Pick 3 Turbo Pl
Member
From a previous thread:
http://www.lotto649.ws/daily-lottos/7605-pick-3-system-program-forecasting.html
I thought I said PAE as a doubles within 4 draws, but apparently I said 7. Well, it hit yesterday (11/5) two draws later.
This is a tough play because it requires a bit of loot. You can (generally) safely cut the size down to 90 by stripping out triples, and often you can get rid of a root, which brings the combinations for play to 79, But the more filters you introduce the odds creep up on you that you'll miss the boat, even if you were right in the primary thesis (a doubles play within x number of draws).
Nonetheless, as indicated, the two likely candidates for near term play for a doubles, as noted 11/3 have both played.
The matrix for a doubles side play is a little ugly. Here is what 7 draws out looks like with the only filter being triples taken out:
http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q16/p3plyr/matrix2.jpg
To capitalize, then, on this sort of play, even though the probability is excellent in game-wide holistic comparitive terms, the rate of return is low, and if you have to go out 7 draws very low indeed. But, a win is a win. The point is if you are going to win, then the issue of how much is not as relevant.
However, anything can happen, and for the record you could go all the way out to draw 7 and still not see the doubles, which would result in a hefty loss. To control this risk you can always opt for .25 tickets. It is not the best play oin terms of risk reward, but it is worth ongoing study. It is at least encouraging to see that based on the study of the stats I have been hitting all my plays.
Can we ever get to a point where we 'know' what is going to happen in a tight range of draw dates, where the issue simply becomes one of having enough cash in our acct to back up our plays until they hit?
Well, this is an area I have devoted a lot of time to. I lean to a yes, but have the usual generic reservations. At least I have the tools and infrastructure to continue to develop the model.
http://www.lotto649.ws/daily-lottos/7605-pick-3-system-program-forecasting.html
I thought I said PAE as a doubles within 4 draws, but apparently I said 7. Well, it hit yesterday (11/5) two draws later.
This is a tough play because it requires a bit of loot. You can (generally) safely cut the size down to 90 by stripping out triples, and often you can get rid of a root, which brings the combinations for play to 79, But the more filters you introduce the odds creep up on you that you'll miss the boat, even if you were right in the primary thesis (a doubles play within x number of draws).
Nonetheless, as indicated, the two likely candidates for near term play for a doubles, as noted 11/3 have both played.
The matrix for a doubles side play is a little ugly. Here is what 7 draws out looks like with the only filter being triples taken out:
http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q16/p3plyr/matrix2.jpg
To capitalize, then, on this sort of play, even though the probability is excellent in game-wide holistic comparitive terms, the rate of return is low, and if you have to go out 7 draws very low indeed. But, a win is a win. The point is if you are going to win, then the issue of how much is not as relevant.
However, anything can happen, and for the record you could go all the way out to draw 7 and still not see the doubles, which would result in a hefty loss. To control this risk you can always opt for .25 tickets. It is not the best play oin terms of risk reward, but it is worth ongoing study. It is at least encouraging to see that based on the study of the stats I have been hitting all my plays.
Can we ever get to a point where we 'know' what is going to happen in a tight range of draw dates, where the issue simply becomes one of having enough cash in our acct to back up our plays until they hit?
Well, this is an area I have devoted a lot of time to. I lean to a yes, but have the usual generic reservations. At least I have the tools and infrastructure to continue to develop the model.