Dennis Bassboss
Member
I don't know?? I did not check it!Beaker said:Now, that is an interesting set
I don't know?? I did not check it!Beaker said:Now, that is an interesting set
But I know one thing about this one....It plays well with the serotic method that Combomaniac spoke about....Dennis Bassboss said:I don't know?? I did not check it!
Dennis, is this not the largest Delta number ? I thought we always got 2 deltas the same?Dennis Bassboss said:What is this???
1994=12
1993=13
1992=17
1991=21
1990=13
1989=15
1988=11
1987=22
1986=24
1985=23
1984=15
1983=06
1982=14
1981=11
1980=17
1979=13
1978=09
1977=27
1976=12
1975=16
Well here it is it represent the largest gap inside the winning combinations (regular numbers only)of these draws...
example draw 1994=05-17-22-34-40-47
The largest gap is 17-05=12 and 34-22=12
so 12 is the largest gap in this draw....and generally speaking in the last draws when the largest gap is at 12 or under the next draw will have a higher highest gap...
It could be interesting to use for predicting the spread of lines within your picks... Do you see this Winhunter's users And Gilles would you give us all the history on this please...My eyes are hurting me badly now...
Yes it is like compiling deltas but I do not compile them all only the highest and you do not always have 2 anyways Beaker...Yes I'll leave that one to Gilles...Beaker said:Dennis, is this not the largest Delta number ? I thought we always got 2 deltas the same?
Maybe GillesD can analyze that one.
THe way to use it is what you said - spread of line - or even with the positional grid.Dennis Bassboss said:But when counting only the highest it could be run inside the existing parameters of Winhunter Beaker!
And this set fall right into that category...Beaker said:Now, that is an interesting set
Yes, I was just looking at that one.Dennis Bassboss said:According to these stats...This could be a very awesome filter....for many lines created by Winhunter or any software!
As a general statement we can say that
68.885656% of the winning sets are having a highest gap from 10 to 19 including 10 and 19...
GillesD said:Beaker, you finally asked a challenging question (as far as my Excel skills are concerned). This is the distribution of gaps you wanted:
- 969 times (48.60%) with distribution 1-1-1-1-1 (all different gaps)
- 848 times (42.53%) with distribution 2-1-1-1 (twice one gap and the 3 other different)
- 79 times (3.96%) with distribution 2-2-1 (2 times 2 gap equal and the other one different)
- 89 times (4.46%) with distribution 3-1-1 (3 gaps equal and the other ones diferent)
- 6 times (0.30%) with distribution 3-2 (3 gaps equal and the other 2 also equal)
- 2 times (0.10%) with distribution 4-1 (4 gaps equal and the other one different)
- 1 time (0.05%) with all gaps equal
This last one is certainly most interesting one. The winning numbers for draw #670 are: 22 - 27 - 32 - 37 - 42 - 47
What a nice pattern! And I was always looking for a regular pattern but I sure missed that one. Thanks for the question, Beaker. I will now use this example to whoever says the 1-2-3-4-5-6 combination can not happen. This is as unlikely to happen as the 1-2-3-4-5-6 combination, just that the starting number is 22 and the gap is 5.
Sorry Gilles, I don't mean the value of the gaps, I am referring to the number of gapsGillesD said:Beaker, I am not sure what you wanted to say but:
Out of the 9,970 gaps (1994 x 5), 5632 of them (or nearly 56.5%) are between 1 and 6. And 2642 of them (or nearly 26.5%) are from 7 to 12.
OK thanks for the clarification and those great stats.GillesD said:I have seen the Delta theory explained with or without the lowest number.
But for me when analyzing gaps, the lowest number should not be considered, a gap being the difference between two consecutive and increasing numbers. All calculations are based on this.
I was about to ask the same thing here....Beaker said:I knew you'd like that one Thanks for this.
Now, when you do your gap analysis, do you consider the first number the first gap or just 5 gaps?
For example last draw:
5-17-22-34-40-47
Gap1 definition = 5-12-5-12-6-7 with first number included OR
Gap2 definition = 12-5-12-6-7 without first number.
If you use Gap1 definition, your numbers will go up, obviously but I think you see more pairs/triples etc. Of course if you include bonus, these go up as well.