Master Lottery Software
- Thread starter Moses
- Start date
Springbok said:
Good morning Springbok
Well, if the combinations are unique and never been repeated before (horizontal direction left to right) then by rights they should create a new combination in vertical and diagonal direction too!
26/12/2007,18,44,08,27,23,14,48 1253----1 2 2 0 2
29/12/2007,28,23,32,04,30,13,11 1254----1 2 2 2 0
02/01/2008,25,13,37,15,39,31,41 1255----0 2 1 3 1
05/01/2008,33,49,02,20,03,12,11 1256----2 2 1 1 1
09/01/2008,28,44,39,26,24,14,45 1257----0 1 2 1 2
12/01/2008,15,18,45,11,34,06,43 1258----1 3 0 1 2
16/01/2008,29,17,22,42,08,13,43 1259----1 2 2 0 2
19/01/2008,32,30,43,45,06,10,23 1260----1 1 1 2 2
Put it this way, nobody considers that if 3 numbers appear between 30 to 39 and then three numbers between 10 to 19 are relevant BUT THEY ARE!
If you're unsure of what I am saying then perhaps you can find me in a local forum lottopost.co.uk and send me email but I am sure if you think about it then you will understand me!
Moses
Springbok said:
Hi Springbok
Do you account for the Bonus Ball (seventh digit) as well or no?
If you don't and will bring it to your calculation search then your 3000 years will become 30,000 years!
By the way Gilles D, where are you and what is your comments about this scenario?
Moses
Hello Moses
If we can get the precise digital endings for each column then you basically have defeated the lottery. The problem is that each column has a possibility of 10 digital endings. 10 to the power of 6 gives us one million possibilities of catching the precise columnar digital combination in the 6/49 game.
Is there any value in this particular technique? The answer is yes. Firstly it can be used as a screen in which to purge any proposed combinations so as to get rid of the no hope rubbish combinations. Secondly it can make the 6/49 game into two Pick3 digital games. The first three columns is game one and the second three is game 2. Using the powerful Bright3 software could possibly help to narrow down the digital combinations. These digital games are popular in America where you can chase peanut prizes . Could Bright3 solve the UK lottery?
If we can get the precise digital endings for each column then you basically have defeated the lottery. The problem is that each column has a possibility of 10 digital endings. 10 to the power of 6 gives us one million possibilities of catching the precise columnar digital combination in the 6/49 game.
Is there any value in this particular technique? The answer is yes. Firstly it can be used as a screen in which to purge any proposed combinations so as to get rid of the no hope rubbish combinations. Secondly it can make the 6/49 game into two Pick3 digital games. The first three columns is game one and the second three is game 2. Using the powerful Bright3 software could possibly help to narrow down the digital combinations. These digital games are popular in America where you can chase peanut prizes . Could Bright3 solve the UK lottery?
Springbok said:
Hi Springbok
Bonus ball is the most important ball of the game which I call it the Queen of the Balls and my recommendation is to not ignoring it for several reasons!
Bonus ball is drawn from the same machine which makes it statistically important as the rest!
I basically use coding practice to select my digits endings if I am using this system but the priority is with the settings!
For example if you predict the followings
one number will apprear between 01 to 09
Two numbers between 10 to 19
No numbers from 20s
Two numbers between 30 to 39
One number between 40 to 49 and if this settings are true then can you imagine how much you have reduced the odds with?
From this point doesn't take much to put yourself in winning position even though your last digits are pure guess!
Moses
Hi Moses
I understand but I would not include the bonus ball as I am after the six numbers for the jackpot. You might increase your chances of a win with the bonus ball but I prefer million plus prize. Bonus ball prizes are insipid. We play the lottery for the jackpot, no more no less.
You still have the problem of picking the numbers in each group. Do you pick numbers or digit endings?
I understand but I would not include the bonus ball as I am after the six numbers for the jackpot. You might increase your chances of a win with the bonus ball but I prefer million plus prize. Bonus ball prizes are insipid. We play the lottery for the jackpot, no more no less.
You still have the problem of picking the numbers in each group. Do you pick numbers or digit endings?
Springbok said:
Good morning Springbok
I appreciate what you’re saying but from the digital ending point of view all statistics and combination that creates by six numbers are inaccurate and you would miss out the most combinations which should have been developed by the Bonus ball!
