Ques for line-reading experts.

[SHT]

Ques for ‘line-reading’ experts.

Ques for Gilles and any other ‘line-reading’ experts.

Dear Gilles and any other ‘line-reading’ experts,

My questions stems from something Gilles posted in the 649 tips and strategies tread, in response to the publication of the OP’s 400 lines.

>>>I can think of several combinations that would not be very good.

I confess I don’t usually know what you are hinting at, but to be fair, I am a newbie to ‘line building’.

I was hoping you could possibly look at a 400 lines extract from a wheel I produced a while ago, and apply the same critical eye that you applied to the OP’s combinations. Below I have posted a 400 line extract from a 54,000 wheel, produced by standard filtering and immature prediction strategy for the UK 6/49.

Additional information about extract/54,000 wheel you may need, so you can ignore when examining the 400 lines.

1) Bankers: The 400 line extract may seem like it is using bankers but this is not the case.

2) Positional limits: Too convoluted & wish-washy to explain now, but I have not applied any positional limits and will not be using this particular filtering criteria for the foreseeable future. PLEASE IGNORE.

3) Optimizing/Abbreviating/Guarantees: The 54,000 wheel has not been optimized. I have absolutely no interest in optimizing the wheel for smaller (3/4/5) prizes.

4) Gaps distribution patterns: I have filtered for gaps, but I haven’t screened for oddities/extremes in gap distribution patterns. (I haven’t yet read that part of the text book!)

5) LD distribution patterns: I have filtered for LD, but I haven’t screened for oddities/extremes in LD distribution patterns. (Another chapter of the text book still to read!)

6) Validity: The combinations/lines of my generated wheel change for every draw because of the nature of the date dependant (dynamic) filters and predictive systems. Since the 400 line extract is from an older wheel, interpretations of the relationship of individual numbers to recent history are not valid. I not sure if that sounded like gobbledygook, so I will give a simple example: A line may contain 2/3/4… repeats from the last UK draw DrID 995 22/06/4005, you can ignore things like this because this wheel is not valid for Sat 25th June draw.

Any thoughts?

01 03 19 24 35 36
01 03 20 24 35 36
01 03 21 24 36 47
01 03 21 24 38 47
01 03 22 24 36 47
01 06 11 24 28 47
01 06 11 24 40 47
01 06 21 24 39 43
01 06 21 24 39 47
01 06 23 24 39 42
01 06 23 24 39 43
01 06 23 24 40 47
01 06 23 24 42 47
01 08 20 24 30 47
01 08 20 24 31 36
01 08 23 24 40 47
01 08 23 24 42 47
01 09 10 24 28 47
01 09 10 24 29 47
01 09 17 24 42 43
01 09 19 24 26 41
01 09 19 24 26 43
01 09 19 24 28 36
01 15 23 24 31 36
01 15 23 24 32 36
01 15 23 24 33 36
01 17 19 24 26 36
01 17 19 24 27 36
01 19 23 24 30 36
01 19 23 24 32 36
01 19 23 24 33 36
02 03 21 24 36 48
02 03 21 24 38 48
02 06 14 24 35 37
02 06 15 24 35 37
02 06 21 24 41 48
02 06 21 24 42 47
02 06 21 24 43 48
02 06 22 24 31 35
02 06 22 24 35 37
02 06 22 24 35 41
02 06 22 24 35 43
02 07 21 24 36 48
02 08 14 24 35 37
02 08 15 24 33 35
02 08 23 24 39 42
02 08 23 24 39 48
02 09 10 24 28 47
02 09 10 24 29 48
02 09 10 24 35 37
02 10 19 24 33 35
02 10 20 24 35 37
02 10 22 24 35 37
03 09 20 24 38 49
03 09 20 24 43 49
03 09 21 24 41 48
03 09 21 24 43 48
03 09 23 24 38 49
03 10 14 24 35 36
03 10 14 24 35 38
03 10 15 24 29 36
03 10 15 24 30 35
03 10 19 24 33 35
03 10 19 24 35 38
03 10 19 24 40 49
03 10 20 24 35 36
03 10 20 24 35 38
03 10 22 24 35 36
03 10 22 24 35 38
03 10 23 24 35 38
03 11 21 24 35 38
03 12 14 24 29 35
03 12 14 24 35 38
03 12 15 24 27 36
03 12 15 24 28 35
03 12 15 24 31 38
03 12 17 24 26 35
03 12 17 24 35 38
03 12 17 24 40 49
03 12 18 24 26 35
03 12 18 24 27 35
03 12 18 24 40 49
03 12 19 24 25 35
03 12 19 24 35 36
03 12 19 24 35 38
03 12 20 24 35 36
03 12 20 24 35 38
03 12 21 24 35 36
03 12 21 24 35 38
03 12 22 24 35 36
03 12 22 24 35 38
03 12 23 24 35 38
03 13 14 24 26 38
03 13 14 24 27 36
03 13 14 24 28 35
03 13 14 24 35 38
03 13 15 24 25 38
03 13 15 24 25 42
03 13 15 24 26 36
03 13 15 24 26 38
03 13 15 24 26 42
03 13 15 24 28 36
03 13 15 24 30 35
03 13 15 24 32 35
03 13 15 24 32 36
03 13 15 24 34 38
03 13 15 24 35 36
03 13 15 24 35 38
03 13 15 24 42 48
03 13 15 24 42 49
03 13 18 24 26 35
03 13 18 24 26 36
03 13 18 24 26 38
03 13 18 24 28 42
03 13 18 24 30 35
03 13 18 24 30 36
03 13 18 24 30 38
03 13 18 24 32 36
03 13 18 24 32 38
03 13 18 24 35 36
03 13 18 24 35 38
03 17 22 24 32 38
03 17 22 24 34 36
03 17 22 24 34 38
03 17 22 24 35 36
03 17 22 24 35 38
03 18 19 24 26 36
03 18 19 24 27 36
03 18 19 24 32 36
03 18 19 24 32 38
03 18 19 24 33 36
06 15 19 24 32 39
06 15 19 24 34 38
06 15 19 24 34 39
06 15 20 24 31 38
06 15 20 24 31 39
06 15 22 24 31 38
06 15 22 24 31 39
10 15 17 24 35 43
10 15 17 24 35 49
10 15 17 24 36 42
10 15 17 24 38 49
10 15 17 24 40 49
10 15 17 24 41 49
12 15 21 24 43 47
12 15 23 24 40 47
12 17 18 24 30 47
12 17 18 24 35 47
12 17 21 24 40 47
12 18 19 24 30 47
12 18 19 24 35 47
12 18 19 24 36 47
12 18 21 24 40 47
12 18 21 24 41 47
12 18 23 24 40 47

