Re: "Announcers" - detailed definition?

[gsobier]

For your own protection Mirage, it is best you do not know what goes on in the inner circle.

 

[mirage]

(Originally posted by Peter)

For your own protection Mirage, it is best you do not know what goes on in the inner circle.

I agree!

 

[thornc]

In short, there is no proof since it is assumed as true in order to simplify (or in this case, allow) calculations.

So that's why I could not find it... it's one of those simplifications tricks we keep doing in math!

...and for those who wonder why mathies troll these forums - you can use math / stats to help you play smarter (at least in math/stats terms) - but it is more of a case of maximizing winning potential while minimizing cost

And what do you think everyone else here is doing? They just go about doing it in their one personnal way!

 

[Rob50]

About man going to moon!

This is good, but I know another as good as this.

There are still some people trying to build a perpetuum mobile.
Lots have tried to for more than 300 years already.
Not far from the first step of that well developed science, though!

It is up to everyone to decide whether the LOTTOSCIENCE is "man to the moon" or "perpetuum mobile".

With all due respect for the inner circle!