I'm happy to see that some folks are using my repeats from a consecutive theory to their advantage here....as I stated earlyer this will happen 1/3 of the time for some of these consecutives pairs....and that explain the appearance of the 40 in the last draw.dwoods99 said:The winning numbers: 03-11-13-28-40-47 and 16.
There were no winners for the $2 million.
For those who saw my note about #40 in the last draw's thread, what's up with this number !
dwoods99 said:Yep, with 39 and 40 in the last draw, that damned number 40 came up again !
I don't know but hey! Go with your instinct...you never know ,it could be starting on for another blitz of consecutives wins like it did in the past....one thing is sure I was talking of a long term set lately well yours just past the test with flying colors!Picard said:Now, should I stick with the set I changed to, or switch to the old set?
Hmmm, or both!
I do feel good about the 40 showing again.
But with not more than 1 or 2 usualy showing up from the previous draw, it would be like working with 14 or 15 numbers in the old set.