Ideas for an Improved procedure

N

Nick Koutras

Member
We all select numbers for the upcoming draw.

But how can we make our selections more intelligent
based on the assumption that the previous draw
history does provide some clues as of to what may come up?


I try to collect in this thread some of your ideas.

Please post your ideas with a small description
that can be understandable so that it can be incorporated
on an algorithm.


The procedure will work backwards.
You will enter your Selections and the algorithm
will provide you the clues you used or wish to had, to select your numbers.


For example:
You enter as possible numbers: 2,14,23,45,32,11,24,10,20,30,40


The algorithm will display the clues you used to select these numbers.

For example:
Numbers in EndDigit 0 & 5 Did not show up on 4 consecutive draws
That shall trigger the algorithm to indicate that:
Numbers 10,20,30,40,5,15,25,35,45 as a group are behind x Hits.


Please do not hesitate to indicate your point of view.


We shall not expect a miracle procedure but a better one than no procedure at all!
 
M

mirage

Member
Nick Koutras said:
We all select numbers for the upcoming draw.

But how can we make our selections more intelligent
based on the assumption that the previous draw
history does provide some clues as of to what may come up?


I try to collect in this thread some of your ideas.

Please post your ideas with a small description
that can be understandable so that it can be incorporated
on an algorithm.


The procedure will work backwards.
You will enter your Selections and the algorithm
will provide you the clues you used or wish to had, to select your numbers.


For example:
You enter as possible numbers: 2,14,23,45,32,11,24,10,20,30,40


The algorithm will display the clues you used to select these numbers.

For example:
Numbers in EndDigit 0 & 5 Did not show up on 4 consecutive draws
That shall trigger the algorithm to indicate that:
Numbers 10,20,30,40,5,15,25,35,45 as a group are behind x Hits.


Please do not hesitate to indicate your point of view.


We shall not expect a miracle procedure but a better one than no procedure at all!
Click to expand...

Hi Nick,

Assuming that you are going to make algorithms created available for any to use?

Another point, the numbers that are chosen very often do not create winners. Therefore, what is the benefit of the algorithms that would be created from these numbers?

Am open to your suggestion otherwise and will provide numbers if you would work with some of mine. Elsewise, others may have "more intelligent" numbers.
:)
 
G

Grandmaster

Member
One idea is an unified set of numbers that seems to win consistely better than average for any 6/49 lotto, example:

25 Best Numbers
1 4 6 8 9 12 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 26 29 31 33 34 37 38 39 44 45 47 49 1992 - 98 6/49 CAN LOTTO (http://www.geocities.com/ixcel.geo/sets.html)
1 4 6 7 9 17 22 23 25 26 27 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 40 43 45 46 47 All CAN CAT 7
1 2 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 17 19 20 24 26 27 30 31 34 36 38 42 44 45 49 Georgia LSouth
1 2 3 5 7 12 14 18 19 20 25 27 30 31 32 33 34 35 38 40 43 44 45 46 47 All CAN CAT 6
3 4 6 7 10 12 13 15 16 17 20 21 23 25 27 29 30 34 38 40 42 44 47 48 49 SALIU BEST 25 AFTER 10000 RANDOM

15 BEST NUMBERS
8 10 12 23 27 30 31 34 38 39 40 43 44 46 47 All Can CAT 6
1 6 7 13 15 19 20 26 30 31 33 34 36 42 44 Georgia LSouth
7 14 17 24 27 29 30 31 34 38 43 44 45 46 47 All Can CAT 7

Some of the numbers were obtained using LottoStatisticsXLp 1.16.

Apparently there is a correlation in the pattern between different lotteries, if you compare the numbers 60% or more of the best numbers are the same numbers in any 6/49 lotto. More research is needed.

If we could fiind a set of 25, 20, or more numbers that hits better than average in any lotto 6/49 is a good start.
 
G

Grandmaster

Member
Another idea, for example in a 6/49 Lotto to reduce the original numbers of 13,983,816 using filters to 300,000 unique numbers that hits more often. Could that be possible or it is just impossible?, Which filters to apply? the resulting numbers are interesting, how often they hit? 1 in 4 as Szur-Can believes I don't think so, but curiosity tells me this numbers could hit more often than average.

The problem is the selection of filters.

Right, the filters and the history of the draws are no related.
 
