Master Lottery Software

[GillesD]

Theory or better called a guess?

...
GillesD are you still with us and what do you think of 3 digital ending theory?

Basically, you are saying what I have been saying here from quite some time: Every combination has a chance to come out in the next draws whether it has already come out or it has a very apparent pattern like 1-2-3-4-5-6 or 38-40-42-44-46-48 or 1-11-21-31-41-xx.

About your theory of digital ending, you used as example a value of 1 (with 1-11-21-31-41 values), here are my comments.

- In August 2007, you could have said: "If you extract the digital endings 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0 as well and start grouping them then you can make 10 lines predictions and keep them rolling for number of draws then you will hit 4,5 numbers correct and who knows may be you get jackpot". Quite interesting but I sure hope you did not follow this line of reasoning very long because as of now (some 165 draws later), no other combination with 3 digital ending of 1 have shown up.

- And why limit yourself with a digital ending of 1, apply the same scenario with digital endings of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9; at least, in some cases, (like with a 2), you had some combinations with 4 times the same digital endings.

- And why not a digital ending of 0? There less numbers, only 10, 20, 30 and 40, so it should make it easier or is it harder?

- And why limit yourself with digital endings, look into a mirror and apply your theory using decades instead, like combinations with 3 numbers in the first decade (numbers 1 to 9), or 3 numbers in the second decade, or in any decade.

- And why limit yourself to such easy patterns (digital ending or decade); maybe you could apply your theory to combinations like 1 number in each decade, or 2 numbers each in 3 decades, or …, or …, or …

So that makes quite a few theories to follow at the same time.

It is sure that patterns will repeat themselves. You are dealing with 6 numbers (or 7 if you consider the bonus number) out of 49. Even if you consider single number (from 1 to 49), it may take quite some time for one to come out.

I do not have data on the UK 49 lottery (although I could get it), but in the Canadian Lotto 6/49, one number went 79 draws without coming out, and 20 of the 49 numbers have at least one run of 50 draws without coming out. So even predicting one number in the next draw is not that easy.

And finally, I think that your comment about " every time I (Moses) find a new solution to lottery they (Camelot) keep on adding the new one" is a good joke. Either Camelot is rather dumb (I would cancel a lottery with a known solution for winning the jackpot) or they consider themselves a philanthropic organization, with a mission to provide millions in prizes to British citizens. Adding new lotteries (at least in Canada) has one and only one purpose: BRING MORE REVENUES TO GOVERNMENT.

I know only one occasion where a lottery was modified since a solution had been found, and it is here in Quebec. In a keno game (80 numbers generated through a computer program), a guy found that certain sequences of numbers repeated themselves within a shorter timeframe that could be expected. Loto Quebec did not waste time and went back to a method using balls to generate numbers.

Sorry I could not find more positive comments, but you asked for it.

 

[Moses]

Basically, you are saying what I have been saying here from quite some time: Every combination has a chance to come out in the next draws whether it has already come out or it has a very apparent pattern like 1-2-3-4-5-6 or 38-40-42-44-46-48 or 1-11-21-31-41-xx.

About your theory of digital ending, you used as example a value of 1 (with 1-11-21-31-41 values), here are my comments.

- In August 2007, you could have said: "If you extract the digital endings 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0 as well and start grouping them then you can make 10 lines predictions and keep them rolling for number of draws then you will hit 4,5 numbers correct and who knows may be you get jackpot". Quite interesting but I sure hope you did not follow this line of reasoning very long because as of now (some 165 draws later), no other combination with 3 digital ending of 1 have shown up.

- And why limit yourself with a digital ending of 1, apply the same scenario with digital endings of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9; at least, in some cases, (like with a 2), you had some combinations with 4 times the same digital endings.

- And why not a digital ending of 0? There less numbers, only 10, 20, 30 and 40, so it should make it easier or is it harder?

- And why limit yourself with digital endings, look into a mirror and apply your theory using decades instead, like combinations with 3 numbers in the first decade (numbers 1 to 9), or 3 numbers in the second decade, or in any decade.

