Full-Spectrum picks (sets) - how to isolate the winning line

DaveT

Member
As promised , I now begin a thread looking at Full-Spectrum picks ( 1-4 sets), generated as per the website of our member 'blitzed':

http://crazynuts.hollosite.com/649_lottery_picks/

I play the UK lotto 6/49 main draw, so will look at those results for the purposes of this exercise.


The idea with these sets is you are using all (or most) of the numbers to generate 8 sequences of 6 numbers, with consequentially different numbers in every line.

What you are effectively doing is progressively eliminating numbers from the field, so that on certain occasions the odds of capturing a winning line someway down each set are MUCH BETTER.

Here is the first of 4 sets which I generated earlier today (4th August 2007)

SET#1:

02 04 14 19 31 46
10 20 35 44 45 48
15 18 28 33 36 37
27 30 39 40 42 47
05 12 23 25 26 29 <<<<<< this line yielded 4 winning numbers,next draw
01 06 07 09 22 38
08 11 16 17 32 34
03 21 24 41 43 49
13

A few hours later , this was the UK 6/49 draw result (for 4th Aug 2007):

* * * * *
12 23 25 26 34 49 Bonus 4


As you can see, the 5th line in the above set was a winner, matching 4 main numbers for a prize of £74 (for one winning line)

This happens VERY FREQUENTLY, and I've seen 5 in one line occasionally, too

Now, the task (to try to catch ALL 6 numbers for the jackpot) is to:

A) ISOLATE the line(s) which will match 4 or more numbers, for the next draw.

b) Add up to 3 MORE numbers to that sequence, to form a (max) 9-number Full Wheel, WHICH ULTIMATELY WILL CONTAIN ALL 6 WINNING NUMBERS.


But HOW?

My best method is to :

A) Study the last few draws (in seqence) on a GRID or MATRIX, and become familiar with the typical patterns that seem to form and dissipate.

On the (blank) space for the next draw results, overlay (or pencil in) each Full-Spectrum pick until you 'see' a more typical pattern progression.

I regularly get a good 'feeling' for a sequence if I see some logical progression which has occured in the past, starting to play out again, week to week. THIS DOES HAPPEN, YOU JUST NEED TO LEARN THE STRUCTURES.

B) Having isolated (at least one) Full-Spectrum pick line, I ADD 3 numbers from the adjacent picks , according to the results GRID and where I see each of the EXRTA 3 numbers occuring.

This now gives me a carefully selected, diligently pin-pointed sequence of 9 numbers, which I then enter as a 6 FROM 9 Full Wheel, which yields multiple winning lines if you are a winner.

In this Wheel, 3 numbers wins £200, 4 numbers averages £1100, 5 numbers nets £9000 (av) and ofcouse the chances of matching 5+B or 6 numbers are greatly improved.
 

blitzed

Member
hiya DaveT,

I read your other post, nice work on your creative use of Full Spectrum picks :thumb:

Full Spectrum sets can also be fortified with diagonals across the matrix, as well as staggered picks - the 6 columns can be looked at as 3 columns of pairs...or 2 columns of trios, then stagger out additional picks.

cheers!
blitzed
 

DaveT

Member
Thanks again, blitzed.

I've found another way of generating (or assembling) 'full spectrum' pick sets, which fulfills my need to construct 5 lines of 9 numbers (instead of 8 lines of 6) - for potential entries in a 6 From 9 Full Wheel.

Go to:

http://www.random.org/sequences/

This allows you to generate a RANDOM list (or sequence) of any number range you enter.

So just enter 1 to 49, and the program will list all 49 numbers randomly ;(apparently the program uses random noise instead of a 'seed' like most pseudo-random number generators)

Then you can sub-divide the random list (of 49) into groups, for instance, print it out and rule off each set of 9 , to give you 5 sets of 9 numbers (you need to rearrange each sub-set into numerical order yourself)

THIS is what I was looking for - the ability to generate full-spectrum sets with up to 9 numbers per line, without having to use my trusty (and worn) pack of home-made cards (!) :rolling:
 

DaveT

Member
By the way -

- since I began regularly constructing 'full-spectrum' picks sets with 9 NUMBERS per line - 5 X 9 = 45 numbers used - (whether by hand or by computer), I've seen some very encouraging occurrances:

1) With astonishing regularity, a line of 9 numbers (from a full-spectrum set) will MATCH 5 from one of the last 8 draws (GRRR!). This happens almost every week.

