Oct 2 Piks

Sheba

Member
Congrats to all the winners here last night!

If you call them.. They will come!:agree:

Sheba__:bouncy: :dog:~~~
Everybody's Got a Dream...JACKPOT!:love2:
 

Sheba

Member
Double click syndrome

If you call them.. They will come!:agree:

Sheba__:bouncy: :dog:~~~
Everybody's Got a Dream...JACKPOT!:love2:
 
Last edited:

Sheba

Member
Deleted....

If you call them.. They will come!:agree:

Sheba__:bouncy: :dog:~~~
Everybody's Got a Dream...JACKPOT!:love2:
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: My choices for Oct. 2nd

gsobier said:
...not too good today:bawl: here... ...could be something you are feeding:notme: him/her...

Yes George, definately an "off" night---He was a little grumpy while picking out numbers (was in one of his moods) When I offered him his nightly snack(a small piece of apple) he looked at me like: "haven't you got anything better?"He can't have nuts and seeds every time(not good for his liver) He reluctantly ate his apple and settled into his nesting box.....Maybe, he'll do better on the next draw. He's been pretty good lately...otherwise--it's back to the "winkeldinkel meter".....:wavey:
 

Sheba

Member
Karnac said:
Fat fingers or too many rum and cokes.....:lol:


Beats me what happened... No rum and no fat fingers....
:notme:

My system was really slow and I hit the submit button twice but when it displayed it was there only once and now that I returned Well there they are.... Wanted to get my count up.. :lol: not really...

Peaty will have something to say ....:D

Sheba..:dog:
 

peter

Member
Re: Re: Re: My choices for Oct. 2nd

winkeldinkel said:
Yes George, definately an "off" night---He was a little grumpy while picking out numbers (was in one of his moods) When I offered him his nightly snack(a small piece of apple) he looked at me like: "haven't you got anything better?"He can't have nuts and seeds every time(not good for his liver) He reluctantly ate his apple and settled into his nesting box.....Maybe, he'll do better on the next draw. He's been pretty good lately...otherwise--it's back to the "winkeldinkel meter".....:wavey:
Maybe the threat of turning him/her into a coat will smarten him/her up :lol:
 

Pradeep

Member
Congratulation Peter.

Peter,

You did a good Job.
Look at me.
My numbers were :
2 6 8 11 17 20 25 28 31 33 37 43 45 46

and nothing appear.
I am great looser.
........Peter , Please I am sad, Pls cheer me.
 

hot4

Member
Congratulations winners.

Peter 3in10!! Someday you'll try 12-14 numbers and guess what you'll hit ;)
 

gsobier

Member
Beaker:

Notice, he made a change in his set... ...It was an improvement:angel:. There is some interesting stuff I've been working on... ..it is hoped there will be more opportunities.

Regards,
George:)
Beaker said:
my thoughts exactly :dizzy:

Nice hit otherwise :agree2:
 

peter

Member
hot4 said:
Congratulations winners.

Peter 3in10!! Someday you'll try 12-14 numbers and guess what you'll hit ;)
Never say never, but I doubt it, 14 numbers is to much for me.
 

gsobier

Member
Peter:

Don't worry buddy, we can do something about that:agree:. Did the 3 hitters make it worth while to play?

Regards,
George:)
peter said:
Never say never, but I doubt it, 14 numbers is to much for me.
 

Beaker

Member
gsobier said:
Beaker:

Notice, he made a change in his set... ...It was an improvement:angel:. There is some interesting stuff I've been working on... ..it is hoped there will be more opportunities.

Regards,
George:)
I didn't notice that George :no: but that's what it's all about - moving to a better position based on our disussions.

I know Peter rarely plays repeaters :agree: - fortunately I do. Unfortunately for me, the only 2 numbers I had were 14-27 :dizzy:
 

peter

Member
Beaker said:
I didn't notice that George :no: but that's what it's all about - moving to a better position based on our disussions.

I know Peter rarely plays repeaters :agree: - fortunately I do. Unfortunately for me, the only 2 numbers I had were 14-27 :dizzy:
Not playing repeaters is my downfall, unfortunately I'm not as good at repeaters as Beaker is.
And we all know repeaters are a fact 50% of the time.
Perhaps we need to focus our attention on them, and go from there, not picking repeaters for me is due to selecting such a small set.
 

gsobier

Member
Beaker:

Adding those 2 to Peter's was obviously 5 in a set of 12. Doing that again is tricky.

Regards,
George:)
Beaker said:
I didn't notice that George :no: but that's what it's all about - moving to a better position based on our disussions.

I know Peter rarely plays repeaters :agree: - fortunately I do. Unfortunately for me, the only 2 numbers I had were 14-27 :dizzy:
 

Sidebar

Top