- And why limit yourself to such easy patterns (digital ending or decade); maybe you could apply your theory to combinations like 1 number in each decade, or 2 numbers each in 3 decades, or …, or …, or …

So that makes quite a few theories to follow at the same time.

It is sure that patterns will repeat themselves. You are dealing with 6 numbers (or 7 if you consider the bonus number) out of 49. Even if you consider single number (from 1 to 49), it may take quite some time for one to come out.

I do not have data on the UK 49 lottery (although I could get it), but in the Canadian Lotto 6/49, one number went 79 draws without coming out, and 20 of the 49 numbers have at least one run of 50 draws without coming out. So even predicting one number in the next draw is not that easy.

And finally, I think that your comment about " every time I (Moses) find a new solution to lottery they (Camelot) keep on adding the new one" is a good joke. Either Camelot is rather dumb (I would cancel a lottery with a known solution for winning the jackpot) or they consider themselves a philanthropic organization, with a mission to provide millions in prizes to British citizens. Adding new lotteries (at least in Canada) has one and only one purpose: BRING MORE REVENUES TO GOVERNMENT.

I know only one occasion where a lottery was modified since a solution had been found, and it is here in Quebec. In a keno game (80 numbers generated through a computer program), a guy found that certain sequences of numbers repeated themselves within a shorter timeframe that could be expected. Loto Quebec did not waste time and went back to a method using balls to generate numbers.

Sorry I could not find more positive comments, but you asked for it.

Hello Gilles

Don't worry I am used to your negative views however that I don't understand what you're on about!
I don't know if your talking about Canadian lotto or UK, you said you do not have UK results but in your previous posts you said you keep UK data!
If you're talking about UK data that three same ending digit are repeating often enough!
If any syndicate play £100 and select a triple single digit combined with the other 9 digits will stand far better chance than choosing random numbers! Example;
1 1 1 0 0
1 1 1 2 2
1 1 1 3 3
1 1 1 4 4
1 1 1 5 5
1 1 1 6 6
1 1 1 7 7
1 1 1 8 8
1 1 1 9 9

-And do you call Camelot idiots? Perhaps you can explain why they invited me to London, since you have explanations for every thing, may be they were missing me and fancied to have a cup of tea with me and talk about weather!

-And please don’t be shy if you have better idea then let’s have it!

Moses

I don't understand your referal about August 2007

 

[Moses]

Unlikely Coincident?

25/03/2009, 8 9 8 2 2 2 8
Above is the Dream number result for last Wed draw (single digits) and the rest of the draws for the same date

25/03/2009,13,23,26,27,37,49,47 -- Lotto
25/03/2009,07,13,14,23,24,04 ----- Thunder
25/03/2009,02,16,19,20,23,24,26 -- Daily

I searched and found this Extra draw result (drawn order) which the last digits almost matched to dream number in exact position! There are two digit ending 7s (37,17)do not match to dream number draw but there are three numbers with digit 7s in lotto, 37 included!

03/09/2003, 38,37,17,32,02,22,08 Extra

Moses

 

[GillesD]

Negative views maybe but true? Most likely!

...
Don't worry I am used to your negative views however that I don't understand what you're on about! ...

Let's look at your comments.

Point #1: Available data for the UK lottery
- When I said "'I do not have data on the UK 49 lottery ", it was in the paragraph where I was referring to the maximum run without coming out for a single number. Sorry I was not more explicit for you. So,YES, I have the data for winning combinations for the UK lottery but NO, not for this statistic specifically although YES I could get it fairly easily. Why would I keep so much information on your lottery, I am Canadian and more specifically a Quebecer? So, for the Canadian Lotto 6/49, I maintain about 20 files with various characteristics, from digital ending, decades, sums, deltas and a few others. And this is why I provide a lot of information on this lottery on this site.