It's just a matter of time before one hits for the next draw (and I have isolated it, ofcourse)

2) SO far, 3 sequences thus generated have MATCHED ALL 6 NUMBERS from one of the last 8 draws (GRRR again!) - again, it's just a matter of time before one of these lines matched ALL 6 FOR THE NEXT DRAW.


And that, gents, is what we all want, is it not? :beer:
 

Springbok

Member
You use 8 X 6 lines. If you used a 6 X 6 formation you would get a better concentration of winning numbers per line. This would mean you would have to discard 13 numbers. Would this not make your job easier?
 

blitzed

Member
DaveT said:
Thanks again, blitzed.

I've found another way of generating (or assembling) 'full spectrum' pick sets, which fulfills my need to construct 5 lines of 9 numbers (instead of 8 lines of 6) - for potential entries in a 6 From 9 Full Wheel.

Go to:

http://www.random.org/sequences/

cool, good luck with that. white-noise is an excellent source for random numbers. I actually used to get random values from whitenoise generated by the sound chip on my old Commodore 64 computer back in the 80's :thumb:

anyway, l've been workin on an interactive random set generator, but I'm stuck on a glitch - sometimes a set of 9 ends up only bein 8. for some reason, one of the elements in the number array is blank, and I haven't had any luck with workarounds or methods to remove the rogue element bleh! I guess I have to search the PHP.net site and hope to find a reason why there would be an blank element goofin things up.

later,
blitzed
 

blitzed

Member
hiya Springbok,

DaveT uses a 5x9 matrix of unique random numbers...then he selects the line that gives him the best feel, and goes with a 9 number wheel on it from what I understand.

seeya,
blitzed
 

madam

Member
blitzed

:nopity: blitzed: I should lmpw whaat a matrix is. My math lessons are very back and the memory is not what it used to be. DaveT also use the phrase matrix grid? Would you be generous and give me an example of what he means. I can follow most of what he says. I haven't quite got the feel for recognizing groups or similar details but given time and study it will come. He does quote large wins for small #'s.
As long as we can play the betting with our winnings then all is grand.
madam
 

blitzed

Member
hiya madam, it is best to let DaveT explain, afterall he started this thread :)

Full Spectrum picks have given me the best luck, but DaveT has taken it a step further.

I wonder if a simple 9 number wheel would yield the same results he is chasing. Ah, I forgot about the random wheels I was experimenting with for Super7:
http://crazynuts.hollosite.com/747_super7_lottery_picks/
It is good to run test scenarios in tandem, I''ll frankenstein that code and cobble together some for testing on 6/49 :)

seeya,
blitzed
 

DaveT

Member
Blitzed - Thanks for that. I will compare, but my strategy is (as you mention) to generate a 5X9 full spectrum set (ignoring the last 4 numbers) and PICK OUT from these sets the seqeuence which gives me the best 'feel' as you put it.

I'd go beyond that, and say that I choose the sequence which shows up the most 'readable' (or 'typical') progression on the results grid which I keep up-dated.

Which brings me to my explanation:

Madam -

A 'matix' of full spectrum picks is simply a random set of all 49 numbers arranged into 5 (or 6 or 8,etc) sequneces.

But I think what you are alluding to is my description of a 'martix' or 'grid' of past results.This is simply a graphical method of visualising , say , the past 10 draw results.

I think most people would do it like this:

Create a reference grid by listing all 49 numbers to the left (the x-axis), and the date of each draw at the bottom (the y-axis).

In each column of 49 squares, mark or fill in the boxes which represent the numbers for the draw. What you build is like a bit-map, a pictorial representation of the last (10)draws.

