May 24 Discussion.
- Thread starter Pradeep
- Start date
~~~ ®™ Hello guys, yes, i'm back.. and no Numbersdude and Snides are not the same person.. I will always only be Snides.. I bet you were thinking that because i picked the same avatar on a different piece of the internet.. The choices there were limited at the time, and that one seemed to suit me.. I almost picked it here but then I remembered that it was NumbersDude's avatar..
It took me awhile to get back in here, somehow my password got messed up and my old email address was on file so i couldn't get my password emailed to me. It took two attempts contacting the webmaster here over almost a month to get my password reset.
Also, with the numbers I posted, heh, I posted the wrong group, and I believe I shall have to go edit that post or I will probably only get 1 or 2 numbers out of it..
Anywho, thanks for the welcome back y'all
It took me awhile to get back in here, somehow my password got messed up and my old email address was on file so i couldn't get my password emailed to me. It took two attempts contacting the webmaster here over almost a month to get my password reset.
Also, with the numbers I posted, heh, I posted the wrong group, and I believe I shall have to go edit that post or I will probably only get 1 or 2 numbers out of it..
Anywho, thanks for the welcome back y'all
Nick Koutras
Member
Hello all,
For this draw I have the impression that the following
may occur:
The Average of the 7 numbers will be between 24 to 31
and the Standard Deviation will be between 13.5 and 17.
If the above occur the following have happen in 402 such Drawings.
Frequency Size Numbers
85 1 45
83 1 47
75 1 31
69 3 374446
68 1 40
67 1 34
66 2 3642
65 2 4143
64 1 39
63 1 09
62 1 49
61 1 48
60 2 0538
59 3 102030
58 1 26
57 2 2127
56 4 04131928
55 1 15
54 3 172529
53 2 1214
52 3 161835
51 1 33
50 1 08
49 2 2332
47 2 0722
45 1 06
43 1 11
42 1 01
41 2 0224
40 1 03
Based on the above the best numbers
shall be 45 & 47
From the small numbers the 5 & 9 are more frequent.
These figures are easily extracted from the Lotto Selector
Any comments are welcome.
Nick
For this draw I have the impression that the following
may occur:
The Average of the 7 numbers will be between 24 to 31
and the Standard Deviation will be between 13.5 and 17.
If the above occur the following have happen in 402 such Drawings.
Frequency Size Numbers
85 1 45
83 1 47
75 1 31
69 3 374446
68 1 40
67 1 34
66 2 3642
65 2 4143
64 1 39
63 1 09
62 1 49
61 1 48
60 2 0538
59 3 102030
58 1 26
57 2 2127
56 4 04131928
55 1 15
54 3 172529
53 2 1214
52 3 161835
51 1 33
50 1 08
49 2 2332
47 2 0722
45 1 06
43 1 11
42 1 01
41 2 0224
40 1 03
Based on the above the best numbers
shall be 45 & 47
From the small numbers the 5 & 9 are more frequent.
These figures are easily extracted from the Lotto Selector
Any comments are welcome.
Nick
Nick Koutras
Member
Another report
When the Average is between 17 and 23
and the Standard Deviation between 12 and 15
the following have happen in 229 Drawings.
Frequency Numbers
51 1 02
50 1 03
48 2 0813
47 1 07
46 1 04
45 2 1220
44 2 0516
42 3 010627
41 1 30
40 4 09101824
39 2 1123
38 2 1519
37 3 141721
33 2 2631
32 1 22
31 1 39
30 2 3234
27 2 2941
26 2 2536
25 2 3537
24 3 283343
23 2 3840
19 1 42
18 1 44
12 1 45
11 2 4647
5 1 48
4 1 49
When the Average is between 17 and 23
and the Standard Deviation between 12 and 15
the following have happen in 229 Drawings.
Frequency Numbers
51 1 02
50 1 03
48 2 0813
47 1 07
46 1 04
45 2 1220
44 2 0516
42 3 010627
41 1 30
40 4 09101824
39 2 1123
38 2 1519
37 3 141721
33 2 2631
32 1 22
31 1 39
30 2 3234
27 2 2941
26 2 2536
25 2 3537
24 3 283343
23 2 3840
19 1 42
18 1 44
12 1 45
11 2 4647
5 1 48
4 1 49
Sportser:
I'm still a bit lost in following of what you played. Are you avoiding 7 numbers (not in play) and using 42 to make create sets? Please explain what you mean in regard to " 2- 42 no.s wheel".
Those 13 favorite you mentioned... ...are they sets which you always play? Have you won often with them?