Point #2: Digital endings with 3 identical values
- Is this happening that often? Let's look at the data after 1,383 draws (UK lottery) but let's forget about the bonus number, this number has no value unless you get 5 other numbers:
--- Ending of 0: 1 time in November 2001
--- Ending of 1: 2 times with the last one in May 2000
--- Ending of 2: 7 times with the last one in July 2008
--- Ending of 3: 10 times with the last one in November 2008
--- Ending of 4: 8 times with the last one in May 2008
--- Ending of 5: 7 times with the last one in January 2009
--- Ending of 6: 2 times with the last one in April 2003
--- Ending of 7: 5 times with the last one in July 2006
--- Ending of 8: 5 times with the last one in January2007
--- Ending of 9: 10 times with the last one in January 2009
- So let's look at the performance of the syndicate for 2009 (24 draws). Since it is not known what ending would come out, they would have bet on every gigital ending (10 of them) an amount of 100 pounds (I assume) for each draw. So that makes 24 x 10 x 100 or 24,000 pounds. I sure hope they got a little more than a few 4 winners. But with a guy like you in the syndicate, I am sure they would have chosen the endings of 5 and 9, and stopped playing at the end of January.

Point #3: Camelot an idiot?
- Well first, how do I know that they invited you? This is your saying. And if I refer to your past posts, you made a few untrue statements. Is this false information? Anyway who cares? By the way, you haven't answered whether it is a 14 or 24 in the line with numbers 47 08 33 41 14/24 23 28 listed a few posts back. Talk about me not answering questions.
- And if you did give them the solution to the winning combination, then I do maintain my position. YES they are idiot and dumb to keep running this lottery. But really, why not? They get about 45% of the bets, if it is like here?

Point #4: Referral to 2007
- Well, in your post #595, where you posted some winning combinations that eventually led to the digital ending theory, the last combinations listed is dated August 2007. So by applying your theory at that time and waiting for a winning combination with 3 digital endings of 1, the wait could not have been very productive. With only 8 combinations with 2 digital endings of 1 (in 155 drawings), your other numbers would have to be much better for any positive returns.

 

[GameBelgium]

Hi Bloboul

Here's the 6/49 grid you asked for:

01 ------------10----------01
---------08-----------39
02-------------20----------02
---------17-----------30
03-------------30----------03
---------26-----------21
04-------------40----------04
---------35-----------12

 

[Moses]

Let's look at your comments.

Point #1: Available data for the UK lottery
- When I said "'I do not have data on the UK 49 lottery ", it was in the paragraph where I was referring to the maximum run without coming out for a single number. Sorry I was not more explicit for you. So,YES, I have the data for winning combinations for the UK lottery but NO, not for this statistic specifically although YES I could get it fairly easily. Why would I keep so much information on your lottery, I am Canadian and more specifically a Quebecer? So, for the Canadian Lotto 6/49, I maintain about 20 files with various characteristics, from digital ending, decades, sums, deltas and a few others. And this is why I provide a lot of information on this lottery on this site.

Point #2: Digital endings with 3 identical values
- Is this happening that often? Let's look at the data after 1,383 draws (UK lottery) but let's forget about the bonus number, this number has no value unless you get 5 other numbers:
--- Ending of 0: 1 time in November 2001
--- Ending of 1: 2 times with the last one in May 2000
--- Ending of 2: 7 times with the last one in July 2008
--- Ending of 3: 10 times with the last one in November 2008
--- Ending of 4: 8 times with the last one in May 2008
--- Ending of 5: 7 times with the last one in January 2009
--- Ending of 6: 2 times with the last one in April 2003
--- Ending of 7: 5 times with the last one in July 2006
--- Ending of 8: 5 times with the last one in January2007
--- Ending of 9: 10 times with the last one in January 2009
- So let's look at the performance of the syndicate for 2009 (24 draws). Since it is not known what ending would come out, they would have bet on every gigital ending (10 of them) an amount of 100 pounds (I assume) for each draw. So that makes 24 x 10 x 100 or 24,000 pounds. I sure hope they got a little more than a few 4 winners. But with a guy like you in the syndicate, I am sure they would have chosen the endings of 5 and 9, and stopped playing at the end of January.

