robert perkis: lottery concepts - computers

[Paul_b]

Just been looking at the following passage from robert perkis article here.

Computer method with weight factor. Write down all the
numbers your system uses. Star all numbers that hit in the
last four or five drawings. Double star all numbers that hit
in the last drawing. In the first round, bypass all numbers
with stars. In the second round, only bypass numbers with
double stars. From here on, heads, keep it and tails cross it
out. Continue until reduced to the 5, 6, or 7 needed for play.
Repeat for each ticket.

* THIS SYSTEM IS SO GOOD YOU HAD BETTER ORDER TODAY BEFORE
THEY ARE FORCED TO SHUT DOWN THE LOTTERY* *WE DON'T KNOW HOW
MUCH LONGER THE GOVERNMENT WILL ALLOW US TO KEEP SELLING THIS
SYSTEM* *LOTTERY SECRETS OF THE ANCIENT (YOUR CHOICE)
REVEALED* Really? (From my collection of Headlines.)​

I dont quite follow what robert is saying. Can anybody help?

When robert says star all numbers drawn in the last 4-5 draws. Is this inclusive of the last draw? If so, doesnt this conflict with the double star? Or is a matter that I need to eliminate(bypass) all numbers with stars and double stars?

Has anybody tried this? and what did they find?

 

[northlight]

Just been looking at the following passage from robert perkis article here.

Computer method with weight factor. Write down all the
numbers your system uses. Star all numbers that hit in the
last four or five drawings. Double star all numbers that hit
in the last drawing. In the first round, bypass all numbers
with stars. In the second round, only bypass numbers with
double stars. From here on, heads, keep it and tails cross it
out. Continue until reduced to the 5, 6, or 7 needed for play.
Repeat for each ticket.

* THIS SYSTEM IS SO GOOD YOU HAD BETTER ORDER TODAY BEFORE
THEY ARE FORCED TO SHUT DOWN THE LOTTERY* *WE DON'T KNOW HOW
MUCH LONGER THE GOVERNMENT WILL ALLOW US TO KEEP SELLING THIS
SYSTEM* *LOTTERY SECRETS OF THE ANCIENT (YOUR CHOICE)
REVEALED* Really? (From my collection of Headlines.)​

I dont quite follow what robert is saying. Can anybody help?

When robert says star all numbers drawn in the last 4-5 draws. Is this inclusive of the last draw? If so, doesnt this conflict with the double star? Or is a matter that I need to eliminate(bypass) all numbers with stars and double stars?

Has anybody tried this? and what did they find?

Just quickly read what you quoted, not go through whole paper yet;I feel confusing too, if single stars and double stars need to be elemited, why do it by two times? why don't elemite them all together at one time?
And more, I don't understand "From here on, heads, keep it and tails cross it
out. Continue until reduced to the 5, 6, or 7 needed for play.
Repeat for each ticket.", can you explain if you know?

 

[northlight]

Just quickly read what you quoted, not go through whole paper yet;I feel confusing too, if single stars and double stars need to be elemited, why do it by two times? why don't elemite them all together at one time?
And more, I don't understand "From here on, heads, keep it and tails cross it
out. Continue until reduced to the 5, 6, or 7 needed for play.
Repeat for each ticket.", can you explain if you know?

Reading on it, it is a really good article espectially for pick 3, but for lott, this method is not cleared.

 

[Paul_b]

Thanks for replying northlight,

I am glad somebody else didnt understand this. I thought it was me! Interested that Robert should quote this SYSTEM IS SO GOOD, yet he hasnt thoroughly explain it. Maybe Robert didnt think this wouldnt appeal to all the real players. May ha might reply to this thread. Its a pity that such a statement should be stated when this is probably the most none methodical and random number strategy he has mentioned!

I will have a look at the pick 3. Just quickly scanned through it and it looks like there are a number strategies on how to pick number sets. Wonder if people still use these? And are making a profit?

 

[northlight]

Thanks for replying northlight,

I am glad somebody else didnt understand this. I thought it was me! Interested that Robert should quote this SYSTEM IS SO GOOD, yet he hasnt thoroughly explain it. Maybe Robert didnt think this wouldnt appeal to all the real players. May ha might reply to this thread. Its a pity that such a statement should be stated when this is probably the most none methodical and random number strategy he has mentioned!

I will have a look at the pick 3. Just quickly scanned through it and it looks like there are a number strategies on how to pick number sets. Wonder if people still use these? And are making a profit?

Right, his idea for picking 649 is not GUESS/Predict number, it is make a "pure" random numbers to be trap, it sounds more reasonable than prediction work, I would probabely try it, but the confusing is still why not to elimate past five lines directly, otherthan firstly pass 5 lines, then second time pass the last draw? it is no point to do twice. any clue?

For pick3, I did few back test, sometime work, sometime no, it is better than nothing.