Last edited:
G

Grandmaster

Member
Lottoarchitect has a good idea,

The error correction engine, it supposes to hits 1 in 4 jackpot, only lottoarchitect knows how its works,

Lottoarchitect if you read this could you tell us how error correction engine works? maybe Nick could implement an algorythm ..
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
Re: Re: Ideas for an Improved procedure

mirage said:
Hi Nick,

Assuming that you are going to make algorithms created available for any to use?

Another point, the numbers that are chosen very often do not create winners. Therefore, what is the benefit of the algorithms that would be created from these numbers?

Am open to your suggestion otherwise and will provide numbers if you would work with some of mine. Elsewise, others may have "more intelligent" numbers.
:)
Click to expand...

Yes the procedure will be available to all.

The benefit of the algorithm will be consistency and not "I missed that"

That is what a computer program provides.
It is up to you to come up with the correct selection of numbers
based on your assumptions and the procedure may verify that.
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
Grandmaster said:
One idea is an unified set of numbers that seems to win consistely better than average for any 6/49 lotto, example:

25 Best Numbers
1 4 6 8 9 12 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 26 29 31 33 34 37 38 39 44 45 47 49 1992 - 98 6/49 CAN LOTTO (http://www.geocities.com/ixcel.geo/sets.html)
1 4 6 7 9 17 22 23 25 26 27 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 40 43 45 46 47 All CAN CAT 7
1 2 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 17 19 20 24 26 27 30 31 34 36 38 42 44 45 49 Georgia LSouth
1 2 3 5 7 12 14 18 19 20 25 27 30 31 32 33 34 35 38 40 43 44 45 46 47 All CAN CAT 6
3 4 6 7 10 12 13 15 16 17 20 21 23 25 27 29 30 34 38 40 42 44 47 48 49 SALIU BEST 25 AFTER 10000 RANDOM

15 BEST NUMBERS
8 10 12 23 27 30 31 34 38 39 40 43 44 46 47 All Can CAT 6
1 6 7 13 15 19 20 26 30 31 33 34 36 42 44 Georgia LSouth
7 14 17 24 27 29 30 31 34 38 43 44 45 46 47 All Can CAT 7

Some of the numbers were obtained using LottoStatisticsXLp 1.16.

Apparently there is a correlation in the pattern between different lotteries, if you compare the numbers 60% or more of the best numbers are the same numbers in any 6/49 lotto. More research is needed.

If we could fiind a set of 25, 20, or more numbers that hits better than average in any lotto 6/49 is a good start.
Click to expand...


This indicates that the "weighted" method for the Best Performinf Set shall be completed.

So then we may find better sets of numbers.
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
Grandmaster said:
Another idea, for example in a 6/49 Lotto to reduce the original numbers of 13,983,816 using filters to 300,000 unique numbers that hits more often. Could that be possible or it is just impossible?, Which filters to apply? the resulting numbers are interesting, how often they hit? 1 in 4 as Szur-Can believes I don't think so, but curiosity tells me this numbers could hit more often than average.

The problem is the selection of filters.
Click to expand...

Filtering is oneother field of coversation
Please read my original question.
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
Grandmaster said:
Lottoarchitect has a good idea,

The error correction engine, it supposes to hits 1 in 4 jackpot, only lottoarchitect knows how its works,

Lottoarchitect if you read this could you tell us how error correction engine works? maybe Nick could implement an algorythm ..
Click to expand...


I do not know the concept, but only mathematically.
 
L

lottoarchitect

Member
Grandmaster said:
Lottoarchitect has a good idea,

The error correction engine, it supposes to hits 1 in 4 jackpot, only lottoarchitect knows how its works,

Lottoarchitect if you read this could you tell us how error correction engine works? maybe Nick could implement an algorythm ..
Click to expand...

I put to much effort to design this system and I plan to include it in the public versions in the future. It is very complex even to describe it, it is not a simple algorithm, it is a whole new system that can make a program of its own. I don't give details for obvious reasons.
 
C

Carlito

Member
Hey Nick can you e-mail me on this? <<<email addy deleted>>> I am very interested.:dizzy:Same with you lottoarch
 
Last edited by a moderator:
P

peter

Member
Carlito, best reread the rules, and delete your email addy.
NO Email addys allowed.
Perhaps you forgot, this is only a friendly reminder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sidebar

Top