Point #3: Camelot an idiot?
- Well first, how do I know that they invited you? This is your saying. And if I refer to your past posts, you made a few untrue statements. Is this false information? Anyway who cares? By the way, you haven't answered whether it is a 14 or 24 in the line with numbers 47 08 33 41 14/24 23 28 listed a few posts back. Talk about me not answering questions.
- And if you did give them the solution to the winning combination, then I do maintain my position. YES they are idiot and dumb to keep running this lottery. But really, why not? They get about 45% of the bets, if it is like here?

Point #4: Referral to 2007
- Well, in your post #595, where you posted some winning combinations that eventually led to the digital ending theory, the last combinations listed is dated August 2007. So by applying your theory at that time and waiting for a winning combination with 3 digital endings of 1, the wait could not have been very productive. With only 8 combinations with 2 digital endings of 1 (in 155 drawings), your other numbers would have to be much better for any positive returns.

GillesD

You had the same arguments by repeating yourself over and over again with Tom, Jasper, Tony, Jug Monthly, Douglas, and several others in forums!
You are a type of person if you pass a shop and if you see an item behind window however that you have no intention to buy but still go inside and make a complaint!
I think you're forgetting the concept of this forum! This forum is not about UK or Canada only, there are other countries who have lotteries and will play large sums of money!
If anybody in this forum knew for sure that they will get 100 times more than they spend then they will spend that money, if I had it I would have spend it too however that you have over exaggerate the calculations!

British Colombia 28/03/2009 (last Sat)
02 03 13 19 23 36 39 (3x 3)

Canada super 7 28/03/2009 (just under your nose Gilles)
08 10 14 18 28 30 36 (3 x 8)

Greece 28/03/2009
07 17 20 27 33 35 31 (3 x 7)

Ireland (28/03/2009
01 09 20 21 38 41 14 (3 x 1)

Ohio
02 21 22 42 46 47 (3 x 2)

So, hopefully this will shut you up for good but knowing you you still come back and argue!
If you have doubt about my invetation by Camelot just phone them and ask
+44 (0)20 7016 3400, July 23 2003, at 13:00 hours
101 Wigmore St
London
W1U 1QU

You cannot and will not stop me Gilles

Moses

 

[Flexalong]

GillesD

You had the same arguments by repeating yourself over and over again with Tom, Jasper, Tony, Jug Monthly, Douglas, and several others in forums!
You are a type of person if you pass a shop and if you see an item behind window however that you have no intention to buy but still go inside and make a complaint!
I think you're forgetting the concept of this forum! This forum is not about UK or Canada only, there are other countries who have lotteries and will play large sums of money!
If anybody in this forum knew for sure that they will get 100 times more than they spend then they will spend that money, if I had it I would have spend it too however that you have over exaggerate the calculations!

British Colombia 28/03/2009 (last Sat)
02 03 13 19 23 36 39 (3x 3)

Canada super 7 28/03/2009 (just under your nose Gilles)
08 10 14 18 28 30 36 (3 x 8)

Greece 28/03/2009
07 17 20 27 33 35 31 (3 x 7)

Ireland (28/03/2009
01 09 20 21 38 41 14 (3 x 1)

Ohio
02 21 22 42 46 47 (3 x 2)

So, hopefully this will shut you up for good but knowing you you still come back and argue!
If you have doubt about my invetation by Camelot just phone them and ask
+44 (0)20 7016 3400, July 23 2003, at 13:00 hours
101 Wigmore St
London
W1U 1QU

You cannot and will not stop me Gilles

Moses

Ermmmmmmm...I am thinking.....stop you from doing what?.......win the jackpot??? Because I am absolutely sure that YOU are just a Pathological Liar who lives in his own fantasy world and every time somebody don't share your fantasies, you get mad.

1. All the lottery forums were taking about me. My website was amongst the top 100 before they closed it down! BS

2. Every time I put information on net I am adding new lottery in UK, they just added a new daily draw called eurotelemillions! BS

3. Rather than give you the 6 jackpot winning numbers I actually sent you a golden tray with cash deposit on it, when you receive it be careful to open it as it could be still hot! BS

4. Here are 92 sets of universal sequences for any lottery any time any place! BS

5. I sent the exact information to lottery commission and Camelot removed all the drawn order from their website! BS

6. The point from drawn order is that, it makes the prediction far too easy for those who play the larger sums or syndicate! BS

7. Based on several tests I proved that my theory will work for every single draw guaranteeing the 5 plus win if not jackpot! BS

8. I am holding the UK records for the number of times that I won (over 10,000 time) including 18 times 5 numbers but they deny me the jackpot! BS

9. I have been on UK front pages of news paper as "the man who cracked the lottrey" BS

10. In July 2003 Camelot invited me to London through Lottery Commission office and at that meeting they whispered if I would have liked to stay in London. BS

Let's see YOU dispute that!

