Colin Fairbrother sticks to science, probability, data analysis and adequate testing using my own programs. I have no problem with numerologists as long as they are open about their occultist beliefs. I DO have a problem with numerologists that try to pass off their beliefs as rational and wish to engage in dialog with rational people on the basis of accepting a whole raft of their wishy washy, numerology baloney.
For Pick 3 a lot of people have found useful my chart published September 2005 for 9 sets consisting of 10 Doubles 3-way with equal likelihood and 10 sets consisting of 10 Unmatched 6-way with equal likelihood plus the 10 Triples. See -
PICK 3 BASE NUMBERS 6-WAY, 3-WAY & 1-WAY
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=304&FID=46&PR=3
For Jackpot games the best set to play is that which uses the full Pool, does not duplicate paying subsets and with coverage at next best play. Increasing the coverage by distortion does not increase the yield. See -
COVERAGE ALONE DOES NOT GIVE THE BEST LOTTO YIELD
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=623&FID=46&PR=3
The only exception so far to that is the C(12,6,3,3,2)=22.
Johnny come latelies should be careful about being condescending, for what is relatively new to them is old hat to others. Ignorance of what others have contributed over the years is not an excuse for peddling rubbish or not taking the time to check out their previous posts.
Colin Fairbrother