09 10 13 15 30 42
09 10 13 15 31 42
09 10 14 28 41 48
09 10 15 17 34 42
09 10 15 24 29 48
09 10 15 25 29 42
09 10 17 24 40 42
09 10 17 26 28 42
09 10 18 20 28 41
09 10 18 31 35 41
09 10 19 21 28 42
09 10 19 25 40 42
09 10 20 25 43 48
09 10 22 26 43 48
09 10 23 25 42 49
09 10 24 28 41 48
09 11 14 18 31 48
09 11 14 31 39 48
09 11 18 24 27 41
09 11 24 40 47 48
09 11 28 40 41 48
09 12 13 17 32 48
09 12 14 17 32 49
09 12 14 19 30 48
09 12 14 21 27 41
09 12 14 29 40 48
09 12 14 29 47 48
09 12 15 22 41 49
09 12 17 18 30 48
09 12 17 19 33 48
09 12 17 31 35 48
09 12 18 27 28 41
09 12 18 31 39 41
09 12 19 21 40 41
09 12 21 27 40 41
09 12 23 24 43 49
09 12 23 28 40 41
09 12 24 25 43 49
09 12 26 28 43 48
09 12 30 32 41 48
09 12 31 33 41 48
09 13 14 24 29 42
09 13 14 24 41 49
09 13 15 24 26 42
09 13 15 25 26 42
09 13 15 30 33 42
09 13 17 32 33 48
09 13 18 19 35 42
09 13 20 23 42 48
09 13 22 25 41 48
09 13 24 27 42 49
09 13 25 27 42 48
09 13 25 28 41 42
09 14 15 19 32 41
09 14 15 30 39 41
09 14 17 32 38 48
09 14 18 19 36 42
09 14 18 23 28 41
09 14 19 22 25 41
09 14 21 24 43 49
09 14 21 27 43 48
09 14 23 40 43 49
09 14 26 27 43 49
09 14 28 42 43 48
09 14 30 36 47 48
09 15 17 22 40 41
09 15 17 24 28 41
09 15 19 31 36 42
09 15 22 28 40 41
09 15 23 28 41 42
09 15 24 40 41 48
09 15 33 36 43 48
09 17 18 24 27 41
09 17 20 27 43 48
09 17 21 24 40 41
09 17 25 28 40 41
09 17 30 40 41 48
09 17 32 40 41 48
09 18 21 24 40 41
09 18 21 26 41 49
09 18 22 40 41 49
09 18 24 27 41 42
09 18 24 43 47 49
09 18 28 40 43 49
09 18 31 41 42 49
09 18 32 38 41 49
09 19 21 28 40 41
09 19 30 32 43 48
09 19 30 33 40 41
09 19 33 38 42 48
09 20 23 34 43 48
09 20 23 38 42 49
09 20 23 40 41 49
09 20 26 33 43 48
09 20 27 30 43 49
09 20 27 37 40 41
09 20 27 42 43 48
09 20 29 32 41 48
09 20 30 41 42 48
09 20 31 36 40 41
09 21 24 36 40 41
09 21 24 36 47 48
09 21 26 32 43 48
09 21 27 34 41 42
09 21 28 38 41 42
09 22 23 34 41 48
09 22 24 34 43 49
09 22 26 31 43 48
09 22 27 32 41 48
09 22 28 38 43 49
09 22 31 38 40 49
09 23 24 32 43 48
09 23 24 34 43 48
09 23 27 34 40 41
09 23 34 38 41 42
09 24 26 32 41 49
09 24 26 40 41 49
09 24 28 36 40 41
09 24 29 35 40 41
09 24 31 35 43 48