Oh BTW, I hope you are telling the truth about Camelot inviting you to stay in London because I have just sent him an email verifying the matter.

 

[GillesD]

Last post in this thread unless ...

Yes, you and I will constantly disagree if we keep going since our basic premises are quite different, you assume all lotteries are fixed and you have found the solution and I assume that all lotteries are random and cannot be predicted with any repeatability.

But at least, I am hoping that my posts has shown you that it is best to check data before posting, so your posts will show correct data from now on.

By the way, it is most impressive that you checked so many lotteries on a worldwide basis and shown us the truth about the digital ending theory.

Oups, sorry about my previous comments but the result for the Canadian Super 7 had the right numbers but it was drawn on March 27, not March 28. I know it is just a day off but I am not sure that you also noticed this lottery is a 7/47 type lottery, so now you mix different lotteries to prove your point (also another lottery mentioned does not have a bonus number, I think). I will excuse you since you are far away. Just do not say you did this on purpose to see if I would pick on it.

At least, as far I could find out, the other 4 lottery results are right, It took me some time to confirm this and this show the tremendous resources you have at your disposal. So I wonder, maybe you did accept Camelot's offer and you are currently working for them, they must have this kind of resources. Do not bother to deny this, I know this is a cheap shot but since you did make the same accusation about me before, why not return the favor.

I will let you have the final word in this discussion (unless you make more mistakes). Can you tell all of US reading this thread, not only me, what is the true data:
A - your post # 557 with set #2 showing numbers: 47 08 33 41 24 23 28
B - your post # 561 with set #2 showing numbers: 47 08 33 41 14 23 28

Just a one letter answer (A or B) would be enough and the record would be set right once for all.

 

[Moses]

Yes, you and I will constantly disagree if we keep going since our basic premises are quite different, you assume all lotteries are fixed and you have found the solution and I assume that all lotteries are random and cannot be predicted with any repeatability.

But at least, I am hoping that my posts has shown you that it is best to check data before posting, so your posts will show correct data from now on.

By the way, it is most impressive that you checked so many lotteries on a worldwide basis and shown us the truth about the digital ending theory.

Oups, sorry about my previous comments but the result for the Canadian Super 7 had the right numbers but it was drawn on March 27, not March 28. I know it is just a day off but I am not sure that you also noticed this lottery is a 7/47 type lottery, so now you mix different lotteries to prove your point (also another lottery mentioned does not have a bonus number, I think). I will excuse you since you are far away. Just do not say you did this on purpose to see if I would pick on it.

At least, as far I could find out, the other 4 lottery results are right, It took me some time to confirm this and this show the tremendous resources you have at your disposal. So I wonder, maybe you did accept Camelot's offer and you are currently working for them, they must have this kind of resources. Do not bother to deny this, I know this is a cheap shot but since you did make the same accusation about me before, why not return the favor.

I will let you have the final word in this discussion (unless you make more mistakes). Can you tell all of US reading this thread, not only me, what is the true data:
A - your post # 557 with set #2 showing numbers: 47 08 33 41 24 23 28
B - your post # 561 with set #2 showing numbers: 47 08 33 41 14 23 28

Just a one letter answer (A or B) would be enough and the record would be set right once for all.

Hi Gilles
It is Oops not oups!
Your answer is

c

Regards,

Mo

 

[GillesD]

Last post in this thread unless ...

Thanks for the correction on the "Oops". I will take note but to my defense, I used the word "Oups", an acceptable French word, dixit (that's Latin) the Petit Robert, a French dictionary. Maybe if you posted in French, it would make my day correcting your entry.

