Playing Full selection ( 48#s)

[roger.www]

I found a wheel on the net that plays the full section (48numbers ) in
8 lines. Out of curiosity I played $48 worth and got
4 lines hitting 3/6 !

Needless to say, assuming these results can be duplicated
this seems to be a low risk way to play 649. I have played
$60 worth in the past and gotten nothing back.

Any opinions on the pros-and-cons of a full selection ?

 

[PAB]

Hi Roger,

I would be Interested in Seeing the 8 Line Wheel. Would it be Possible for you to Post it Please. We can then Run it Through Covermaster to see the Statistics for Each Group.

Thanks in Advance.
All the Best.
PAB

 

[roger.www]

Hi Roger,

I would be Interested in Seeing the 8 Line Wheel. Would it be Possible for you to Post it Please. We can then Run it Through Covermaster to see the Statistics for Each Group.

Thanks in Advance.
All the Best.
PAB

PAB d/l Lottery Cracker version 2 by
CCA Software ( RawComputing)
you will find the full selection wheel
in that s/w.

 

[PAB]

Thanks for the Reply Roger,

Would it be Possible for you to Actually Post the 8 Lines Here so Everyone can see them Please.

All the Best.
PAB

 

[roger.www]

Thanks for the Reply Roger,

Would it be Possible for you to Actually Post the 8 Lines Here so Everyone can see them Please.

All the Best.
PAB

The underlying wheel design is in the software PAB.
Please d/l the software and you will see what I mean.
Use the analysis based on UK National Lottery (6/49 numbers)
and then select "Full Selection".
The trial version is good for 30 days.
maybe you can interpret the underlying wheel design and post
the results...I am not at expert at that sort of thing.

 

[roger.www]

Ok..here is one set of numbers (48/49) only 12 is missing, let's see how well it perfoms tonight

1-6-13-14-16-49
7-8-18-20-23-41
4-5-10-27-31-32
21-22-25-28-29-37
9-17-38-40-45-46
33-34-35-36-43-47
3-11-15-30-39-42
2-19-24-26-44-48

 

[roger.www]

And here another set of 8 lines (48/49)
only 36 is missing.
_____________________
1-8-15-24-39-41
10-11-42-44-47-48
13-14-16-27-29-34
4-5-30-32-33-45
3-9-22-35-37-38
6-18-25-28-31-43
12-17-21-23-26-49
2-7-19-20-40-46

 

[veronica]

lotto 649

The Canadian 649 being $2.00 a ticket it gets expensive buying them. So of the combinations you posted, what are the best ones to play, without a person spending more money than they can afford?

regards

 

[roger.www]

So of the combinations you posted, what are the best ones to play, without a person spending more money than they can afford?

regards

How would I know that ? If cash is a problem you
can use the same set of numbers for Ont49.
The idea of the (48/49)combo set is that you are assured
one or more of your numbers will be included in the draw.

 

[roger.www]

2/6

And here another set of 8 lines (48/49)
only 36 is missing.
_____________________
1-8-15-24-39-41
10-11-42-44-47-48
13-14-16-27-29-34
4-5-30-32-33-45
3-9-22-35-37-38
6-18-25-28-31-43
12-17-21-23-26-49
2-7-19-20-40-46

Actual : 4-11-18-20-29-44

Did not pass this draw..
I did get ( one line) 3/6 with a third set that I did.

 

[blitzed]

Actual : 4-11-18-20-29-44

Did not pass this draw..
I did get ( one line) 3/6 with a third set that I did.

Better luck next time!

One suggestion I have is to re-arrange your picks so that the numbers from the last draw are split down through different picks...since most of the time no more than one number from the previous draw appears in the next draw.

Another thing you might want to try is my full spectrum picks:
http://crazynuts.hollosite.com/649_lottery_picks/

seeya,
blitzed

 

[roger.www]

Better luck next time!

One suggestion I have is to re-arrange your picks so that the numbers from the last draw are split down through different picks...since most of the time no more than one number from the previous draw appears in the next draw.

Another thing you might want to try is my full spectrum picks:
http://crazynuts.hollosite.com/649_lottery_picks/

seeya,
blitzed

Thanks Blitzed ! That's a great idea. Thanks for the link also.
After looking at your site I am debating whether to risk
$124.00 and wheel 18 numbers in 62 combinations.
If I get 4/6 I will get most of my money refunded.
In some of the full selection combinations I am generating all the six winning numbers
are scattered across the first 3 lines.

 

[blitzed]

Thanks Blitzed ! That's a great idea. Thanks for the link also.
After looking at your site I am debating whether to risk
$124.00 and wheel 18 numbers in 62 combinations.
If I get 4/6 I will get most of my money refunded.
In some of the full selection combinations I am generating all the six winning numbers
are scattered across the first 3 lines.

Hello roger.www, you are most welcome. In most cases I think wheels are more risk than they are worth...most especially at $2 a pop!

In your case I think of it like this - 18 numbers can be played in 3 picks...how often have you made up 3 picks before, only to find that you had absolutely NONE of the numbers from the draw? In such case, you'd be screwed with 62 picks wheeled from those 18 numbers whew!

Even when I run my own systems on pick3 for example, if I'm able to validate as many as 6 or 7 digits out of the 10 as havin the best probability...if I was to wheel them, all it takes is the hottest digit to be drawn out on the fringes of probability, and it is all ruined.

good luck with whatever you decide to try!
blitzed

 

[GillesD]

Playing full selections

I have a tendency to try out all theories (new and improved in all cases) against the real data. And this is what I tried with the two full selections posted here.

In both cases, I compared the 8 lines suggested against the results for all 2389 draws of Loto 6/49 and here what I got:

- for the full selection with number 12 missing: 357 times with 3 winning numbers and 18 times with 4 winning numbers and never any combination with 5 or more winning numbers

- for the full selection with number 36 missing: 353 times with 3 winning numbers and 13 times with 4 winning numbers and never any combination with 5 or more winning numbers

I also tried two other full selections of my own with number 49 missing in both cases. Here are my results:

- for a full selection where numbers increase by 8 in each combination (1-9-17-25-33-41, then 2-10-18-26-34-42, and so on), 357 times with 3 winning numbers and 19 times with 4 winning numbers and never any combination with 5 or more winning numbers

- for a full selection where numbers are sequential each combination (1-2-3-4-5-6, then 7-8-9-10-11-12, and so on), 344 times with 3 winning numbers and 19 times with 4 winning numbers and never any combination with 5 or more winning numbers

So you can draw your own conclusions, but it appears fairly obvious that, on the long run, any full selection with 48 numbers is as good any other one. But with the knowledge of past draws, you could make a full selection that out performs all othe ones (may be even with 5 or more jackpot winner).