How to select digital endings
If you sort out the lotto numbers in ascending orders then strip them off from the first digit, below
22/03/2008, 14,45,48,27,07,11,37 Drawn order
22/03/2008, 07,11,14,27,45,48,37 Sorted order
Digital Ending, 7 1 4 7 5 8 7
You said all combinations from lotto draws are all unique (never repeated) , 23 examples below
Digital Ending --------- Actual lotto drawn numbers
2 3 2 0 3 9 1--- 05/01/2008,33,49,02,20,03,12,11
4 4 6 8 9 4 5--- 09/01/2008,28,44,39,26,24,14,45
6 1 5 8 4 5 3--- 12/01/2008,15,18,45,11,34,06,43
8 3 7 2 9 2 3--- 16/01/2008,29,17,22,42,08,13,43
6 0 0 2 3 5 3--- 19/01/2008,32,30,43,45,06,10,23
4 2 3 5 0 6 2--- 23/01/2008,30,12,13,36,15,04,42
1 2 6 3 8 3 4--- 26/01/2008,13,43,02,06,38,01,24
7 8 7 7 0 6 1--- 30/01/2008,40,07,46,37,27,08,01
5 7 8 2 5 4 2--- 02/02/2008,05,25,34,07,18,22,12
2 5 2 5 0 8 8--- 06/02/2008,48,02,05,12,15,30,38
2 4 6 9 1 0 7--- 09/02/2008,14,40,31,02,26,29,07
9 4 4 8 2 1 3--- 13/02/2008,32,14,24,28,41,09,13
9 8 1 4 7 8 2--- 16/02/2008,48,09,37,21,24,18,22
7 7 9 1 9 4 4--- 20/02/2008,17,39,31,29,44,07,04
8 1 6 5 9 6 7--- 23/02/2008,08,25,11,39,46,16,37
6 9 0 2 8 5 0--- 27/02/2008,30,32,38,45,16,29,40
1 8 2 0 9 9 4--- 01/03/2008,12,08,20,29,01,49,04
8 4 6 9 3 7 8--- 05/03/2008,16,08,43,14,39,47,38
4 5 8 0 1 7 9--- 08/03/2008,31,04,47,30,18,15,09
1 3 6 8 1 7 7--- 12/03/2008,47,26,01,38,13,41,07
2 3 7 0 8 9 9--- 15/03/2008,48,02,40,49,23,37,29
5 1 2 5 7 5 4--- 19/03/2008,27,22,35,25,05,21,14
7 1 4 7 5 8 7--- 22/03/2008,14,45,48,27,07,11,37
A B C D E F G
All the combinations on the left hand side create codes in three directions, vertical, diagonal left to right and also right to left!
For the box A in vertical search for this code (6 digits or less)
8 4 1 2 5 7 = A
Diagonal right to left the 6 digit codes are
8 7 1 0 2 1 = A
Diagonal left to right the 6 digit codes are
4 8 8 8 5 7 = A
Therefore you have three directions which they should all come to one result and that would be you prediction!
Whilst I was writing this codes for you suddenly it clicked in my head that these are very similar to the combination to Dream Numbers lottery!
01/03/2008, 0 – 3 – 9 – 0 – 9 – 9 – 8
05/03/2008, 5 – 5 – 2 – 8 – 3 – 5 – 8
08/03/2008, 1 – 2 – 4 – 2 – 2 – 1 – 5
12/03/2008, 9 – 7 – 6 – 5 – 0 – 8 – 2
15/03/2008, 3 – 9 – 1 – 0 – 8 – 8 – 0
19/03/2008, 1 – 7 – 6 – 9 – 9 – 1 – 5
22/03/2008, 5 – 8 – 1 – 1 – 6 – 5 – 8
I am thinking this lotto and Thunder Ball and the rest of the lotteries will contain the missing combinations or the links, if you do the same search for Thunder as you did for lotto then you will find the missing gaps! Do you think you can find this out?
Moses
Hi Moses
I will run tests on the Thunderball game I assume you want me to include the actual thunderball itself.
"You said all combinations from lotto draws are all unique (never repeated)"
All digital combinations are unique up to a point. If I randomly generate one million digital combinations you will find the actual digital combinations from the real draws will repeat eventually. If you look at the results I posted a day or two ago you will see when they repeat. Some have repeated whilst some have never repeated in a million simulated draws.
