Is the Lottery Players forum splitting up?

mirage

Member
Is it too soon to tell if the players are starting to split up into different lottery camps? The 6/49 is a hard one to give up on especially as all those years of historical data. Is it possible the historical data will no longer be predictive now that the 6/49 has been fundamentally changed, and who knows what else has been revamped by the lottery corporation besides?
Only time will tell? Yes, but time, as they say is of the essence.
Meanwhile, other players have already gone mostly provincial.
There seems to be primarily 3 types of players: the math/computer lits, those who are (hopefully) making internally generated "educated guess", and then those who fall somewhere in between. I have found this forum to be extremely interesting, educational and very entertaining. It is my hope that the board will continue to be inclusive. Not exclusive, as it looks like it might start to become. Or am I completely off base?
Where do you weigh in?
 

shirazbai

Member
I don't think the board is splitting up into camp's. I think there will always be general joint interest in all lotteries accross the board, because they all share strategies. The national 649 and provincial 49 lotteries will always go hand in hand. Any strategy/software that can be used for one, can always be used for the other.
 

mirage

Member
[So Dennis, are you implying the forum is exclusively about you? And all the lotteries that you are winning?:lol:
 

mirage

Member
(Quote originally by Shirazbai)
I don't think the board is splitting up into camp's. I think there will always be general joint interest in all lotteries accross the board, because they all share strategies. The national 649 and provincial 49 lotteries will always go hand in hand. Any strategy/software that can be used for one, can always be used for the other.

Yes, but there is the primary focus of 6/49, and how to integrate strategies used in 6/49 lottery with the provincial, ie. stats resources. Call me an idiot if you will, but why has Lottario been so neglected? My opinion only, but it's a much easier lottery to win. (It doesn't have that big big jackpot, but it's nothing to sneeze at.) And while I'm on a rant, what's wrong with the lotto corp that they haven't introduced a 5 number lottery? These smaller number lotteries are quite popular in the US. Anyway, your comments, Shirazbai, were somewhat reassuring.
 
mirage said:
[So Dennis, are you implying the forum is exclusively about you? And all the lotteries that you are winning?:lol:
:lol: I made a mistake in my prior post...Should have been I'm in the winners circle...You name the lotteries.. :lol:
 

charles2

Member
mirage said:
(Quote originally by Shirazbai)
Call me an idiot if you will, but why has Lottario been so neglected? My opinion only, but it's a much easier lottery to win. (It doesn't have that big big jackpot, but it's nothing to sneeze at.)
[/B]
\


for me Lottario is bad for the same reasons that Super 7 is bad in Ontario ie. For $1 i play 1 set of my own numbers and the computer then gives me another completey random set :dang:
 

Maggie

Member
Maybe we should just all pack up and move to La Belle Province. :)

We should be able to pick our own second line of numbers.
 

gsobier

Member
Maggie:

Na, sit tight, Ontario 49 is the place ya otta be... ...so they loaded up the truck and moved to... ...well, you get the picture.

I don't know when... ...Ontario 49 might change its price... ...it only makes sense, mind you, you never know:notme:.

Regards,
George:)
Maggie said:
Maybe we should just all pack up and move to La Belle Province. :)

We should be able to pick our own second line of numbers.
 

mirage

Member
(Posted by Charles2)

for me Lottario is bad for the same reasons that Super 7 is bad in Ontario ie. For $1 i play 1 set of my own numbers and the computer then gives me another completey random set.

Yes, but: a)Super 7 costs $2 per play. b)The odds of winning Super 7 as opposed to Lottario much higher... :rolleyes:
 

mirage

Member
Originally posted by Dennis Bassboss
But unfortunately ...I don't have any stats at all for any lotto..... :confused:

Dennis, are you serious? You only have Can 6/49 stats?
:confused:
 

mirage

Member
Originally posted by mirage
Originally posted by Dennis Bassboss
But unfortunately ...I don't have any stats at all for any lotto..... :confused:

Dennis, are you serious? You only have Can 6/49 stats?
:confused:


You mean you have photographic memory and stats for lotto 6/49 only in your head??
:confused:
 
mirage said:
Originally posted by Dennis Bassboss
But unfortunately ...I don't have any stats at all for any lotto..... :confused:

Dennis, are you serious? You only have Can 6/49 stats?
:confused:
I don't even have stats for 6/49....Well I do however have a great memory and I memorize inside my head every numbers from draw to draw in various lotto... ;)
 
Karnac said:
Dennis....take a look

Originally posted by Dennis Bassboss
Here are some good ones...
10-11 has never come up with 13 or 18
14-15 has never come up with 33,22 or 29 or 07
12-13 has never come up with17
13-14 has never come up with 22
17-18 has never come up with 14 or 11
11-12 has never come up with 35
31-32 has never come up with 34
47-48 has never come up with 38
44-45 has never come up with 35 0r 08
32-33 has never come up with 43
35-36-37 never happened
48-49 has never come up with 25
16-17 never showed up with 46
15-16 never showed up with 21
20-21 never showed up with 23
03-04 never showed up with 42
04-05 never showed up with 02
07-08 never showed up with 32or 14
19-20 never showed up with 05
Here's a perrrrrrfect example of this... :lol:
 

mirage

Member
Originally posted by Karnac
Dennis....take a look

Originally posted by Dennis Bassboss
Here are some good ones...
10-11 has never come up with 13 or 18
14-15 has never come up with 33,22 or 29 or 07
12-13 has never come up with17
13-14 has never come up with 22
17-18 has never come up with 14 or 11
11-12 has never come up with 35
31-32 has never come up with 34
47-48 has never come up with 38
44-45 has never come up with 35 0r 08
32-33 has never come up with 43
35-36-37 never happened
48-49 has never come up with 25
16-17 never showed up with 46
15-16 never showed up with 21
20-21 never showed up with 23
03-04 never showed up with 42
04-05 never showed up with 02
07-08 never showed up with 32or 14
19-20 never showed up with 05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's a perrrrrrfect example of this... ...end quote)

Ok, I'll grant you that, if this is true, you have really impressive skills here.:wow:
 

mirage

Member
Originally posted by Dennis Bassboss
And of course that 12-13 came up with 17 yesterday as you know already.... :lol:

Yes, of course I know. I can memorize at least a few numbers myself. :rolleyes:
 

Sidebar

Top