familiar with it. It is useless in predicting numbers and there lies its value. It tells you what wont come up. This is a new world, the world of euclidian dimensions, attractors and chaotic orbits in phase space. It can give strange results.
http://www.myjavaserver.com/~nonlinear/vra/download.html

 

[Patrick123]

Hi Springbok,
Now I really feel as if I'm going where no-one else has ventured before!. This is fascinating stuff and will give it all the attention it deserves.

Regards
Patrick

 

[Springbok]

Hi Patrick
I trust you are having a look at VRA, pressing the buttons to see what happens and looking at the help file. Loading the files such as sine, beethhoven etc. There is a lot there. Once you are ready I can tell you about using it for lotteries-that is the way I use it which would probably shock Eugene Kononov(the designers of VRA).

Being having fun with sangoma edition with median sitters with pairs and trips. It is really hot. Frequently I can hit 3 winning numbers in a pool of seven or eight. Even dedicated wheelers would find the programme useful and even start to actually make some money for a change. Without doubt the programme is the most powerful weapon anyone can have to defeat the lottery. The trick is to find the remaining three numbers. From my point of view it speeds up the analysis compared to my homegrown stuff although I still use it for cross checking for greater accuracy. In the end the purge facility and Past Draws of Saliu's incomparable Lotwon632 and 532 will bring home the bacon. You can even get an extra boost from VRA. Roll on the good times! We have the tools, so let's use them

 

[Springbok]

I am going to stick my neck out on the 6/49 game. Reading the skips in my alpha, beta and delta files and listing the 3 number groups that I think statistically(also intuitively) will not appear lunchtime. The bonus ball is excluded. I am hoping to reduce the 6/49 game to a 6/27 game. The following numbers should not appear:- {1,2,3, 6,8,12,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,25,26,31,38,44,46,47,48,49}

We await the lunchtime draw to see if the numbers have talked truthfully to me. It is vitally important that we achieve this for if we can it will put the 6/49 lottery within range. It is pointless to play with all the numbers as is suggested for example in the full spectrum system when we know that certain numbers or groups will not appear next draw. The problem is how far we can push the envelope of deletion.

 

[Patrick123]

Hi Springbok,
I agree with you, by using Sangoma, we can predict some highly probable numbers, coupling this with the numbers that should not appear, the VRA technique and the 'draadsitters', we have immediately reduced the odds well within our favour. It may not be sufficient immediately for the JP but it definitely brings the higher divisions within reach
Regards
Patrick

 

[Springbok]

Well it happened again. 4 of the regular numbers which I would have deleted hit in the delete list. The bonus number also appeared on the delete list. On the flip side 5 of the winning numbers(including bonus number) hit with the 22 deleted numbers. If I was aiming for that it would have been an excellent performance. I just don't understand this. I aim to delete numbers and they come up. It seems that the opposite happens.Evil spirits(tokkeloshe) have entered my mind

 

[Springbok]

The opening batsmen

We are looking at the "opening batsmen" to use the cricketing term. These pairs hit last draw so they are fresh, hence they are the opening batsman,getit? Opening batsman are easily recognised because they have a 0 in the last column, meaning they hit last time, so a new game(match begins). We are looking at some specific characteristics in that they show a number of consecutive above the median cycles as shown below.The more above the median skip cycles, the greater their change of hitting in the next draw or so. Thus Xpa1 and Xpc1 have 5 above median cycles.If you were betting both would be good bets to hit in the next 2 draws. Remember you still have the 4 draw margin.

* XPa1 * Hits: 24 {2,24}
------------------------
* Skips >>>>> 0 3 5 8 9 3 2 1 2 5 4 14 0 1 3 0 3 1 0 1 2 2 7 0 * Sorted Skips: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 5 5 7 8 9 14 ** Skip Median: 2

* XPb1 * Hits: 28 {10, 34}
------------------------
* Skips >>>>> 0 4 5 5 3 1 4 3 1 5 0 0 2 3 2 0 1 6 3 2 1 0 7 4 2 4 0 3 * Sorted Skips: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 7 ** Skip Median: 2



* XPc1 # 1 * Hits: 23 {8, 35}
------------------------
* Skips >>>>> 0 7 9 3 2 15 1 0 18 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 4 2 6 1 1 2 1 * Sorted Skips: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 4 6 7 9 15 18 ** Skip Median: 1

 

[barge]

Sprinbok

As always, interesting stuff. I'm happy to add that my Iso came up with 36 and 34 in the same draws! My attempt with the Sangoma edition (written by a genius of coursecame up with 34 and 39.......sadly I only bet on 34 and 36
I am trying to crack VB to get a better handle on groups, I used to use the DOS based variety many moons ago, and as Ion sys, when it comes to number crunching, Windows is a dinosaur. I will continue, as time permits. Sometimes life seems to get in the way!!

 

[Patrick123]

Well it's looking like things are starting to come together nicely, glad to hear of positive cash flows At this stage all I've had time for, is to tweak up the sort option, so this should be much faster, (no more watching the pot boil)
In another day or two, I should be completed with my client's work, then I can get back into improving the Sangoma edition.
I going to go with {7,8,14,23,24,26,30,41,42} as having potential for lunchtime. {24,41} are my 'opening batsmen' of choice.

 

[barge]

Springbok

What happen??
At least Patrick123 and me chose one number (30), successfully(!!) (no bet on it though). It is a while since I've seen so many unconnected integers.

 

[Springbok]

Barge, I chose 8:35. Before lunch it was an opening batsman and now it is a median sitter(at 1) based on 200 draws. It will come in teatime. If I had the courage of my convictions I would put £10,000 on each number but I wont.

 

[Patrick123]

The numbers are in total disarray, with 26 at an all time high after 1000 draws. Analysing further, I was thinking of as what we calculate the N+x >H probability, taking this further and then calculating this against the all-time highs of all the balls or pairs or trips. e.g. 26 is at 29 skips, but 13 has an all time high of 56. So using the same formula, for 26, we get 100 * 4/41 to give us only a 10% chance of it hitting.

Any thoughts on this?

 

[barge]

Patrick123

Nothing much to add except that 26 is shouting from any angle yo calculate it.
Apart from 30, I also had 32 (no bet on it either!). It was paired with 37 in a North grid which completed last night.
Never mind, one snowball doth not make a winter or something similarly idiotic!
Onwards

 

[Springbok]

Barge, you got a whole lot of ways of chasing a number pair. You got the original grids, northwind etc. These grids are not to be sneezed at. Then we got the parts of sangoma- historical highs, opening batsmen, fence sitters. The great thing about these methods is that they chase number pairs in different skip ranges. This is a key to multiple hits. I think what would be interesting is to run a parallel test. In other words run all these methods at the same time and see how they perform against each other AND see how they fare in scoring multiple hits. Maybe I will open a thread and put test predictions and results over a week or so.

 

[Patrick123]

That sounds like an excellent idea.