But, as they say, it takes two to get a good game going, so I will now go at it. Looking at your post #602:

...
I don't know if "your talking about" Canadian lotto or UK, you said you do not have UK results ...

I don't understand your "referal" about August 2007 ...

Did you mean "you're talking about" instead of "your talking about" and if Webster is still right, referal is written with two RR. So let's stick to discussion on lottery matters.

And finally, I like your answer to my simple question. It shows the respect you have for the other readers of this thread. But then, you would have to admit you made an error.

 

[Moses]

Thanks for the correction on the "Oops". I will take note but to my defense, I used the word "Oups", an acceptable French word, dixit (that's Latin) the Petit Robert, a French dictionary. Maybe if you posted in French, it would make my day correcting your entry.

But, as they say, it takes two to get a good game going, so I will now go at it. Looking at your post #602:


Did you mean "you're talking about" instead of "your talking about" and if Webster is still right, referal is written with two RR. So let's stick to discussion on lottery matters.

And finally, I like your answer to my simple question. It shows the respect you have for the other readers of this thread. But then, you would have to admit you made an error.

Go on Gilles admit it
My reply put smile on your face, didn't it?
Well, few email I got and they thought it was funny as hell!

Cheers to you

Moses

 

[Flexalong]

Thanks for the correction on the "Oops". I will take note but to my defense, I used the word "Oups", an acceptable French word, dixit (that's Latin) the Petit Robert, a French dictionary. Maybe if you posted in French, it would make my day correcting your entry.

But, as they say, it takes two to get a good game going, so I will now go at it. Looking at your post #602:


Did you mean "you're talking about" instead of "your talking about" and if Webster is still right, referal is written with two RR. So let's stick to discussion on lottery matters.

And finally, I like your answer to my simple question. It shows the respect you have for the other readers of this thread. But then, you would have to admit you made an error.

Moses is bootstrapping past results with his wonder grid all the time and now that he got caught, he doesn't have the balls to admit it. But then again, what do we expect from a pathological liar.

 

[Flexalong]

Go on Gilles admit it
My reply put smile on your face, didn't it?
Well, few email I got and they thought it was funny as hell!

Cheers to you

Moses

Oh I see, your imaginary friends are sending emails to you again, this time talking about your conversation with Giles.

Come on Moses, you are suppose to crack the lottery, not crack us up.

 

[bloubul]

Hi Bloboul

Here's the 6/49 grid you asked for:

01 ------------10----------01
---------08-----------39
02-------------20----------02
---------17-----------30
03-------------30----------03
---------26-----------21
04-------------40----------04
---------35-----------12

Hi GameBelgium

Dankie vir die "Grid" verduidelik net vir my hoe jy dit gebruik.

BlouBul

 

[turtle0747]

Help with Grid

Hi Turtle

So you're stuck with the 01-----10-----01 line.

Well, there are 8 numbers between 01 and 10.
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
That's how I came up with number 8.


As for the difference between 10 and 01: you have to assume that the lottery numbers continue even beyond the highest number. In the case of the Belgian lottery, there are 42 numbers. To determine the amount of numbers between 10 and 01:
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
So there are 32 numbers between 10 and 01. Hence the 32 on the second line.

Then we do the same thing for 02-----20-----02, 03-----30-----03 etc...

As mentioned before, I did not get very good results with this grid. I got better results with the grid for a 6/49 lottery.

Hope this helps!

Could you help with a 6/53 GRID??
thanks

 

[GameBelgium]

6/53:

01----8---10---43---01
02---17---20---34---02
03---26---30---25---03
04---35---40---16---04
05---44---50----7---05
12----8---21---43---12
13---17---31---34---13
14---26---41---25---14
15---35---51---16---15
23----8---32---43---23
24---17---42---34---24
25---26---52---25---25
34----8---43---43---34
35---17---53---34---35

-A----B----C----D----E

For the excel users, you can easily make an excel sheet for this:

B=C-A-1
D=53-C+E-1

Hope this helps!