HOWEVER, I prefer to show EACH NUMBER IN EACH COLUMN, and circle or cross, (not fill in) the numbers for each draw in successive colums. I find this easier to 'read' as you can see instantly which numbers came up where (on the grid) without having to refer back to the left (ref) column of numbers.

I create an extra 'blank' column at right, to 'try out' next week's possibilities.

I keep a rolling chart of the last 10 draws in this manner,and spend somew time each day studying the way the numbers are progressing (from week to week) in various parts of the grid.

After a while you begin to spot familiar patterns which have occurred before elsewhere, which MIGHT POSSIBLY be panning out again, in a different part of the grid (say, in the 30's ,you recognise a structure which you saw a few weeks ago in the 10's , for example)

It's like learning the 'hidden logic' within the endless progression of random results. After a while I find I can (on certain weeks) get a strong intuitive 'feel' for how these little patterns will continue.

BUT, I DON'T just try to 'aim consiously' at next week's numbers, using this grid. You can quickly find yourself placing numbers, doubting , erasing and replacing numbers, etc, etc.

What I do is to generate my full-spectrum sets (I use 9 numbers per line for wheeling) AND THEN 'try out' each sequence on the grid (at right) to see which (if any) TYPICALLY AND INTUITIVELY FIT into the continuation (or progression) of the results.

Anyhow, that's my method. Hope you got it. :eek:
 

blitzed

Member
DaveT said:
Blitzed -

Excellent! This is just what I need.

You are a gent. Have one on me...:beer:

you are most welcome, no problem...perhaps I'll even allow the lines to be unsorted, then numbers will be even more unbiased.

cheers!
blitzed
 

DaveT

Member
Blitzed -

No, I would prefer to have the 5 X 9 full spectrum sets presented as they stand, in numerical order.

For unsorted spectra, one can use :

www.random.org

as previously mentioned.
 

DaveT

Member
It's Sat 11th August 2007. UK Lotto 649 has a rollover draw tonight (£7m).

I have generated several sets of full spectrum pick sets (5X9) as usual,, and now will enter my favoured sequence of 9 numbers (as a 6 from 9 Full Wheel = 84 lines)

(I use Gail Howard's software to wheel the numbers FULLY into all the cominations of 6)

Confidence is medium at best (I've not had a win for 6 weeks), but here goes:

My best line (of 9) is:

08 10 16 17 22 24 29 32 43.

Let's see if and when my foreacts are correct.. I will do most weeks to demonstrate my strategy.
 

blitzed

Member
veronica said:
Has anyone won a second prize or jackpot with numbers from the crazynuts site, Blitzed?

regards

hiya veronica,

many people from all over the world visit my website every day and use the lottery tools. it is possible that there has been a 2nd prize winner, maybe even a jackpot, but I wouldn't know about it. I don't run a forum or have an email contact form on my website.

also, it wouldn't be practical for me to do heaps of programming to track site performance against recent lottery draws. my website is simply a hobby, it is using free webhosting, and has limited database storage.

seeya,
blitzed
 

DaveT

Member
Blitzed - I used the above line from your 9-number full-spectrum for tonight's draw.

You are not going to BELEIVE THIS-

No, my favoured line DID NOT yield this Saturday.

BUT (and I want to CRY right now) my 2nd choice (which I DID NOT ENTER) actually came up with ALL 6 NUMBERS for Tonight's draw - a £7m rollover.

Here is tonight's UK result:

6 10 11 19 22 46 Bonus 40.

And here is the full-spectrum set, from your new site, which contained the winning WHEEL:

01 13 24 25 27 31 41 43 44
07 08 12 14 29 32 37 39 45
09 16 17 20 23 30 34 35 49
02 03 05 18 21 28 38 40 48
04 06 10 11 19 22 42 46 47 <<<<<<< HERE ARE ALL 6 NUMBERS!!!!
15 26 33 36

Check the above result for tonight. I generated this set just this morning, but disregarded it in favour of an earlier set. :burnt: :burnt: :burnt:

That 9-number line is worth a potential £7 million tonight.

Oh well, c'est la vie...and all that...:eek:
 

Sidebar

Top