I will run tests on the Thunderball game I assume you want me to include the actual thunderball itself.
"You said all combinations from lotto draws are all unique (never repeated)"
All digital combinations are unique up to a point. If I randomly generate one million digital combinations you will find the actual digital combinations from the real draws will repeat eventually. If you look at the results I posted a day or two ago you will see when they repeat. Some have repeated whilst some have never repeated in a million simulated draws.
Hi Moses
"A B C D E F G
All the combinations on the left hand side create codes in three directions, vertical, diagonal left to right and also right to left!
For the box A in vertical search for this code (6 digits or less)
8 4 1 2 5 7 = A
Diagonal right to left the 6 digit codes are
8 7 1 0 2 1 = A
Diagonal left to right the 6 digit codes are
4 8 8 8 5 7 = A
Therefore you have three directions which they should all come to one result and that would be you prediction!"
Based on what you wrote, what is the one result for A?
"A B C D E F G
All the combinations on the left hand side create codes in three directions, vertical, diagonal left to right and also right to left!
For the box A in vertical search for this code (6 digits or less)
8 4 1 2 5 7 = A
Diagonal right to left the 6 digit codes are
8 7 1 0 2 1 = A
Diagonal left to right the 6 digit codes are
4 8 8 8 5 7 = A
Therefore you have three directions which they should all come to one result and that would be you prediction!"
Based on what you wrote, what is the one result for A?
Springbok said:
Hi Springbok
You said;
<<<<<From our point of view the digit formations are unique. All digit formations in the UK game are unique and will be unique for the next 3000 years.>>>>>>
And followed by your examples
1999965
1999967
50127 6
50127 5
50127 3
50127 2
Now, if the combinations are unique in horizontal direction (left to right) and only the last digit changes then;
1- The same combinations will be unique from right to left
2- The combinations which creates in vertical and diagonal situation must be unique too BUT only in unsorted draws!
Therefore from this knowledge and your examples above will be elimination process, example if you have
5 0 1 2 7 2
5 0 1 2 7 3
In next situation with this code you will be eliminating the 2 and 3 (end digits)
In my earlier post I highlighted the numbers in vertical and diagonal directions for you which I was hoping that you have the program to check and confirm the possibility of combinations will have the same trend in other directions the same as horizontal. If I take the code above as an example and search for it in vertical then we might find the following which eliminates another two possibilities 4 and 5 (end digits)
5 5
0 0
1 1
2 2
7 7
4 5
Hope you’ll understand what I am on about but however I cannot use this digital ending system as I do not have the searching tools for it
Moses
Hi Moses
You have to use the digital ending system to scan previous results real and simulated if we are to develop your method. You have to create large files containing simulated and real draws. This makes your idea into an extremely powerful filter for any lottery game. I will explain more on Saturday. I don't think you realise how powerful it is. It parallels my research using pairs and trips.
You have to use the digital ending system to scan previous results real and simulated if we are to develop your method. You have to create large files containing simulated and real draws. This makes your idea into an extremely powerful filter for any lottery game. I will explain more on Saturday. I don't think you realise how powerful it is. It parallels my research using pairs and trips.
Springbok said:
Hi Springbok
Just take your time, it must be important to you as it is to me.
I have been trying some shortcuts to predict the end digits for past Sat draw, I was confident the first digit will be 4 which my choice of number from that was 04 but this number appeared as the first number in Thunder ball and also Daily game!
As I progress I will let you know.
Moses
Hi Moses
It takes days for ideas to ferment in the mind, sometimes weeks-something like brewing beer
At the moment this idea is emerging using your digit ideas. Pick 3 digits. You have 3 groups of 5 numbers. 5X5X5= 125. If you get the digits right then you can hit the 3 number prize in the 49s lottery giving you around £600. add a pair from the Sangoma programme then you got£7000. Add 2 pairs from the Sangoma Programme you got £125000. This is the track I am grooving along at the moment. When I first read about your idea of digits it paralleled my own research with 5 number groups, but my groups paid no attention to end digits. But I immediately realised how powerful your idea was. It made me realise how powerful my ideas were although at the time it was one of many ideas I was pursuing.