17 18 20 24 43 49
17 18 20 27 43 49
17 18 20 28 43 49
17 18 20 33 36 49
17 18 20 33 38 49
17 18 21 24 43 49
17 18 21 26 41 49
17 18 21 26 43 49
17 18 21 28 41 49
17 18 21 30 38 49
17 18 21 31 38 49
17 18 21 32 38 49
17 18 21 33 36 49
17 19 21 30 38 49
17 19 21 34 38 49
17 19 22 30 36 49
17 19 22 30 38 49
17 19 22 32 36 49
17 19 22 32 38 49
17 19 22 34 36 49
17 19 22 34 38 49
17 19 24 30 38 49
17 19 24 32 38 49
17 19 24 34 38 49
17 20 21 30 38 49
17 20 21 32 38 49
17 20 21 33 38 49
17 20 21 34 38 49
17 20 22 32 38 49
17 20 22 34 36 49
17 20 22 35 36 49
17 20 22 35 38 49
17 20 22 36 37 49
17 20 22 36 38 49
17 20 22 36 39 49
17 20 22 37 38 49
17 20 22 38 39 49
17 20 23 30 38 49
17 20 23 32 38 49
17 20 23 33 36 49
17 20 23 34 38 49
17 20 23 35 38 49
17 20 23 36 38 49
17 20 23 36 39 49
17 20 24 30 38 49
17 20 24 31 36 49
17 20 24 31 38 49
17 20 24 32 36 49
17 20 24 37 38 49
17 20 24 38 39 49
17 20 25 30 38 49
17 20 25 31 36 49
17 20 25 32 38 49
17 20 25 33 38 49
17 21 22 30 38 49
17 21 22 31 38 49
17 21 22 32 38 49
17 21 22 34 38 49
17 21 22 35 38 49
17 21 22 36 38 49
17 21 22 36 39 49
17 21 24 30 38 49
17 21 24 32 38 49
17 21 24 33 38 49
17 21 24 35 38 49
17 21 24 36 38 49
17 21 27 32 38 49
17 21 28 30 38 49
17 21 28 31 38 49
17 21 28 32 38 49
17 21 28 33 36 49
17 21 28 34 38 49
17 21 29 30 38 49
17 22 23 30 38 49
17 22 28 31 36 49
17 22 28 31 38 49
17 22 28 32 36 49
17 22 29 30 36 49
17 22 29 30 38 49
17 22 29 32 36 49
17 22 29 32 38 49
17 22 29 34 36 49
17 22 29 34 38 49
17 23 24 30 38 49
17 23 24 32 38 49
17 23 24 33 36 49
17 23 24 33 38 49
17 23 24 34 38 49
17 23 24 36 38 49
17 23 25 30 38 49
17 23 25 32 38 49
17 23 26 30 38 49
17 23 26 32 38 49
17 23 26 33 36 49
17 23 26 34 38 49
17 23 27 30 38 49
17 23 28 30 38 49
17 23 28 32 38 49
17 23 28 34 38 49
17 24 25 30 38 49
17 24 25 31 36 49

