Roger.www

[Give me a break]

Hey guys it's been a long time for me.

I have this horrible theory that olg digitally collects all the numbers into a system then determines the amount of $ it will pay out for the day then chooses a number that will pay out whatever amount. So you get 5 out of 6 or like i had once seven out of eight. I find it very difficult to believe with so many people playing with all the different number combination that every time the winning drawn numbers always have lots of category 5 and below but nothing ever of any real large amount.

So once i figured out this is what was going on i stopped playing, because if that is true ... even if you were a math wiz you can't win a rigged game - it's like trying to win an election when the votes are already rigged - the outcome is predetermined.

Thoughts are welcome and I would love it if you could shoot me the highest you've ever heard of Roger.www that is the biggest you've personally won or heard of anyone that you know of to have one. I think there was like 1 guy to ever get 10 out of 10 like ever but I mean with 16 years of the game being played and 1 guy ever having got all ten once - why would anyone even bother playing category 10.

I've been considering playing category 6 for 10 dollars daily to see what happens. But like i said if it's all rigged - which it does seem it is much like casino's then ... there really isn't much point.

Peace.

 

[blitzed]

hiya roger, man that is a real bummer coming from you!

yup, does not look like many winners on your Keno game lately...I skimmed some of NOV results, on 30-Nov-2011 apparently three people? each won $100k on Encore at 1 in 1,111,111 odds.

DART does in fact keep track of what is played...at one point they shared a list of common combos for some games:
http://www.olg.ca/about/public_disclosure/ticket_selections.jsp

lotteries should be required to be transparent, at the very least we should be able to see a bird's eye view of payouts without jumping through hoops...California Lottery actually offers this digest of the latest results, I just wish it showed the losers and revenue vs. payouts heh!
http://www.calottery.com/Media/Downloads/printerfriendly.htm

later,
blitzed

 

[Give me a break]

Roger.www is what I put in my subject as I couldn't figure out how to message him via this site it wasn't meant to confuse - so you can be rest assured it's not him bumming you out but me haha

I would love to see them hold the draw with a simple wheel mechanism with hand drawn ping bong balls ... I believe if they did it this way all of the sudden thousands of people would be like WOW i won! Instead of - wow olg's computer streamlined all the numbers so they only had to pay out 5 grand tonight.

I realize if the Ogc was approached they would say .. no no no but I'm looking at the results and saying yes yes yes. I think if it were a real odds game there would be a longer list of big payouts.

Yes I could just be disgruntled from achieving nothing big in the past but there could also be some truth to my suspicions. The same way I have suspicions that cancer research loves to gobble up cash despite the fact there are some very simple not well known cures out there for the disease.

But why stop the gobble machine - it all goes to a good cause is what justifies the theft.

I just wish a company would challenge the olg to some tests and I don't mean an internal company ... even an external would probably be bought out - maybe the mythbusters could help haha

ah well,
ciao for now.

 

[blitzed]

hiya "Give me a break", funny...my mind is mush today

compare some test sets to past draws to see how they would have performed.

let's see how a test spectrum set from my page woulda performed tonight:
http://crazynuts.hollosite.com/keno_lottery_picks/

02 05 08 12 14
15 17 25 27 30
33 38 40 41 42
47 48 55 57 60

wow! a "5 of 6" (assuming the lottery draw would have been legit)
11 30 31 48 51 60
16 40 43 54 55 58
07 10 14 52 59 65
13 24 28 56 67 70
05 25 27 32 41 57
01 08 15 17 35 46
06 12 18 34 42 63
02 22 36 44 64 66
19 26 37 50 61 62
04 09 23 29 38 49
03 20 21 39 47 69
33 53

cheers!
blitzed

 

[millionaire2b]

1Winner Last Nite--6/6@$10 Bet

I've been considering playing category 6 for 10 dollars daily to see what happens. But like i said if it's all rigged - which it does seem it is much like casino's then ... there really isn't much point.

Peace.

Noticed in last night's draw there was 1 winner 6/6 @ $1.00 bet($1k) and 1 winner 6/6 @ $10 bet($10k)
Any chance that was you?

 

[coppa23]

this is simple monkey bussniss !!!!
house has to make $$$ not us
way not live public drawing on tv ?

 

[blitzed]

conduct lottery draws in a swimming pool....drop the numbered lotto balls form a net above...dolphins & seals could play a game in the water to toss the draw out of the pool.

even if they did manage to cheat somehow, at least it would be entertaining...especially if they had bikini gals too...I mean really, they should be doing something for all the money they rake in right? bastards.

later,
blitzed

 

[mikkii]

so you have to spend 11.00 bucks

hiya "Give me a break", funny...my mind is mush today

compare some test sets to past draws to see how they would have performed.

let's see how a test spectrum set from my page woulda performed tonight:
http://crazynuts.hollosite.com/keno_lottery_picks/

02 05 08 12 14
15 17 25 27 30
33 38 40 41 42
47 48 55 57 60

wow! a "5 of 6" (assuming the lottery draw would have been legit)
11 30 31 48 51 60
16 40 43 54 55 58
07 10 14 52 59 65
13 24 28 56 67 70
05 25 27 32 41 57
01 08 15 17 35 46
06 12 18 34 42 63
02 22 36 44 64 66
19 26 37 50 61 62
04 09 23 29 38 49
03 20 21 39 47 69
33 53

cheers!
blitzed

to try to match 6 numbers

 

[blitzed]

to try to match 6 numbers

hiya mikkii, yeah ifya wanted to play a full test set, and have the whole numberfield in play.

I use such spectrum sets as a starting point...shuffle numbers around, filter out some I dislike, boildown to a smaller set which is more practical to play.

cya,
blitzed

 

[mikkii]

smaller set would be like 4 numbers or 5?

 

[blitzed]

smaller set would be like 4 numbers or 5?

hiya mikkii, I would boil down 4 to 6 lines...it all depends upon budget and how oftenya play....if I don't play a game for a long time though, I like a full spectrum set, so at least I have the whole number range in play...cuz it sucks to look at a draw and a few picks, and think, "son of a bitch! not a single number!" heh!

later,
blitzed

 

[coppa23]

Mr Commissioner

you did it tonight
do it tomorrow again

imagine playing 45 number comb and nothing
In 45 number catch only 3 of them