 

[Paul_b]

With your back test, did you make any profit?

 

[Paul_b]

Just been looking at the following passage from robert perkis article here.

Computer method with weight factor. Write down all the
numbers your system uses. Star all numbers that hit in the
last four or five drawings. Double star all numbers that hit
in the last drawing. In the first round, bypass all numbers
with stars. In the second round, only bypass numbers with
double stars. From here on, heads, keep it and tails cross it
out. Continue until reduced to the 5, 6, or 7 needed for play.
Repeat for each ticket.

* THIS SYSTEM IS SO GOOD YOU HAD BETTER ORDER TODAY BEFORE
THEY ARE FORCED TO SHUT DOWN THE LOTTERY* *WE DON'T KNOW HOW
MUCH LONGER THE GOVERNMENT WILL ALLOW US TO KEEP SELLING THIS
SYSTEM* *LOTTERY SECRETS OF THE ANCIENT (YOUR CHOICE)
REVEALED* Really? (From my collection of Headlines.)​

I dont quite follow what robert is saying. Can anybody help?

When robert says star all numbers drawn in the last 4-5 draws. Is this inclusive of the last draw? If so, doesnt this conflict with the double star? Or is a matter that I need to eliminate(bypass) all numbers with stars and double stars?

Has anybody tried this? and what did they find?

Just read this again and think that I may have worked it out. I think you need to star all the numbers in 4-5 draws, but not the last draw. Then double star all numbers from the last draw. Hope this makes sense. Then follow roberts notes for eliminating the starred numbers.

You end up with table ranging from 0-3 stars. You keep the really hot(3 stars) and cold numbers(0-no stars) then again follow his notes.

I will back test this(hopefully later) and post my results.

 

[northlight]

Just read this again and think that I may have worked it out. I think you need to star all the numbers in 4-5 draws, but not the last draw. Then double star all numbers from the last draw. Hope this makes sense. Then follow roberts notes for eliminating the starred numbers.

You end up with table ranging from 0-3 stars. You keep the really hot(3 stars) and cold numbers(0-no stars) then again follow his notes.

I will back test this(hopefully later) and post my results.

Thanks for explain, sounds reasonable, I will try when get it, may ask you if not work out.

for my back test for pick 3, I found some theroy works(for example first 3), but the thing is it only work at certian time, need to figure out when we can use it, when to wait. that is hard. I am trying to find it out......

 

[Paul_b]

Hi,

Just back tested the previous ~1000 UK lottery results with roberts theory. I have only tested part of his strategy. Upto the hot and cold number selection. My theory being if this isnt working then theres no point including the remainding random selection theory. I have included my results below and note that each result I have only matched the maximum number. This means that there maybe mutiple smaller wins within this, but for me its the maximum matches that I am interested in. Also I have included the results for the balls that are not part of the selected balls(ie the other balls). These are basically the balls that came out in draws 2 - 6.

really hot & cold last 5 draws
oneBallsMatched 69 90

twoBallsMatched 206 253

threeBallsMatched 334 334

fourBallsMatched 253 206

fiveBallsMatched 90 69

sixBallsMatched 17 11

Average number of balls selected per draw 25.2243
23.7757

At this moment its difficult to draw any real conclusion apart from the fact there does appear to be some kind of weighting towards roberts theory. But for me there isnt a huge weighting to say this theory will pick you the winning balls. Any comments please.

I will try the random part later.

 

[Paul_b]

Sorry about the presentation of the previous results. Here they are again.

For the really hot & cold numbers
oneBallsMatched 69
twoBallsMatched 206
threeBallsMatched 334
fourBallsMatched 253
fiveBallsMatched 90
sixBallsMatched 17
Average number of balls selected per draw 25.2243

For the last 5 draws numbers
oneBallsMatched 90
twoBallsMatched 253
threeBallsMatched 334
fourBallsMatched 206
fiveBallsMatched 69
sixBallsMatched 11
Average number of balls selected per draw 23.7757

 

[higgy]

The idea here is to get you to look at the natural flow of numbers.How is each draw made up compared to the previous draw.Human Beings are creatures of habit,we see patterns in every aspect of our lives Even in events that are completely random we see patterns. Take the following draw list from a Pa cash 5 game in 2005 as an example. In particular look at the number 4

4 19 21 27 36
9 10 11 12 31
12 24 26 27 35
11 15 17 32 37
5 12 17 20 27
4 12 17 24 33
14 21 26 30 39
3 4 21 24 36
6 12 21 31 38
15 19 22 23 24
5 6 15 35 39
18 22 23 27 31
4 8 19 25 36
8 10 15 18 23
1 3 18 24 33

The number 4 occurs by itself 4 out of 15 draws or 27 %
in combination with other numbers it occurs 13 out of 15 or 87%

Is this usefull information you'll have to decide for yourself