Dennis Bassboss
Member
I'm sorry...Karnac it just came out like that...Karnac said:I'm with Beaker on the analize
Could be a pain in the butt
Feb 2 Discussion
- Thread starter Sheba
- Start date
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Yep have everything about that ready to go,go,go...Haven't used that DN tracker stack for a while though...I'll check it now...Beaker said:Not sure if you're still updating your WinHunter history but check your DNTracker stack
There's going to be a BIG winner here
Dennis Bassboss
Member
2138 and 1709 are showing what I wanted to see... 
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Beaker said:That 17-42 is part of alot of high draws starting with 17
Dennis Bassboss
Member
09 draws starting in first position and 27 when starting in second position...Beaker said:That 17-42 is part of alot of high draws starting with 17
Or 09 in first and 18 in second (bonus included)=27 drawsIt is a lot...And it might be coming to the show...
Beaker
Member
I would consider 41-42-43 the best.Dennis Bassboss said:2138 and 1709 are showing what I wanted to see...
Peter has been calling for a triple for the past few draws
There are other good ones like:
10-11-12 or 11-12-13 or
34-35-36 or
35-36-37 and a real long-shot but could spoil is 22-23-24
Dennis Bassboss
Member
I think that the lower 40s will hit I will target this area...Beaker said:I would consider 41-42-43 the best.
Peter has been calling for a triple for the past few draws
There are other good ones like:
10-11-12 or 11-12-13 or
34-35-36 or
35-36-37 and a real long-shot but could spoil is 22-23-24
The scary ones are in the low 30s...
that 34 is hot and 35 also....
I don't think that the lower 10-11-12 will hit this draw...soon but not for the very next 
but that is only my humble opinion here...Humble hum... Dennis ..... I notice that on many stats you go back 50,60,100 draws or more. I realize that to establish a trend that one must dig into the history of the database, but I wonder do we all outdate our predictions by going back so far to construct a trend.....I always followed that mantra of going back many games, but recently I've had more success by keeping it smaller, a snapshot of the database seems to be just fine , especially with the number of hits and LDs'. A 10 or 15 draw database gets me far more excited than draws that occurred 2 years ago. The small amount of draws allow me to connect with the flow of the numbers, in effect I see the randomness of the numbers happening. Of course there are those who combine short and longterm data to produce their selections , but I'm starting to question this premise. This idea arose last draw when I was the only player who selected 34 to hit. It of course didn't this time , but it had hit 6 times in the last 10 draws, hottest number in the last 10 and it was shunned. It's in my picks again this draw for sure, as a DN. I feel you have to play them when they're hitting or you're throwing your money away. For example 9/12 numbers in the dancing set have hit in the past 5 draws, triggering interest in the set. Credible thinking says several hits here is quite possible, but we've only used 5 draws to point the way to this set. Does anyone share these thoughts or am I going to win it alone..
.Dennis Bassboss
Member
What you said is right overall... (there's even a theory that look only at last 4 and 6 draws) I for myself have always said that you must look at history from various or different time frame...Karnac said:Dennis ..... I notice that on many stats you go back 50,60,100 draws or more. I realize that to establish a trend that one must dig into the history of the database, but I wonder do we all outdate our predictions by going back so far to construct a trend.....I always followed that mantra of going back many games, but recently I've had more success by keeping it smaller, a snapshot of the database seems to be just fine , especially with the number of hits and LDs'. A 10 or 15 draw database gets me far more excited than draws that occurred 2 years ago. The small amount of draws allow me to connect with the flow of the numbers, in effect I see the randomness of the numbers happening. Of course there are those who combine short and longterm data to produce their selections , but I'm starting to question this premise. This idea arose last draw when I was the only player who selected 34 to hit. It of course didn't this time , but it had hit 6 times in the last 10 draws, hottest number in the last 10 and it was shunned. It's in my picks again this draw for sure, as a DN. I feel you have to play them when they're hitting or you're throwing your money away. For example 9/12 numbers in the dancing set have hit in the past 5 draws, triggering interest in the set. Credible thinking says several hits here is quite possible, but we've only used 5 draws to point the way to this set. Does anyone share these thoughts or am I going to win it alone.
Having said that...Very often some announcers are telling us to play numbers that using only hot or cold criterias wouldn't even be taken into considerations...And very often they hit...I remember about 3 years ago I once said to Beaker that I was sure about 5 numbers hitting in the very next draw... 3 of these numbers were not Hot numbers from the last 10 draws 5 of them hit as predicted...Beaker who also have hit for 5 that year(2 times actually) also played some numbers if my memory is correct that were not the hottest in last 10 draws...Same for Goswinus that also hit for 5+bonus...Both ways are good the missing link is always the hardest to find...
Dennis Bassboss
Member
I agree !I will target the red ones...I don't think that 11-12 is ready to go but 35 sure is...Karnac said:
Karnac,
10 to 15 or so draws back should be enuf to spot the hots. I think I've observed that ... more than 5 or 6, and definitely no more than 8, hits in a hot streak, R rare. After that they are done. (This for hot nmbrs only (not prime rib, or burgers, etc.
) After all, they can't stay hot forever. If #42 hits again that will be 8 hits - rare but not impossible. I think #42 is done, and we might squeeze one more out of #34, but I personally wouldn't bet on it. Besides, time for tide to turn to more 
ones.
10 to 15 or so draws back should be enuf to spot the hots. I think I've observed that ... more than 5 or 6, and definitely no more than 8, hits in a hot streak, R rare. After that they are done. (This for hot nmbrs only (not prime rib, or burgers, etc.
) After all, they can't stay hot forever. If #42 hits again that will be 8 hits - rare but not impossible. I think #42 is done, and we might squeeze one more out of #34, but I personally wouldn't bet on it. Besides, time for tide to turn to more ones.Dennis Bassboss said:I agree !I will target the red ones...I don't think that 11-12 is ready to go but 35 sure is...
Here's another instance .
... you targeted the 35 with the 44-45 but passed over the 8 which has hit 4/6 draws with the 44-45 present. wouldn't the 8 be a better play than the 35 or at least both of them....I'm not 2nd guessing you but logic dictates play them all, n'est pas? Dennis Bassboss
Member
08 and 12 are dancing numbers....Karnac said:Here's another instance .
mirage said:Karnac,
10 to 15 or so draws back should be enuf to spot the hots. I think I've observed that ... more than 5 or 6, and definitely no more than 8, hits in a hot streak, R rare. After that they are done. (This for hot nmbrs only (not prime rib, or burgers, etc.
Mirage,
The last time 34 had an extended hot streak 2049-2070 it hit 10 times....over the years I've been burned too many times by giving up on a number when I shouldn't...they have to skip 3 before I turn away
Thats when it hits on the fourthKarnac said:Mirage,
The last time 34 had an extended hot streak 2049-2070 it hit 10 times....over the years I've been burned too many times by giving up on a number when I shouldn't...they have to skip 3 before I turn away
look at your signature, it says the past is the prophet of the future.