Beaker said:I wouldn't play that 14![]()
but the rest are in play
![]()
Agreed...I wouldn't play it 40 draws out anyways. No % there at all.
Beaker said:I wouldn't play that 14![]()
but the rest are in play
![]()
I am still sticking with Peter on chancing the 14. But I do have to respect two of the smartest players here .. Beaker and Karnac. Maybe I will play 3 lines with the 14 and 3 lines without.Beaker said:I wouldn't play that 14![]()
but the rest are in play
![]()

peter said:I should have posted this yesterday, I was not surprised to see the 14 in last nights super 7, why, cause I think we will see it tonight as well in the 649.![]()
Only a genius would play it.Beaker said:I wouldn't play that 14![]()
but the rest are in play
![]()
I'm not playing itlotterydream said:Anyone else think only the 11 is a possible repeater from Wednesday's draw?
By the way, my real name is John. I am a 36 year old scholar at the University of Ottawa. I specialize in Medieval History.

Beaker said:I'm not playing it![]()
It's an open pair 10-11 so one of them might hit. I like that 49 to repeat and 34 is another good candidatelotterydream said:Thanks for your opinion Beaker.
![]()
And .. I'm not saying I'd jump to play the 11 either, but of all the numbers in Wednesday's draw it seemed the only likely candidate for repeat.
Yes they are open....He'll learn about this after a few strikes!!!Beaker said:It's an open pair 10-11 so one of them might hit. I like that 49 to repeat and 34 is another good candidate


Beaker said:I wouldn't play that 14![]()
but the rest are in play
![]()
Not playing it also....But it is on the radar folks...Florie said:No 14 for me either this draw.