It takes days for ideas to ferment in the mind, sometimes weeks-something like brewing beer
At the moment this idea is emerging using your digit ideas. Pick 3 digits. You have 3 groups of 5 numbers. 5X5X5= 125. If you get the digits right then you can hit the 3 number prize in the 49s lottery giving you around £600. add a pair from the Sangoma programme then you got£7000. Add 2 pairs from the Sangoma Programme you got £125000. This is the track I am grooving along at the moment. When I first read about your idea of digits it paralleled my own research with 5 number groups, but my groups paid no attention to end digits. But I immediately realised how powerful your idea was. It made me realise how powerful my ideas were although at the time it was one of many ideas I was pursuing.therealpoorboy
Member
Code Theory
Hello Springbok and Moses
I have been following your thread 'Code Theory' for the last couple of posts.
I have been using this method for quite sometime now, and it is a very very powerful filter for removing unwanted combinations.
I bascially use 3 sets of static filters to generate my initial master set of combinations
For example say each combination must have:
Exactly 1 (one) of the following numbers of the set 1,2,3,4,5
Exactly 1 (one) of the following numbers of the set 5,15,25,35,45
Exactly 1 (one) of the following numbers of the set 3,14,23,32,39,40 [previous draw, (but you can use any past draw you think will break apart)]
Exactly 1-2 of any prime number between 1-49.
The above will produce 542,674 combinations, which is a good start.
If any of the filters should fail I will chase it to the next draw.
Then I do a 'RIP' on it which is using the "Code" you are talking about in your threads.
There are many variations of the 'Code' to use, however the smaller it is and the simplier it is the better it is. Use the KISS method
Varition of 15s
One variation is to convert every combination of past drawings so that they
that fit between the groupings of 1-15, 16-30, 31-45, 46-49
So the drawing of 3,14,23,32,39,40 would become 2 1 3 0
As 3 and 14 are between 1-15 which produces a 2
As 23 is between 16-30 which produces a 1
As 32 and 39 and 40 are between 31-45 which produces a 3
There are no ordinals between 46-49 so that will become a 0
Other variations are Last digits (but again I stress to use smaller groupings), groupings of 5s, groupings of 10s, but the sky is really the limit here.
Once you have produced the 'Code' variations from past drawings, you will find the best one to use after looking at the complete set.
It takes time to study this, but you'll get good at it.
For example in the above example of variation of 15s, I would only use the last 10 drawings of the 'Code" because after that the codes start to repeat and then you will remove the winning combination when you filter.
Good Luck
The Realpoorboy
P.S. If you have anything to add to the above, I would appreicate it, perhaps it might help me to brainstorm a new idea
Hello Springbok and Moses
I have been following your thread 'Code Theory' for the last couple of posts.
I have been using this method for quite sometime now, and it is a very very powerful filter for removing unwanted combinations.
I bascially use 3 sets of static filters to generate my initial master set of combinations
For example say each combination must have:
Exactly 1 (one) of the following numbers of the set 1,2,3,4,5
Exactly 1 (one) of the following numbers of the set 5,15,25,35,45
Exactly 1 (one) of the following numbers of the set 3,14,23,32,39,40 [previous draw, (but you can use any past draw you think will break apart)]
Exactly 1-2 of any prime number between 1-49.
The above will produce 542,674 combinations, which is a good start.
If any of the filters should fail I will chase it to the next draw.
Then I do a 'RIP' on it which is using the "Code" you are talking about in your threads.
There are many variations of the 'Code' to use, however the smaller it is and the simplier it is the better it is. Use the KISS method
Varition of 15s
One variation is to convert every combination of past drawings so that they
that fit between the groupings of 1-15, 16-30, 31-45, 46-49
So the drawing of 3,14,23,32,39,40 would become 2 1 3 0
As 3 and 14 are between 1-15 which produces a 2
As 23 is between 16-30 which produces a 1
As 32 and 39 and 40 are between 31-45 which produces a 3
There are no ordinals between 46-49 so that will become a 0
Other variations are Last digits (but again I stress to use smaller groupings), groupings of 5s, groupings of 10s, but the sky is really the limit here.
Once you have produced the 'Code' variations from past drawings, you will find the best one to use after looking at the complete set.
It takes time to study this, but you'll get good at it.
For example in the above example of variation of 15s, I would only use the last 10 drawings of the 'Code" because after that the codes start to repeat and then you will remove the winning combination when you filter.
Good Luck
The Realpoorboy
P.S. If you have anything to add to the above, I would appreicate it, perhaps it might help me to brainstorm a new idea