Oct 22-Discussion
- Thread starter Florie
- Start date
Thinking of the 6 as well. You're right too many cold numbers that my long list practically are almost cold numbers I think. Haven't made up my mind yet as to which ones. If only we could hit at least 4 numbers. Problem with wheels is that if unsure of the numbers, I see it as wasted $$$.mirage said:
There are the long shots of 12, 14 and 21. Always eliminated the repeats and look what happened last draw-2 repeats, 32 39.
Will eliminate the repeats again this time.
Last edited:
Florie said:Thinking of the 6 as well. You're right too many cold numbers that my long list practically are almost cold numbers I think. Haven't made up my mind yet as to which ones. If only we could hit at least 4 numbers. Problem with wheels is that if unsure of the numbers, I see it as wasted $$$.
There are the long shots of 12, 14 and 21. Always eliminated the repeats and look what happened last draw-2 repeats, 32 39.
Will eliminate the repeats again this time.
I don't wheel. I hand pick the numbers that I play from a list. This has it's down side, i.e. it's time consuming and you don't get the coverage. However, it's cheaper.
Mostly I use best bets like DN's then build on those.
I agree, should be over due for No repeat.
But you know how it goes. From what you say you must view cold numbers as those that have hit less than expectancy("underperformers"), rather than the simplistic how many draws ago last hit? I use both but overanalysing often not helpful.
If I look at my spread here, I am being drawn back again and again to either #34 or #36. Both in a trend of numbers in 30's decade and looks positioned just about right. Maybe it's too obvious, therefore, but anyway.
Also, there has not been a lot of 7 LD's drawn recently either. Not so sure about 6 - might hit, might not. Think the 7 looks more interesting so 7 & 36. The other one I like, which is also hot, is 23.
I think 10 is also way overdue. 12 and 14 are very underperforming. I think I'll avoid those.
So I think my basic set would be either DN 36, with 37, or DN 34 & 36, or DN 23, with 2, 6, 7, 10, 29, 38, ... and if I were going to choose from the 40's decade it would be 44, 45, or 47.
luckystrike
Member
I WILL BE KEEPING A CLOSE EYE ON THE #'S THAT ARE DRAWN FOR S-7 TO-NITE...FROM THERE I WILL DETERMINE MY FINAL PICKS FOR SATURDAY...
BUT LIKE I SAID....PLAY THE # 10....
BUT LIKE I SAID....PLAY THE # 10....
luckystrike
Member
YOU MAY ALSO WANT TO CONCIDER....8..31..40...
musclepower77
Member
I really don't like 7.
but 10 12 14 are looking really good
29 is like a trick it hasnt been picked for so long.. maybe it will never be!
23 looks really interesting I'm play this one alot this draw
but 10 12 14 are looking really good
29 is like a trick it hasnt been picked for so long.. maybe it will never be!
23 looks really interesting I'm play this one alot this draw
)
luckystrike said:I WILL BE KEEPING A CLOSE EYE ON THE #'S THAT ARE DRAWN FOR S-7 TO-NITE...FROM THERE I WILL DETERMINE MY FINAL PICKS FOR SATURDAY...
BUT LIKE I SAID....PLAY THE # 10....
Bases on S7 results, 10 is final then. Maybe 44 as well.
This draw could be cold numbers hitting or another "weird unexpected numbers " hitting. No matter let's not get carried away blowing a whole paycheck. Couple of draws like this still coming.
Last 3 Saturday draws in a row have not seen a number "cross over" from S7. Similar to any other draw having one from another draw the odds are something like 60% of time? Looks favourable for at least 1 number to be same as last night's S7. But first or last number of S7 not very often! Even if those might look.. you are taking bigger chances! (Or, just ignore - could be talking through my hat.) Anyway, imo, better off with an obscure number, even the bonus. Now I'm thinking the 15, 30, 25, or even repeat after all of 33 or 40.
After skipping last 3 Sats., it's possible there will be 2 the same as S7.
After skipping last 3 Sats., it's possible there will be 2 the same as S7.