winkeldinkel
Member
B.C./49 Possibilities....
2-9-11-12-16-17-18-22-23-27-29-34-35-40-47-48
Good Luck Everyone!
2-9-11-12-16-17-18-22-23-27-29-34-35-40-47-48
Good Luck Everyone!
Provincial Picks for September 20th
- Thread starter winkeldinkel
- Start date
Brad
Member
Maggie,
not sure about Combo but I have been rather busy lately, enough so that often I have to resort to the unspeakable QPs. Hopefully things will change for me in about a month or so ... by then I will have forgotten how to crunch
Till then I'm reduced to reading OPPs and making the odd stupid comment.
Won't post my 'random selections'
for tomorrow, but last BC49 draw I got $30 for $5 ... which I re-invested whole into Super7 tonite,
so if you hear a very loud Meaowl you'll know the score
(wishfull thinking)
Good Luck in all your draws
OPP=other ppls posts
not sure about Combo but I have been rather busy lately, enough so that often I have to resort to the unspeakable QPs. Hopefully things will change for me in about a month or so ... by then I will have forgotten how to crunch
Till then I'm reduced to reading OPPs and making the odd stupid comment.
Won't post my 'random selections'
for tomorrow, but last BC49 draw I got $30 for $5 ... which I re-invested whole into Super7 tonite, so if you hear a very loud Meaowl you'll know the score
(wishfull thinking)Good Luck in all your draws
OPP=other ppls posts
ColdhandLuke
Member
1-6-12-13-19-26-34-37-42-46
Wish me luck....I need some...
Wish me luck....I need some...
ComboManiac
Member
TO MAGGIE
Maggie,
Yea I have been busy with numbers but not Lottos....I let QP do the job like Brado....saving money of course in the process...
perhaps this Friday might play big with LottoBuddy in S7...
Thanks for asking...
Combo
Maggie,
Yea I have been busy with numbers but not Lottos....I let QP do the job like Brado....saving money of course in the process...
perhaps this Friday might play big with LottoBuddy in S7...
Thanks for asking...
Combo
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Re: did anyone see those numbers???
This was well announced.....So I don't think a quick pick won it.....Standard sets with triples consecutives as DN numbers from the far end of the spectrums did that in many lottos before....In fact I'm sure that a long term pattern set did the job on that one...And it might be someone on your ignore list....mon said:I JUST SAW THE QUEBEC 49 NUMBERS.....
6 9 10 11 12 13 BONUS 26
WOW
AND SOMEONE WON IT!!
Low numbers
Every combination is possible:
- in Quebec 49, on Sept. 20, 2003: numbers 06 - 09 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - B26 for sums of 61 (6 numbers) and 87 (7 numbers)
===> very low numbers with 5 consecutives
But also in Canadian Lotto 6/49
- Draw #73 on Oct 29, 1983: numbers 01 - 05 - 07 - 08 - 11 - 13 - B03 for sums of 45 (6 numbers) and 48 (7 numbers)
===> lowest sum recorded yet (6 and 7 numbers)
- Draw #1446 on Nov. 29, 1997: numbers 03 - 04 - 05 - 09 - 14 - 18 - B11 for sums of 53 (6 numbers) and 64 (7 numbers)
Ok no 5 consecutives but this happened before in Canadian 6/49:
- Draw #1748 on Oct. 21, 2000 numbers 38 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - B17 for sums of 263 (6 numbers) and 280 (7 numbers)
===> very high numbers with 5 consecutives
Every combination is possible:
- in Quebec 49, on Sept. 20, 2003: numbers 06 - 09 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - B26 for sums of 61 (6 numbers) and 87 (7 numbers)
===> very low numbers with 5 consecutives
But also in Canadian Lotto 6/49
- Draw #73 on Oct 29, 1983: numbers 01 - 05 - 07 - 08 - 11 - 13 - B03 for sums of 45 (6 numbers) and 48 (7 numbers)
===> lowest sum recorded yet (6 and 7 numbers)
- Draw #1446 on Nov. 29, 1997: numbers 03 - 04 - 05 - 09 - 14 - 18 - B11 for sums of 53 (6 numbers) and 64 (7 numbers)
Ok no 5 consecutives but this happened before in Canadian 6/49:
- Draw #1748 on Oct. 21, 2000 numbers 38 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - B17 for sums of 263 (6 numbers) and 280 (7 numbers)
===> very high numbers with 5 consecutives
Brad
Member
Interesting Gilles,
don't have a quick way to confirm if BC ever had 5 consecutives, but the lowest nB and wB sum draws ever were:
#874 6/10/00 01-03-05-06-08-16 B40, sums 39(nB) 89(wB)
#229 4/06/94 03-04-06-11-12-22 B02, sums 58(nB) 60(wB)
so far the lowest draws (below nB sum 70) were: 39, 56, 58, 65(x2), 66, 67, 68, 69 ... so that's less than 1% of 1215 total draws.
Don't think I'll be playing 1-2-3-4-5-6 any time soon, but it is possible ...
just wonder when it hits how many ways the JP will split.
don't have a quick way to confirm if BC ever had 5 consecutives, but the lowest nB and wB sum draws ever were:
#874 6/10/00 01-03-05-06-08-16 B40, sums 39(nB) 89(wB)
#229 4/06/94 03-04-06-11-12-22 B02, sums 58(nB) 60(wB)
so far the lowest draws (below nB sum 70) were: 39, 56, 58, 65(x2), 66, 67, 68, 69 ... so that's less than 1% of 1215 total draws.
Don't think I'll be playing 1-2-3-4-5-6 any time soon, but it is possible ...
just wonder when it hits how many ways the JP will split
.B.C. data
Brad your data is right.
There has been no draw with 5 consecutives but three times with 4 consecutives:
- draw #219 with numbers: 07 - 08 - 09 - 10
- draw #243 with numbers: 35 - 36 - 37 - 38
- draw #313 with numbers: 35 - 36 - 37 - 38
Surprising that that the same 4 consecutive numbers (35 to 38) repeated twice fairly rapidly (draws #243 and 313) and also there has no 4 conscutives since draw #313.
In Lotto 6/69, 4 consecutives happened 6 times and once 5 consecutives
Brad your data is right.
There has been no draw with 5 consecutives but three times with 4 consecutives:
- draw #219 with numbers: 07 - 08 - 09 - 10
- draw #243 with numbers: 35 - 36 - 37 - 38
- draw #313 with numbers: 35 - 36 - 37 - 38
Surprising that that the same 4 consecutive numbers (35 to 38) repeated twice fairly rapidly (draws #243 and 313) and also there has no 4 conscutives since draw #313.
In Lotto 6/69, 4 consecutives happened 6 times and once 5 consecutives
Last edited:
Brad
Member
That 35 to 38 is strange, I would bet against it happening again ... and to have all three 4 cons. within 100 draws also goes back to anything being possible.
Looking at both BC and CN suggests 4 cons. about once every 300 draws, so it does look like BC is overdue. Something to think about when checking wheels, I may not be so quick to throw out the occasional line with 4 consecutives.
Cheers
Looking at both BC and CN suggests 4 cons. about once every 300 draws, so it does look like BC is overdue. Something to think about when checking wheels, I may not be so quick to throw out the occasional line with 4 consecutives.
Cheers