Hints from rubronegro...moved from Q&A!
- Thread starter thornc
- Start date
rubronegro said:
I've been wondering about this for a while and since the author fell off the face of the earth and did not reply, would any of the resident numbers gurus care to take a stab at what he was talking about? His terminology (confident interval , confident gap etc.) may be what
I 'm confused about, but there is a definite strategy there. Has anyone used a similar strategy? I smell a discussion here.
savagegoose
Member
i'll take a stab
say you have a draw 2 6 13 21 33 40
the intervals between the numbers are
4 7 8 12 and 7
thats about what im thinking hes talking, rest i got no idsea
say you have a draw 2 6 13 21 33 40
the intervals between the numbers are
4 7 8 12 and 7
thats about what im thinking hes talking, rest i got no idsea
ChiefWiggum
Member
I believe he is talking about "Confidence Intervals"
Matrix,
I did not try any of Rubro's hints, in fact I even didn't look into it! The main problem is numenclature; you do not know if what he calls "confident interval" or "confident gap" is what you or anyone else understands from it!
The other problem is that the guy just popped here for some minutes wrote this, and took off without saying anything else after... in fact I don't even recall seeing him again, but LT can check this if someone requests it!
Take for fourier analisys, you can use it on the history of a given position from a given lottery (assuming that history could be described as a finite function) and by doing so, theoretically you would obtain the frequency spectrum of that history! The first problem is that fourier analisys is a base change into a complex number plane; your result are a series of complex numbers how do you interpret them! The second problem is that in lotto all numbers are positive, this means that for example the fourier transform of any series taken from it will have a strong DC component, that will make the resolution on the AC so low that he might make it unreadable!
Does this invalidate what Rubro, presented... No, it only points to the fact that if he managed to get it working properly, he is not sharing the detail that makes it work (and why should he?!), which means that you or anyone else will have to study the problem carefully to try find it also!
I did not try any of Rubro's hints, in fact I even didn't look into it! The main problem is numenclature; you do not know if what he calls "confident interval" or "confident gap" is what you or anyone else understands from it!
The other problem is that the guy just popped here for some minutes wrote this, and took off without saying anything else after... in fact I don't even recall seeing him again, but LT can check this if someone requests it!
Take for fourier analisys, you can use it on the history of a given position from a given lottery (assuming that history could be described as a finite function) and by doing so, theoretically you would obtain the frequency spectrum of that history! The first problem is that fourier analisys is a base change into a complex number plane; your result are a series of complex numbers how do you interpret them! The second problem is that in lotto all numbers are positive, this means that for example the fourier transform of any series taken from it will have a strong DC component, that will make the resolution on the AC so low that he might make it unreadable!
Does this invalidate what Rubro, presented... No, it only points to the fact that if he managed to get it working properly, he is not sharing the detail that makes it work (and why should he?!), which means that you or anyone else will have to study the problem carefully to try find it also!
Thanks, thornc
You are right.
He didn't tell us what's "confident interval" or "confident gap".
He said, First neglect the numbers of the last draw.
He said, ....If you run this figure in a BOLTZMAN'S machine at least 6 times, which is the number of balls drawn, this will result in somethinh between 3,5% and 3,9%. Various factors alter the virtual probability and the practical one. Please refer to Stochastic experiments under Monte Carlo asimulation and Boltzmann machine.
I do not think Monte Carlo and Boltzmann theory can prove this.
He siad, ...The confidence interval for any position is always 95%.
He did not prove it.
-------
Basically, I trust everyone here. Maybe I am not smart enough, so
i spend a lots time to study his theory.
You are right.
He didn't tell us what's "confident interval" or "confident gap".
He said, First neglect the numbers of the last draw.
He said, ....If you run this figure in a BOLTZMAN'S machine at least 6 times, which is the number of balls drawn, this will result in somethinh between 3,5% and 3,9%. Various factors alter the virtual probability and the practical one. Please refer to Stochastic experiments under Monte Carlo asimulation and Boltzmann machine.
I do not think Monte Carlo and Boltzmann theory can prove this.
He siad, ...The confidence interval for any position is always 95%.
He did not prove it.
-------
Basically, I trust everyone here. Maybe I am not smart enough, so
i spend a lots time to study his theory.