 

[SHT]

17 24 25 31 38 49
17 24 25 32 38 49
17 24 25 33 36 49
17 24 26 30 36 49
17 24 26 30 38 49
17 24 26 31 36 49
17 24 26 31 38 49
17 24 26 32 36 49
17 24 27 32 36 49
17 24 27 32 38 49
17 24 27 34 36 49
17 24 27 34 38 49
17 24 28 30 36 49
17 24 28 31 36 49
17 24 28 31 38 49
17 24 28 33 36 49
17 24 28 33 38 49
17 24 28 34 38 49
17 24 29 30 36 49
17 24 29 30 38 49
17 24 29 32 36 49
17 24 29 32 38 49
17 24 29 33 38 49
17 24 29 34 36 49

(Gilles, I think I should let you know, I removed references to yourself, and posted this question in another forum. I hope you don’t mind, I value you input, but the more evaluations/opinions will help me learn quicker {and win that jackpot quicker!!!})

All evaluations and input highly appreciated.
SHTH.

 

[GillesD]

Not very good lines

SHT

My comment about "I can think of several combinations that would not be very good" was in reference to a previous post with 400 lines.

I can not say a specific combination is good or bad by itself as I believe any combination (yes even 1-2-3-4-5-6) as a chance of coming out.

To get 3 winning numbers, you can manage with only 163 6-number combinations but to get all 6 winning numbers, you will need 13,983,816 combinations. Even removing the last winning combination would leave you with a small risk of losing everything should it repeat.

 

[SHT]

Re: Not very good lines

Hi Gilles,

I knew you were referring to another post in a different thread, which is what prompted my question.

<fx:scratches head>

Can you please elaborate on what you meant by your statement in the '649 tips and strategies' thread?

<SNIPPED>
Your statement "the whole complete set of 400 lines which should guarantee five plus the bonus number and/or the jackpot" should be written with a very big SHOULD. It may happen since nothing is impossible but I can think of several combinations that would not be very good. It is a good chance you did not...

 

[GillesD]

My reply

When somebody makes a statement like "the whole complete set of 400 lines which should guarantee five plus the bonus number and/or the jackpot", it should be proven as such, even if it is written with a "should". And I tend to verify closely these types of statements.

My comment was made to indicate that there were quite a few combinations that would not fulfill the guarantee of 5+ and even many, many that would show no winning numbers. At least the known 163 combinations assure you a minimum of 3 wiinning numbers.

 

[SHT]

Re: My reply

When somebody makes a statement like "the whole complete set of 400 lines which should guarantee five plus the bonus number and/or the jackpot", it should be proven as such, even if it is written with a "should". And I tend to verify closely these types of statements.

My comment was made to indicate that there were quite a few combinations that would not fulfill the guarantee of 5+ and even many, many that would show no winning numbers. At least the known 163 combinations assure you a minimum of 3 wiinning numbers.

Thanks for the clarification. I thought there maybe a slight chance you were referring to the abbreviation, but I was hoping you were commenting on the make-up of the individual lines. Anyway thanks for your responses.

 

[SHT]

There's one thing I can't get my head around...

<SNIPPED>
I can not say a specific combination is good or bad by itself as I believe any combination (yes even 1-2-3-4-5-6) as a chance of coming out...

Gilles I’m not trying to be an upstart, but just one moot point…

In this thread you have briefly expressed your belief that any combination has a chance of coming out. I have also noticed in this forum you have hypothesized on numerous occasions about ‘unlikely combinations’ being as valid as any other number.

There are many better qualified to debate the opposing opinion, and have done so for over a decade.

My problem is this, if you truly believe this, then even the slightest piece of lottery data collection, analysis, statistical investigation or wheeling is totally pointless?! Even a player writing the draw history on a piece of paper is wasting their time?!

This forum would be a pointless exercise?!

Every commercial software seller, even the highly respected ‘Lottery Guru Designers’ would be snake oil peddlers?!

And why do you generously expend time and energy assisting individuals with coding & statistics for something that ultimately is meaningless and irrelevant?! I’m sure there are other hobbies where you could develop your VBA/Excell skills and still analyse the numbers?!

In fact the only useful exercise I could see for players holding your beliefs, would be to select numbers randomly and abbreviate for whatever prize level and guarantee they were interested in, or purchase Quickpicks.


<fx:scratches head>
<fx:grins>

Have you stumbled across something, and are trying to throw us of the scent?!!!!

Rhetorical questions really. Just thinking aloud Gilles, no offence meant.

 

[Rob50]

Re: There's one thing I can't get my head around...

.. the slightest piece of lottery data collection, analysis, statistical investigation or wheeling is totally pointless?! Even a player writing the draw history on a piece of paper is wasting their time?!

This forum would be a pointless exercise?!

Every commercial software seller, even the highly respected ‘Lottery Guru Designers’ would be snake oil peddlers?!

Well said SHT. Finally you see clearly. Just keep it this way. Better hopeless, than with a false hope

 

[Grandmaster]

Well said SHT. Finally you see clearly. Just keep it this way. Better hopeless, than with a false hope

I don't agree.

Lotto is predictable by many ways.

Regards

 

[GillesD]

Random vs predictable lottery

SHT

In your last post, you make some valid points regarding my position. Yes there two schools of thought on lotteries: those who say that you can predict lottery results (but have not achieved it on a regular basis except one former member here) and those who say that it is random (although not perfectly so) enough to make it unpredictable. And I am in this last group. Oh yes, there are also those who say lotteries are controlled by the various lottery organizations, but then why play lotteries.

Why am I losing so much time playing around with lottery statistics? Well, it my line of work, statistics play a large role and quite early in the Canadian Lotto 6/49, I realized that everybody knew about lotteries and such data could be used to demonstrate many statistical concept (distribution, real world results vs theorical values, central limit theorem, etc.). So I started collecting data on Lotto 6/49 and using it in courses I gave. Everybody at least understood what I was talking about and it generated some attention (especially useful on such a dry subject as statistics).

Then with Excel, it allowed me to develop my skills in that program and the return on my investment for the time passed on lottery statistics had been much greater than any win I could have made playing lottery. I have to use Excel on a regular basis to analyze data and what I learned when playing around with lottery data is put in practice on a regular basis. And I love the challenge to find a way to determine a specific statistic or answer some other questions raised here.

Yes it is possible to make money with lotteries (with no luck involved) and it is so easy: Make a lottery software and sell it. As far as I am concerned, I sure hope to win but my chances are remote: I usually play one combination per draw (the same 6 numbers randomly chosen some years back). But then my losses are small.

So I hope this answers some of your questions. It is so much fun discussing these things when done in a civilized manner.

 

[Rob50]

Wise answer Gilles. Fully agree with it.

 

[Rob50]

Grandmaster, can you give some more arguments, rather than just say "Lottery is predictable", or an example of succesful prediction?

Do you have winnings significantly higher than the odds?

 

[bloubul]

Ques for Gilles and any other "line-reading" experts

Hi Grandmaster,

Grandmaster, will you explain youre arguments with facts, rather than just say "Lottery is predictable", and include a few examples of succesful prediction?

This will be very interesting.

BlouBul

 

[SHT]

Re: Random vs predictable lottery

SHT

In your last post, you make some valid points regarding my position. Yes there two schools of thought on lotteries: those who say that you can predict lottery results (but have not achieved it on a regular basis except one former member here) and those who say that it is random (although not perfectly so) enough to make it unpredictable. And I am in this last group. Oh yes, there are also those who say lotteries are controlled by the various lottery organizations, but then why play lotteries.

Why am I losing so much time playing around with lottery statistics? Well, it my line of work, statistics play a large role and quite early in the Canadian Lotto 6/49, I realized that everybody knew about lotteries and such data could be used to demonstrate many statistical concept (distribution, real world results vs theorical values, central limit theorem, etc.). So I started collecting data on Lotto 6/49 and using it in courses I gave. Everybody at least understood what I was talking about and it generated some attention (especially useful on such a dry subject as statistics).

Then with Excel, it allowed me to develop my skills in that program and the return on my investment for the time passed on lottery statistics had been much greater than any win I could have made playing lottery. I have to use Excel on a regular basis to analyze data and what I learned when playing around with lottery data is put in practice on a regular basis. And I love the challenge to find a way to determine a specific statistic or answer some other questions raised here.

Yes it is possible to make money with lotteries (with no luck involved) and it is so easy: Make a lottery software and sell it. As far as I am concerned, I sure hope to win but my chances are remote: I usually play one combination per draw (the same 6 numbers randomly chosen some years back). But then my losses are small.

So I hope this answers some of your questions. It is so much fun discussing these things when done in a civilized manner.

Hi Gilles

Sorry for the delay in response, yesterday was the first time I’d been back to the boards and I didn’t have time to hang around.

I’m glad you took my post in the spirit it was intended. My post wasn’t personally about you justifying yourself but more about if an individual holds your views, that every combination has a chance of appearing, and by implication every number has an equal chance of appearing. This could only mean that thousands of serious lottery players are misguided fools.

I knew you were an Industrial Statistician, but I didn’t know you prepare and give classes in statistics. Using the lottery is the backbone of both statistics and programming tutorials. Your position makes perfect sense now. Excuse my ignorance.

2 follow-up points:

Yes it is possible to make money with lotteries (with no luck involved) and it is so easy: Make a lottery software and sell it.

Just being mischievous by highlighting this statement.

SHT
In your last post, you make some valid points regarding my position. Yes there two schools of thought on lotteries: those who say that you can predict lottery results (but have not achieved it on a regular basis except one former member here) and those who say that it is random (although not perfectly so) enough to make it unpredictable. And I am in this last group. Oh yes, there are also those who say lotteries are controlled by the various lottery organizations, but then why play lotteries.

So the former would have to predict correct lottery results on a regular basis before one could say the lottery is predictable?! But what if individuals were capable of making occasional predictions at dates of their choosing, not wildish 15 number guesses but tight 4-7 number predictions that were regularly on the button. Would the latter school of thought still say that the lottery is “random enough to make it unpredictable” and they were just lucky?

SHTH

 

[SHT]

LOL we must agree to differ

Rob50

Sorry Rob50 but I was just playing devils advocate, I’m still on the fence when it comes to the validity of ‘unlikely combinations’.

Well said SHT. Finally you see clearly. Just keep it this way. Better hopeless, than with a false hope


__________________
Just play quick-picks. It is official: you'll have the same chance to hit a jackpot, as if you play the numbers that some prophet predicted!

Wrong, Wrong all wrong. <fx:smile>

I’m the last person to think it’s a waste of energy analysing the lottery. If you have the right scenarios then good predictive strategies and selective statistical analysis can pay off. It just a matter of the individual player finding their natural territory. As Grandmaster so mysteriously hinted the “lotto is predictable in many ways”.

I’m a total novice when it comes to statistically analysing and determining the parameters of a lottery, and using this information to generate combinations that fit certain criteria. So I’m not sure about the rationality of choosing certain combinations because their profiles are more likely to appear as jackpot winning tickets.

SHTH

 

[Rob50]

SHT,

Do you really think that I did not know? I just was being a little sarcastic. That's all. Though I really hope that very soon you will understand where the truth stands, meaning you will be aware that the money you spend playing lottery is paid only to the lady Luck!

As for "misterious" and "mistic" territories I generously will leave these to you, grandmaster and the like.

Cheers!

PS Nevertheless when you'll know misticly and misteriously that you are going to hit the jackpot, please let me know. Just send me a private message.

 

[Grandmaster]

As for "misterious" and "mistic" territories I generously will leave these to you, grandmaster and the like.

Thank you, but I don't use mistic theories, only misterious theories.

PS Nevertheless when you'll know misticly and misteriously that you are going to hit the jackpot, please let me know. Just send me a private message.

I'll keep with my misterious secret "as a personal project" . Sorry but I can't tell you or any other person my advanced theories or gold secrets to win any type of lotto.

Beating odds is more easy than you imagine.

No tips.

Regards

 

[Rob50]

 

[SHT]

Do you really think that I did not know? I just was being a little sarcastic. That's all. Though I really hope that very soon you will understand where the truth stands, meaning you will be aware that the money you spend playing lottery is paid only to the lady Luck!

Who’s Lady Luck? The money from my purchases goes partly to ‘good causes’, government taxation duty and winners.

As for "misterious" and "mistic" territories I generously will leave these to you, grandmaster and the like.

Rob50 you may wish to see it as "misterious" and "mistic" territories. Since I’ve never made any public declarations or claims, I’m just guessing that to find that fertile ground, takes a lot of damn hard work and possibly a certain amount of higher cerebral functioning.

PS Nevertheless when you'll know misticly and misteriously that you are going to hit the jackpot, please let me know. Just send me a private message.

Unfortunately since private messaging is disabled, I don’t think you should expect any private messages from anyone anytime soon.

 

[SHT]

I'll keep with my misterious secret "as a personal project" . Sorry but I can't tell you or any other person my advanced theories or gold secrets to win any type of lotto.

Beating odds is more easy than you imagine.

Some very bold claims Grandmaster.