 

[turtle0747]

Thanks

6/53:

01----8---10---43---01
02---17---20---34---02
03---26---30---25---03
04---35---40---16---04
05---44---50----7---05
12----8---21---43---12
13---17---31---34---13
14---26---41---25---14
15---35---51---16---15
23----8---32---43---23
24---17---42---34---24
25---26---52---25---25
34----8---43---43---34
35---17---53---34---35

-A----B----C----D----E

For the excel users, you can easily make an excel sheet for this:

B=C-A-1
D=53-C+E-1

Hope this helps!

Yes thanks. now have to understan how to use. what page is helpful is all this mess?

 

[Moses]

From Digital Ending section

Hello to all

I have posted this in other forum and thought may be you will be interested to know too!

These are the latest UK 5 draws (results)
03,05,14,19,24,40 -- 45BB
02,17,19,28,31,47 -- 14BB
03,23,26,27,37,49 -- 47BB
01,31,32,33,36,38 -- 08BB
02,05,22,25,39,41 -- 27BB
And this is my numbers
05,12,21,30,37,46 -- 45BB
Can you or anybody sees or spot the difference between my set and the actual results? I can give you this clue that my set of numbers won't stand a chance and will be trashed, WHY?





Let’s take the latest result as example

03,05,14,19,24,40 – 45BB

If I strip the first digits off then we have
X3,x5,x4,x9,x4,x0 – x5BB

With above digital ending we can create 8 different combinations, below
03,05,14,19,24,30 – 35
03,05,14,19,24,30 – 45
03,05,14,19,24,40 – 45
03,05,14,19,34,40 – 45
03,05,14,29,34,40 – 45
03,05,24,29,34,40 – 45
03,15,24,29,34,40 – 45
13,15,24,29,34,40 – 45

This situation applies to other results too and some results have about 84 different combinations but my set you can only have one combination and no more!

05,12,21,30,37,46 – 45

If you check your results then you’ll see that most majority of the results do have multiple combinations and most single chains are indeed missing, so how can this situation happen?

If we write the digit endings like this
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 and start our selections from left to right (normal) then the chains will be multiple combinations and if we select them in reverse order then it would be single combination!
So what does this practice prove? It proves that the lotto results are selected from one (ascending) direction and keep on selecting the numbers very much the same as the loop I created!
The question is if there are many combinations with a single result?
The answer is YES there are more sequences with single result than sequences with 84 and 28 combinations put together and in fact all sequences which have 84 combinations will have one combo in reverse!
So, where are the single combination sets of sequences and how come we tend to receive 84 combos but not ones?
Can you imagine how many people out there select their numbers which is from single combo family and they stand no chance to win?
03,05,14,19,24,40 -- 45BB Multiple Combinations
02,17,19,28,31,47 -- 14BB Multiple Combinations
03,23,26,27,37,49 -- 47BB Multiple Combinations
01,31,32,33,36,38 -- 08BB Multiple Combinations
02,05,22,25,39,41 -- 27BB Multiple Combinations
And this is my numbers
05,12,21,30,37,46 -- 45BB Single Combination

Moses

 

[Kenya649]

So, where are the single combination sets of sequences and how come we tend to receive 84 combos but not ones?
Can you imagine how many people out there select their numbers which is from single combo family and they stand no chance to win?

Moses

I like your way of thinking and if you recall what biblical Moses did to Israelis. I hope you will equally lead us from zero win to Jackpot.

I did ending number analysis for 6/49 without Bonus Ball and below are my result.

1 combination----------->174,195
7 combination----------->504,315
28 combination----------->286,860
84 combination----------->26,544
210 combination----------->84

Regards

 

[Moses]

I like your way of thinking and if you recall what biblical Moses did to Israelis. I hope you will equally lead us from zero win to Jackpot.

I did ending number analysis for 6/49 without Bonus Ball and below are my result.

1 combination----------->174,195
7 combination----------->504,315
28 combination----------->286,860
84 combination----------->26,544
210 combination----------->84

Regards

Hello Kenya649

Can you explain more about those figures please! Surely they cannot be draws or results! What is 504,315?
Can you also do the same for 7 numbers including BB please!

Regards,

Moses