JaredCenter
Member
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Answers To Your Questions
Maybe Powerball read what I put in 649 discussions for August 7.
hot4 said:
Maybe Powerball read what I put in 649 discussions for August 7.
Newbie Needs Assistance (with Super7/Lotto649)
- Thread starter Jack Pawt
- Start date
johnph77
Member
Excerpt from Beaker's post:
***************
Because they have just as much chance as any other number??
Let's make it simple. Say you have 2 die ie dice. Do you bet a sum of 2 ie snake eyes 1-1 or do you bet a sum of 7. ie 1-6,2-5,3-4,4-3,5-2,6-1?
Play to win
***************
Probably for the first time I have to take exception to a post by Beaker. Comparing throwing dice to lottery games is like comparing apples to oranges, EXCEPT in Pick 3, 4, 5 and 6 games where duplicate numbers can occur. Throwing two dice has 36 possibilities, and a 2/6 lottery would have but 15 - 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 1-6, 2-3, 2-4, 2-5, 2-6, 3-4, 3-5, 3-6, 4-5, 4-6 and 5-6. The sum of 7 argument retains its validity, although there are but 3 possibilities, not 6.
If duplicate numbers were permitted in a 6/49 game there would have to be six sets of 49 balls - or six separate drawings of one ball from a full set of 49. There would be 13,841,287,201 possibilities (NOT allowing for sorted duplicates), not 13,983,816. The lowest possible sum would be 6 (1-1-1-1-1-1), not 21 (1-2-3-4-5-6). The highest possible sum would be 294 (49-49-49-49-49-49), not 279 (44-45-46-47-48-49).
Given this, I'd have to go along with Brad's statement. Any set of six specific numbers has the same chance of being drawn as any other set, no matter how much analysis is done or how eerie it may seem to appear.
gl
john
***************
Because they have just as much chance as any other number??
Let's make it simple. Say you have 2 die ie dice. Do you bet a sum of 2 ie snake eyes 1-1 or do you bet a sum of 7. ie 1-6,2-5,3-4,4-3,5-2,6-1?
Play to win
***************
Probably for the first time I have to take exception to a post by Beaker. Comparing throwing dice to lottery games is like comparing apples to oranges, EXCEPT in Pick 3, 4, 5 and 6 games where duplicate numbers can occur. Throwing two dice has 36 possibilities, and a 2/6 lottery would have but 15 - 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 1-6, 2-3, 2-4, 2-5, 2-6, 3-4, 3-5, 3-6, 4-5, 4-6 and 5-6. The sum of 7 argument retains its validity, although there are but 3 possibilities, not 6.
If duplicate numbers were permitted in a 6/49 game there would have to be six sets of 49 balls - or six separate drawings of one ball from a full set of 49. There would be 13,841,287,201 possibilities (NOT allowing for sorted duplicates), not 13,983,816. The lowest possible sum would be 6 (1-1-1-1-1-1), not 21 (1-2-3-4-5-6). The highest possible sum would be 294 (49-49-49-49-49-49), not 279 (44-45-46-47-48-49).
Given this, I'd have to go along with Brad's statement. Any set of six specific numbers has the same chance of being drawn as any other set, no matter how much analysis is done or how eerie it may seem to appear.
gl
john
Re: Re: Answers To Your Questions
Beaker:
These ideas Power
has are 
.
...odds?... ...oh, give me a break...
We have to look at it this way... ......out of all the sets played, what is the percentage of sets played by well informed players, hum???
For arguments sake, lets say anyone selecting numbers without taking into consideration recent draw history or things like announcers is declared a Quick Pick. Power pointed out 31 is the most frequent (big deal) and there is much more to it... ...I wonder if Power really knows who to select realistic numbers
.
So, how many are Quick Picks??? About 95% are probably Quick Picks. Claims of Quick Picks doing better is only because of the population of Quick Picks is almost 100%!
Regards,
George
Beaker:
These ideas Power
has are ....odds?... ...oh, give me a break...
We have to look at it this way... ......out of all the sets played, what is the percentage of sets played by well informed players, hum???
For arguments sake, lets say anyone selecting numbers without taking into consideration recent draw history or things like announcers is declared a Quick Pick. Power
pointed out 31 is the most frequent (big deal) and there is much more to it... ...I wonder if Power really knows who to select realistic numbers.So, how many are Quick Picks??? About 95% are probably Quick Picks. Claims of Quick Picks doing better is only because of the population of Quick Picks is almost 100%!
Regards,
George
Beaker said:
Re: Re: Re: Re: Answers To Your Questions
...same odds, yes, so what... ...you failed to realize players who know what they are doing have better potential... ...there are only a few, very few... ...you should post your sets to demonstrate your expertise or your Quick Picks
!
...same odds, yes, so what... ...you failed to realize players who know what they are doing have better potential... ...there are only a few, very few... ...you should post your sets to demonstrate your expertise or your Quick Picks
!powerball said:
Brad
Member
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Answers To Your Questions
What's the cow doing? Blowing bubbles or spitting out Announcer numbers? Can't tell without magnifying ...
Is that your mug shot George? Nice site !!gsobier said:
What's the cow doing? Blowing bubbles or spitting out Announcer numbers? Can't tell without magnifying ...
...Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Answers To Your Questions
Hey George, good stuff, those so many reports you have told us sometime ago...
pitty I don't understand "announcers" yet
PS: What is Tom Hanks doing in your site?
gsobier said:Frank:
If you trap those numbers just right, it could be you... ...go for it Frank
...oh ya, here is where you can get announcers for the next draw (2144) here...
Regards,
George
Hey George, good stuff, those so many reports you have told us sometime ago...
pitty I don't understand "announcers" yet
PS: What is Tom Hanks doing in your site?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Answers To Your Questions
...I'm his long lost brother... ...did you try clicking on the picture?...
...I'm his long lost brother
... ...did you try clicking on the picture?...hot4 said:Hey George, good stuff, those so many reports you have told us sometime ago...
pitty I don't understand "announcers" yet
PS: What is Tom Hanks doing in your site?
Maggie
Member
The worst of it is, we used up all our extra funds for last nights draw, now we only have our usual amt. for Saturday. A few of us wanted to spend only half, but, majority ruled and they wanted to blow the whole enchilada. 
Needless to say, this morning they were regretting that move.
Needless to say, this morning they were regretting that move.