Have you seen my report at the beginning of this thread which I post before each draw? My report tells me roughly where numbers come from. This draw today had a typical 4 from the first 30 and 2 from the remaining 19 (I call it "4 and 2").
Regards,
George
I'm still a bit lost in following of what you played. Are you avoiding 7 numbers (not in play) and using 42 to make create sets? Please explain what you mean in regard to " 2- 42 no.s wheel".
Those 13 favorite you mentioned... ...are they sets which you always play? Have you won often with them?
Have you seen my report at the beginning of this thread which I post before each draw? My report tells me roughly where numbers come from. This draw today had a typical 4 from the first 30 and 2 from the remaining 19 (I call it "4 and 2").
Regards,
George
Nick Koutras
Member
Hi George,
The 30 numbers below do have very good properties for the entire
games of Can 6/49
1,3,5,7,8,12,16,18,19,20,21,23,25,27,30,31,32,34,36,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,49
Win
1=11 Times
2=87 "
3=324 "
4=593 "
5=634 "
6=306 "
7=62 "
Nick
The 30 numbers below do have very good properties for the entire
games of Can 6/49
1,3,5,7,8,12,16,18,19,20,21,23,25,27,30,31,32,34,36,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,49
Win
1=11 Times
2=87 "
3=324 "
4=593 "
5=634 "
6=306 "
7=62 "
Nick
Charles2:
Thank you very much. I played 25 sets of 6 numbers. I selected 4 number from the 30 and 2 from the 19 based on my report. I then look at the composition of a winning set. The most frequent arrangements which a set should be composed with have 2 HOT, and 1 COLD a majority of the time. This is NOT a hard and fast rule, just the most common one. Sometimes there are no HOT in a set which also is somewhat likely but NOT the most dominate. For this reason, I also have 2 other categories labeled Warm and Cool. Its alot of figuring out (damn good thing I can write programs).
There is one step in my procedure which I've stumbled across and it really helps to decied which numbers should NOT be used together in a set of 6. That alone, cuts down the odds against you big time. Its really amazing how often this isolation process I've developed does work consistantly. All those wrong choices I don't have to worry about is a big plus.
For now, this is the first time I've used this refined method and I like what I have seen so far.
There are many other criterias which I run the sets through to weed out ones which have a more likely chance of not doing well. Delta pairs is one of the other things which I use to decide if a set has a chance and should be used. I'm finding more and more, with criteria, if applied well does more good than harm.
Regards,
George
Thank you
very much. I played 25 sets of 6 numbers. I selected 4 number from the 30 and 2 from the 19 based on my report. I then look at the composition of a winning set. The most frequent arrangements which a set should be composed with have 2 HOT, and 1 COLD a majority of the time. This is NOT a hard and fast rule, just the most common one. Sometimes there are no HOT in a set which also is somewhat likely but NOT the most dominate. For this reason, I also have 2 other categories labeled Warm and Cool. Its alot of figuring out (damn good thing I can write programs).There is one step in my procedure which I've stumbled across and it really helps to decied which numbers should NOT be used together in a set of 6. That alone, cuts down the odds against you big time. Its really amazing how often this isolation process I've developed does work consistantly. All those wrong choices I don't have to worry about is a big plus.
For now, this is the first time I've used this refined method and I like what I have seen so far.
There are many other criterias which I run the sets through to weed out ones which have a more likely chance of not doing well. Delta pairs is one of the other things which I use to decide if a set has a chance and should be used. I'm finding more and more, with criteria, if applied well does more good than harm.
Regards,
George
charles2 said:nice picking gsobier
you said you played 25 sets, of what? all the same number wheels like 7 or 8? etc etc
it seems to work well for you
Last edited:
Nick:
I am sure you are correct Nick. There are trends/changes which I expect will cause that list contain a difference to some degree. If you run the report for the first 1000 draws and then the last 100 draws (2 extremes) what difference is there looking at all 3 lists? I'm curiuos to see how much things do change. This is possibly related to the development toward Dennis' dancing set which he has developed (probably other factors too).
Am I correct Dennis?
Regards,
George
I am sure you are correct Nick. There are trends/changes which I expect will cause that list contain a difference to some degree. If you run the report for the first 1000 draws and then the last 100 draws (2 extremes) what difference is there looking at all 3 lists? I'm curiuos to see how much things do change. This is possibly related to the development toward Dennis' dancing set which he has developed (probably other factors too).
Am I correct Dennis?
Regards,
George
Nick Koutras said: