Global Lottery Solutions (G.L.S)

Don't. If you can get your system to yield consistently good results, I wouldn't apply any filters at all.

You can always play the '80% zone' (exclude lines with all highs and all lows, exclude lines with all odds and all evens, exclude lines with 4 or more consecutive numbers, exclude lines with a sum that is too far away from the average, exclude lines with 3 or more repeats, exclude lines with 3 or more same last digits), but I've seen so many exceptions... A good system does not require filtering. In the end, every individual combination of numbers has an equal chance of being drawn.
 

newb2

Member
Moses said:
Below is UK Sat lotto result ---------------- (compare to Wed draw)
16/01/2010, 04,07,10,14,27,4225 ---- 13/01/2010, 06,08,14,16,21,43 --- 19

Again the same scenario as Wed draw happened for last night UK lotto result, one number above 27 this time number 42 and 6 numbers below 04,07,10,27,25 which is a BAD NEWS
But the good news was there are over 173 x match 2s, 56 x match 3s and 3 x match 4s and no match 5s! What made it possible was the link or the shared number (14) between the two draws!
I did another further test for two draw ago Sat 09/01/2010, 24,33,34,48,37,20-- 25
The Bonus Ball (25) shared in both draws which created the possibility of 45 x m2s, 13 x m3s and also 1 x m4
For this Sat draw there are 560 match 3s exist in history of UK all results which I am expecting the same situation applies again but the cost of the play the game from 6/7k had increased to 500 x 500 = 25000k

Anybody has any thoughts on this or perhaps some idea to reduce the lines by proposing some kind of filtering system?

Moses

Ideally you need to reduce the number set containing all 6 or 7 winning numbers, rather than filtering out whole lines. I've found filtering also knocks out small wins too and ultimately you're no better off at landing the jackpot or a significant win.

So you need to find a consistent system that removes numbers that wont come up in the next draw...and its difficult finding a system that's consistent. You may have to play several systems at the same time.
 

Moses

Member
Global Lottery Solutions

GameBelgium said:
Don't. If you can get your system to yield consistently good results, I wouldn't apply any filters at all.

You can always play the '80% zone' (exclude lines with all highs and all lows, exclude lines with all odds and all evens, exclude lines with 4 or more consecutive numbers, exclude lines with a sum that is too far away from the average, exclude lines with 3 or more repeats, exclude lines with 3 or more same last digits), but I've seen so many exceptions... A good system does not require filtering. In the end, every individual combination of numbers has an equal chance of being drawn.

Hi GameBelgium
Chester in other forum highlighted that there are 7 numbers and in order to reduce 7 to 6 numbers there are 35 wheels so all the cost that I estimated will be 35 times more!!! I could see chester's point and below was my reply;

Hello Chester Dennis
I used to read your post with some interest some years back and always thought your comment are through logic so I appreciate your comment which is based on logic again and yes you are correct too!
I was going to reply to GameBelgium on other forum with regard to filtering system which it will rectify the problem for the seventh number! I think I have also mentioned it as well as showed it in my example but not too sure if I made myself understood!
There are two steps that I can see now which we can apply without damaging the accuracy of the data or predictions, let’s say there are two files contain match 3s one file for Wed draw (A) and one file for Sat draw (B)
The step one is to remove all duplicated triples from each file so if we have file A with 500 match 3s so by removing all duplicate triples that would perhaps reduce to 450! This will be the same case for file B to remove all duplicates!
From file A you take the very top and remaining three numbers and put it as seed search inside file B! One of these three numbers must and I mean MUST match to the remaining 4 numbers in file B! So, out of 500 results in file B perhaps 70 to 100 results will have one number the same and the rest do not match up! The number which is shared in both file (the top line of file A with the entire 70/100 lines of file B) is the link number and you can have 70to 100 lines of 6 numbers as reserve or possible prediction! So for the first or the top result of file A you would only have 100 candidates or possible prediction of 6 numbers out of 500!
Next is the second line of file A as seed which has to be analysed with file B in the same manor!
Therefore not all 500 results from one file will match up to all 500 another as there has to be one number link between the two files as my example shows in other page! This theory has to be computerised to do all the combining and then start thinking about next step! Right now the theory looks practical as it compared against results but we need a program to approve or disapprove the theory!

1464,--49,04,18,45,43,16,23,-4 – last Wed’s draw
1468,--34,43,20,24,18,49,16,-4
1564,--41,18,49,16,48,32,03,-3
1813,--15,16,49,17,18,32,43,-4 – example, take these three from this file
3252,--32,26,16,18,02,14,49,-3
5267,--10,18,25,41,43,49,11,-3
5496,--43,18,16,30,19,45,32,-3
5540,--49,43,39,33,04,16,03,-3
5622,--16,18,29,35,37,49,04,-3
Second file match 3 plus links (34,20,24) + (44,13,48 are the links) from Sat draws
There are 92 match 3s found for these lots!
0060,--04,13,02,03,42,44,24,-3
0083,--47,25,18,44,13,46,34,-3
0088,--14,44,06,25,34,20,45,-3
0109,--24,12,33,42,47,34,44,-3
0116,--12,48,36,20,28,16,34,-3
0146,--09,02,13,18,27,48,24,-3
0196,--24,34,05,48,40,37,33,-3
0238,--33,24,19,38,48,05,20,-3
0277,--27,48,46,44,05,34,49,-3
0300,--31,32,13,25,24,44,43,-3 with these four from this file
0315,--03,18,49,13,24,34,33,-3
0331,--02,03,34,27,13,48,41,-3
0360,--24,20,11,28,48,35,33,-3
0361,--46,48,10,08,12,34,20,-3
0542,--07,48,20,14,24,38,17,-3
0573,--11,31,24,49,34,18,48,-3
0625,--07,34,48,46,43,28,20,-3
0639,--13,36,02,20,40,37,34,-3
0642,--37,24,36,10,20,44,01,-3
0671,--34,44,40,19,30,26,13,-3
0688,--24,44,26,29,28,34,45,-3
0746,--32,04,20,48,49,44,27,-3 or with these four from here
0765,--13,31,44,41,33,24,05,-3
0855,--44,47,24,40,48,38,23,-3
0879,--15,18,34,24,11,44,28,-3
0987,--11,48,34,13,44,26,02,-4
1055,--11,13,05,17,48,44,25,-3 or with these four from here
1068,--44,22,34,10,24,07,18,-3
1097,--34,12,11,44,39,48,21,-3
1122,--16,27,03,44,02,48,24,-3
1144,--04,12,14,48,20,49,24,-3
1196,--40,24,19,48,30,13,31,-3
1334,--42,48,24,25,09,13,05,-3
1378,--21,31,06,20,09,34,48,-3
1394,--10,08,01,34,20,13,28,-3
1431,--18,24,20,43,30,44,47,-3
1432,--34,44,23,48,46,18,06,-3
1458,--20,44,35,02,34,40,49,-3
1465,--24,33,34,48,37,20,25,-4
1468,--34,43,20,24,18,49,16,-3
1479,--42,16,14,13,20,34,10,-3
1528,--34,49,24,26,13,03,48,-4
1591,--44,11,48,03,04,24,01,-3
1663,--14,48,05,21,20,44,28,-3
1691,--34,48,49,07,11,17,20,-3
1706,--44,13,15,49,41,37,24,-3 or with these four from here
 

Moses

Member
Update

Hello to all
For last Sat lotto draw (16/01/2010, 14,42,10,27,07,04,25) there were 606 match 3s found from all UK results! From these 606 matches (results) 149 of them matched 2 numbers to last night (Wed) result;
32 results matching 3 numbers
2 results matching 4 numbers
1 result from daily matches 5 numbers to Wed draw;
20/01/2010, 16,18,17,27,28,02,43 Lotto = m5 14/12/2006,16,17,27,25,18,02,07
Take a look at the numbers 16,17,18 and 27,28 and Thunder ball result for last night 31,32,33, and 02,03,04!
Lotto result for last night is almost the third time on a row that most numbers are below 27 and one number is above!
13/01/2010, 21,16,06,43,14,08,19
16/01/2010, 14,42,10,27,07,04,25
20/01/2010, 16,18,17,27,28,02,43

Do you think the posts on this forum have influence in results?

Moses
 

Moses

Member
Update

Moses said:
Hello to all
For last Sat lotto draw (16/01/2010, 14,42,10,27,07,04,25) there were 606 match 3s found from all UK results! From these 606 matches (results) 149 of them matched 2 numbers to last night (Wed) result;
32 results matching 3 numbers
2 results matching 4 numbers
1 result from daily matches 5 numbers to Wed draw;
20/01/2010, 16,18,17,27,28,02,43 Lotto = m5 14/12/2006,16,17,27,25,18,02,07
Take a look at the numbers 16,17,18 and 27,28 and Thunder ball result for last night 31,32,33, and 02,03,04!
Lotto result for last night is almost the third time on a row that most numbers are below 27 and one number is above!
13/01/2010, 21,16,06,43,14,08,19
16/01/2010, 14,42,10,27,07,04,25
20/01/2010, 16,18,17,27,28,02,43

Do you think the posts on this forum have influence in results?

Moses

Hello to all
Believe it or not below is the UK Sat lotto result, again one number over 27 which is 30 and 6 numbers below 27! For this result there are 640 match 3s exist in history of all results! So do you think this is the way out for Camelot to produce low key numbers with far too many match 3s so it won’t be feasible to play this system?
23/01/2010, 16,19,07,03,08,30,09
The good news was, from Wed draw all match 3 there are 95 match 2s in there plus 42 match 3s and also five match 4s, so if the both files last Sat and last Wed results were combined there would have been lots and lots of BIG wins!
Moses
 

Moses

Member
Moses said:
Below is UK Sat lotto result ---------------- (compare to Wed draw)
16/01/2010, 04,07,10,14,27,4225 ---- 13/01/2010, 06,08,14,16,21,43 --- 19

Again the same scenario as Wed draw happened for last night UK lotto result, one number above 27 this time number 42 and 6 numbers below 04,07,10,27,25 which is a BAD NEWS
But the good news was there are over 173 x match 2s, 56 x match 3s and 3 x match 4s and no match 5s! What made it possible was the link or the shared number (14) between the two draws!
I did another further test for two draw ago Sat 09/01/2010, 24,33,34,48,37,20-- 25
The Bonus Ball (25) shared in both draws which created the possibility of 45 x m2s, 13 x m3s and also 1 x m4
For this Sat draw there are 560 match 3s exist in history of UK all results which I am expecting the same situation applies again but the cost of the play the game from 6/7k had increased to 500 x 500 = 25000k

Anybody has any thoughts on this or perhaps some idea to reduce the lines by proposing some kind of filtering system?

Moses
Hello to all

27/01/2010, 01 04 07 11 13 27 – 12 UK lotto result

Yet again another result which all numbers are fallen in to daily draw skirt, all 7 numbers 27 and below!!!!

The side effect for this typical result is;

Match 6 ------------5 ------------£264,490 ----- £1,322,450

Match 5 +BB -------41------------£9,924 -------- £406,884

Match 5 -------------1,402 ------£181------------£253,762

Match 4 -------------46,269 ----£12 -------------£555,228

Match 3 -------------550,174---£10--------------£5,501,174

I can say this is the poorest payout ever, the difference in prize payout for matching 4 numbers is £12 but for matching 3 numbers is £10!!

There are number of issues that I can pick from this result;

Camelot is reading all the posts and trying to prove they’ll go to extreme measures even though if they have to break all the law of math and physics in order to stop this theory from working but as yet this seems to be the only solution they have so they are not ahead of us which is good news!

There are good few readers on this forum(UK based) have already build the program and hitting Camelot with masses of predictions which means Camelot is already cornered and desperate for air!

One thing for sure is that, I cannot accept 5 draws on row to have 6 numbers below 27 as we started this thread as it looks all of sudden UK results are gone 30s and 40s shy!

Any ideas?
Moses
 

Moses

Member
Moses said:
Hello to all

27/01/2010, 01 04 07 11 13 27 – 12 UK lotto result

Yet again another result which all numbers are fallen in to daily draw skirt, all 7 numbers 27 and below!!!!

The side effect for this typical result is;

Match 6 ------------5 ------------£264,490 ----- £1,322,450

Match 5 +BB -------41------------£9,924 -------- £406,884

Match 5 -------------1,402 ------£181------------£253,762

Match 4 -------------46,269 ----£12 -------------£555,228

Match 3 -------------550,174---£10--------------£5,501,174

I can say this is the poorest payout ever, the difference in prize payout for matching 4 numbers is £12 but for matching 3 numbers is £10!!

There are number of issues that I can pick from this result;

Camelot is reading all the posts and trying to prove they’ll go to extreme measures even though if they have to break all the law of math and physics in order to stop this theory from working but as yet this seems to be the only solution they have so they are not ahead of us which is good news!

There are good few readers on this forum(UK based) have already build the program and hitting Camelot with masses of predictions which means Camelot is already cornered and desperate for air!

One thing for sure is that, I cannot accept 5 draws on row to have 6 numbers below 27 as we started this thread as it looks all of sudden UK results are gone 30s and 40s shy!

Any ideas?
Moses
I just went to Camelot Website and checked the prizes payout;

26/12/09, --- Match 5+BB --- 14 ---£90,487

30/12/09, --- Match 5+BB --- 04 ---£251,567

02/01/10, --- Match 5+BB --- 12 ---£132,388

06/01/10, --- Match 5+BB --- 06 ---£131,475

09/01/10, --- Match 5+BB --- 07 ---£231,349

13/01/10, --- Match 5+BB --- 12 ---£59,071

16/01/10, --- Match 5+BB --- 17 ---£65,335

20/01/10, --- Match 5+BB --- 02 ---£347,312

23/01/10, --- Match 5+BB --- 40 ---£28,705

27/01/10, --- Match 5+BB --- 41 ---£9,924

Is there something wrong? Perhaps not

Moses
 
Very interesting results, intriguing even.

I've followed this thread on both this forum and on lotterypost, it looks like a lot of people jumped on the wagon, I hope it gets us somewhere :thumb:
 

Moses

Member
Global Lottery Solutions

GameBelgium said:
Very interesting results, intriguing even.

I've followed this thread on both this forum and on lotterypost, it looks like a lot of people jumped on the wagon, I hope it gets us somewhere :thumb:

Hi GameBelgium
I hope so too! In other forum members got together and as you know Jimmy developed program, so far so good!.. But does anybody paying any attention to UK lotto results?
03/02/2010, 03 - 11 - 12 - 20 - 21 - 28 -31 BB
For the past seven weeks we had two numbers from 30s family (30 31) and 4 numbers from 40s group (40 - 42 - 43 - 44) the rest were below 28!!!
Any thoughts on that?
Moses
 

Moses

Member
Global Lottery Solutions

Moses said:
Below is UK Sat lotto result ---------------- (compare to Wed draw)
16/01/2010, 04,07,10,14,27,4225 ---- 13/01/2010, 06,08,14,16,21,43 --- 19

Again the same scenario as Wed draw happened for last night UK lotto result, one number above 27 this time number 42 and 6 numbers below 04,07,10,27,25 which is a BAD NEWS
But the good news was there are over 173 x match 2s, 56 x match 3s and 3 x match 4s and no match 5s! What made it possible was the link or the shared number (14) between the two draws!
I did another further test for two draw ago Sat 09/01/2010, 24,33,34,48,37,20-- 25
The Bonus Ball (25) shared in both draws which created the possibility of 45 x m2s, 13 x m3s and also 1 x m4
For this Sat draw there are 560 match 3s exist in history of UK all results which I am expecting the same situation applies again but the cost of the play the game from 6/7k had increased to 500 x 500 = 25000k

Anybody has any thoughts on this or perhaps some idea to reduce the lines by proposing some kind of filtering system?

Moses

Hello to all

Whilst I am putting all my concentrations on the new theory to find an easier solution, I found this piece of information very interesting and I thought to tell you about it as I have no doubt in my mind this will add more pressure to the local operators whereas in recent weeks we tend to have a lot of repeated numbers in results especially in main lotto draw where numbers are below 30s!

Here it is; you know how I say lotteries are linked one to another and triples are shifted side to side or lottery to lottery... so I did this test and believe you me this is a killer, money making scheme for even small syndicates!
Well, let’s take the last Wed draws (lotto, thunder, daily, eurotelemillions) and combine them all in one large wheel
03/02/2010, 11,03,12,28,21,20,31 --- Lotto
03/02/2010, 18,34,05,17,24,11 ------Thunder
03/02/2010, 08,12,05,10,14,02,21 --- Daily
03/02/2010, 15,19,21,29,33,36,20 --- Eurotele

11,03,12,28,21,20,31,18,34,05,17,24,08,10,14,02,15,19,29,33,36 = 21 unique numbers
02,03,05,08,10,11,12,14,15,17,18,19,20,21,24,28,29,31,33,34,36 = Sorted, find match 7 for them = 123 match 7s in history of all UK draws!!

