My elimination method

[taaroa]

Hi,

The elimination method I use is based on Robert Perkis article at
http://www.lotto-logix.com/txthouse/winthelottery.html

I first eliminate cold numbers (frequency = 0 on 17 last drawings).
I also analyse the last 16 drawings like Perkis for the 6/53 lottery.
I however don't use his exact method. I don't eliminate the numbers quoted "X"
because some of them often appear, but I eliminate numbers with three "***" or more.

As my lotto is a 649, I made another analyse but modify Perkis system and made groups of drawings
of A=2,B=2,C=3,D=2,E=2. 11 numbers against Perkis 17 numbers. Perkis use 3-3-4-3-3 for
his 653 lotto. This last method is a Perkis method variant in reality.

I eliminate numbers with two "**" and more.

So I eliminate about 6 cold numbers and 4 to 6 (adding 17 # Perkis method and my 11# adapted method).

Just eliminated 1 good number in last drawing. O elimination the drawing before.


taaroa

 

[CMF]

A 3 Win ...

taaroa

Playing QuickPicks -

... for 55 plays per draw in a 6/49 Lotto you will average a 3 win per draw.

... for 26 plays per draw in a 6/49 Lotto you will average a 3 win every 2nd draw.

Does your system match or exceed that?

Some of the things Bob Perkis wrote in the 80's do not necessarily accord with his current thinking.

Guarantees per draw for 49 numbers are not worth the extra expense as an equivalent average can be obtained for a far lesser amount.

Colin

 

[taaroa]

CMF,

My goal is just to have less numbers to play to have better odds.
I eliminated 11 numbers with this system. So instead of playing 49 numbers, I played 38 numbers.

Odds for 6/49 : 3 in 6 = 1/56.7 ; 6 in 6 = 1/ 13 983 186
Odds for 6/38 : 3 in 6 = 1/27.8 ; 6 in 6 = 1/2 760 681

This was just I wanted. Getting better odds before playing.

Playing numbers out of these 38 numbers is another question. I don't have the answer. I tried to find others filters. In fact, I also choose not to play the unit decade 1-9. One number was however good.

So, I eliminated total 17 numbers. 2 were good, each in one drawing. I did not however played this game as I had another system test playing (pairs).

To get my combs, I always use Ion Saliu's Pick632 or MDIE. Results are fairly good when you have good filters. Not easy.
taaroa

 

[CMF]

I disagree ...

tooroa

Just about everything you wrote I disagree with - you will have to look elsewhere for the reasons.

If what you do keeps the braincells activated and you're not wasting too much money then enjoy the ride!

Colin

 

[paul762]

I tend not to try and eliminate numbers, my preference in my 649 game is to just play an extra number for 7 lines I increase my chances by 700% and if I get 6 from 7 I am guaranteed the jackpot.
everyone is different I suppose.

 

[taaroa]

Paul,

Sure that there are as many ways to get the numbers to play as there are players. They give various results. I also use as other strategy the sum of the 6 numbers as a trigger for the next 2 draws. When it is lower than 90, I eliminate numbers 39 to 49 in the next 2 draws (my lotto 649 have 2 drawings each wednesday and saturday. If it doesn't appear, I eliminate these numbers again for the next two drawings. When decade 40 do not appear, I eliminate the 10 decade next two draws. This is an adaptation of strategy I saw on Ion Saliu's site. The bonus number is also to follow. It can appear in the 6 numbers next 2 to 4 draws. There are however cycles as for others patterns.

Just type saliu and socrates to get into saliu's site.

taaroa

 

[tomtom]

I tend not to try and eliminate numbers, my preference in my 649 game is to just play an extra number for 7 lines I increase my chances by 700% and if I get 6 from 7 I am guaranteed the jackpot.
everyone is different I suppose.

????

Can you explain the 700% increase please?

 

[paul762]

adding one extra number cuts the odds in a 6/49 game from almost 14,000,000 / 1 to almost 2,000,000 / 1

 

[tomtom]

adding one extra number cuts the odds in a 6/49 game from almost 14,000,000 / 1 to almost 2,000,000 / 1

Yeah, you are absolutely right …but also at about the same percent increases the tickets costs, without any guaranties.