Below is Sat lotto result
06/02/2010, 22,12,03,29,17,15,05

Out of 123 match sevens 6 lines will match 4 numbers (every set of 4 numbers has three wheels of 3 numbers) and 21 lines match 3s (or 39 match 3s if not counting match 4s) to Sat draw
If you play pick 4s then you have to play the wheels for 123 lines which is 4,305 lines or rather £4,305 in money terms so how much you will win if you play pick 4s?
Each pick 4s pays out £7,000!
6 x £7,000 = £42,000
£42,000 - £4,305 = £37,695 profit for a little investment!
If you play pick 3s it will cost you the same money but you'll win 39 x £400 = £15,600 so you still pocket money BIG TIME!

Now, watch the UK results how fast will turn around!
I guess the END is near now, what do you think!

Moses
 

Moses

Member
Match 3

Hello to all

Before I move on to part 2 I have this question;

Does anybody know that how many lines of 6 numbers required to guarantee three number match (£10 win in UK) in lotto 649 and can you please list the lines here!

Moses
 
Hi Moses

If you wanted a guaranteed 3 from 6 win, that would require 163 lines for a 6/49 lottery.

Much more interesting though, if you were to look for a 3if3 win, that would require 1090 lines.

I'm not going to post the 1090 lines, but here are the 163 lines for a guaranteed 3 from 6 win:

01 02 03 04 05 06
01 02 07 47 48 49
01 03 05 07 15 26
01 03 05 08 11 27
01 03 05 13 24 49
01 03 12 14 20 48
01 04 08 13 15 48
01 04 12 13 15 47
01 05 18 21 22 25
01 06 08 12 24 26
01 06 24 26 47 48
01 08 11 14 19 21
01 08 11 16 18 20
01 08 11 17 22 27
01 12 14 18 25 27
01 12 16 17 21 25
01 12 19 20 22 25
01 14 17 20 25 47
01 16 18 19 47 48
02 03 07 08 12 49
02 04 06 08 25 47
02 04 06 11 12 48
02 04 06 16 19 27
02 04 15 24 25 27
02 05 06 07 13 27
02 05 11 13 25 26
02 05 15 16 24 26
02 07 14 18 20 49
02 07 17 21 22 49
02 11 15 19 24 49
02 13 14 16 22 26
02 13 17 18 19 26
02 13 20 21 26 27
02 14 15 17 20 24
02 15 18 21 22 24
03 04 13 15 47 48
03 05 08 12 20 25
03 06 08 24 26 48
03 06 12 24 26 47
03 08 12 14 16 22
03 08 12 17 18 19
03 08 12 21 27 47
03 11 14 18 27 47
03 11 16 17 21 47
03 11 19 20 22 47
03 14 19 21 25 48
03 16 18 20 25 48
03 17 22 25 27 48
04 05 07 11 24 25
04 05 13 19 26 49
04 06 11 26 27 49
04 07 14 16 22 24
04 07 16 25 26 49
04 07 17 18 19 24
04 07 20 21 24 27
04 13 14 15 18 21
04 13 15 17 20 22
04 14 17 20 26 49
04 18 21 22 26 49
05 06 11 15 25 49
05 08 14 18 27 48
05 08 16 17 21 48
05 08 19 20 22 48
05 11 14 16 17 19
05 12 14 19 21 47
05 12 16 18 20 47
05 12 17 22 27 47
06 07 11 13 15 16
06 07 13 14 17 20
06 07 13 18 21 22
06 07 13 19 24 25
06 14 15 16 22 49
06 14 17 21 24 26
06 15 17 18 19 49
06 15 20 21 27 49
06 18 20 22 24 26
07 08 15 25 26 47
07 11 12 15 26 48
07 15 16 19 26 27
08 13 24 25 47 49
09 10 23 28 29 46
09 10 30 31 42 43
09 10 32 33 44 45
09 10 34 37 38 40
09 10 35 36 39 41
09 23 30 33 34 36
09 23 31 32 35 37
09 23 38 39 42 45
09 23 40 41 43 44
09 28 30 37 41 45
09 28 31 34 39 44
09 28 32 36 38 43
09 28 33 35 40 42
09 29 30 35 38 44
09 29 31 36 40 45
09 29 32 34 41 42
09 29 33 37 39 43
09 30 32 39 40 46
09 31 33 38 41 46
09 34 35 43 45 46
09 36 37 42 44 46
10 23 30 32 38 41
10 23 31 33 39 40
10 23 34 35 42 44
10 23 36 37 43 45
10 28 30 36 40 44
10 28 31 35 38 45
10 28 32 37 39 42
10 28 33 34 41 43
10 29 30 34 39 45
10 29 31 37 41 44
10 29 32 35 40 43
10 29 33 36 38 42
10 30 33 35 37 46
10 31 32 34 36 46
10 38 39 43 44 46
10 40 41 42 45 46
11 12 13 24 48 49
11 12 20 21 27 48
11 18 22 25 47 48
13 16 19 24 27 49
14 17 18 21 22 27
16 19 20 21 25 27
23 28 30 35 39 43
23 28 31 36 41 42
23 28 32 34 40 45
23 28 33 37 38 44
23 29 30 37 40 42
23 29 31 34 38 43
23 29 32 36 39 44
23 29 33 35 41 45
23 30 31 44 45 46
23 32 33 42 43 46
23 34 37 39 41 46
23 35 36 38 40 46
28 29 30 31 32 33
28 29 34 35 36 37
28 29 38 39 40 41
28 29 42 43 44 45
28 30 34 38 42 46
28 31 37 40 43 46
28 32 35 41 44 46
28 33 36 39 45 46
29 30 36 41 43 46
29 31 35 39 42 46
29 32 37 38 45 46
29 33 34 40 44 46
30 31 34 35 40 41
30 31 36 37 38 39
30 32 34 37 43 44
30 32 35 36 42 45
30 33 38 40 43 45
30 33 39 41 42 44
31 32 38 40 42 44
31 32 39 41 43 45
31 33 34 37 42 45
31 33 35 36 43 44
32 33 34 35 38 39
32 33 36 37 40 41
34 36 38 41 44 45
34 36 39 40 42 43
35 37 38 41 42 43
35 37 39 40 44 45
 

Moses

Member
Global Lottery Solutions

Hi GameBelgium
Thanks for the list, as you probably know there is similar list on other forum which we tried to create all wheel 3 for every single line as then join the triples back together to create new lines. All the new lines after is filtered must take match 6 (jackpot number) as well as other smaller prizes but so far one member created 4.4 millions of new combos which is not to my expectations.
I am still working on it though!

Moses
 

Moses

Member
Global Lottery Solutions Part 2

Hello to all
In part two which is about Drawn Order results you need to have my database which is created of 600,000 entries (strings of 7 numbers) which can compete with 432 billions of combinations, this may sound so silly but it is true and the reason is true is because all the lottery results are produced from this database!
This database can reveal so much true information such as links, skips, rotations, diversions and correct ball positions etc as well as matching up to 6 numbers to results and in some cases in exact drawn order!
This database is compatible to any results up to 98 numbers...so, I need a location to upload it! On this forum I can only upload 10,000 characters and no more so you will receive it in dribs and drabs but I would like you to have this database as whole piece!
Any suggestions..?
Moses
 

Moses

Member
Global Lottery Solutions Part 2

Paqel said:
Hello

Moses you can use www.zeta-uploader.com

After uplaoding please add on the post link.

Paul
Hi Paul
Thanks for the link!
The copy of database can be downloaded from here!

http://zeta-uploader.com/2087578354

Regards, Moses
 

Moses

Member
The Power of database

Moses said:
Hi Paul
Thanks for the link!
The copy of database can be downloaded from here!

http://zeta-uploader.com/2087578354

Regards, Moses

Hello to all
Below is Eurotelemillion result for last Wed draw
14/04/2010, 13,18,23,35,39,44,28

There three match 6s in database
35 23 39 08 44 28 13 Second prize winner
13 23 35 18 44 39 47 Jackpot winner
23 35 13 28 44 24 18 Second prize winner
Compare your result to this database
Moses
 

bloubul

Member
Hi Moses
Will you please be so kind to re-upload the database but as an 2003 Excel version.

Thank you
BlouBul :cool:
 

Moses

Member
Database

bloubul said:
Hi Moses
Will you please be so kind to re-upload the database but as an 2003 Excel version.

Thank you
BlouBul :cool:

Hello Bloubul
I have uploaded the new version as well as .txt version for you guys, hope this helps you!

File saved as Excel 97-2003
http://zeta-uploader.com/1135889876

File saves as .txt version
http://zeta-uploader.com/349858347

In the meantime, the database took FOUR match 6s to last night’s UK lotto result!
17/04/2010, 44,29,03,10,36,31,45

10 44 45 29 30 03 36
10 44 45 29 36 03 49
36 10 44 38 45 03 31
36 10 44 38 29 03 31

Try your local results with this database!
Moses
 

Sidebar

Top