Dennis Bassboss
Member
I also like the 45 a lot....and with the 45 This draw could go very high...If it does make sure to have a few from LDs 07 in your set ...



Quite right buddy...This could spoiled the best of any set...But I have a hunch that at least no numbers under 10 could come...Beaker said:Tell you something else that has been hiding under blankets - 2-decade miss![]()
That could really spoil things![]()
The other decade to miss is harder to find... 

One thing remain...the lower 40s might hit for a triple consecutive...Pradeep said:First 01 04 11 13 15 17 30 30 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 04 11 11 13 13
Second 42 35 35 36 48 38 38 46 08 21 34 36 09 36 43 27 40 42 34 42



Well that 4 hitting is like an alarm bell - no low numbersDennis Bassboss said:Quite right buddy...This could spoiled the best of any set...But I have a hunch that at least no numbers under 10 could come...The other decade to miss is harder to find...
![]()


Dennis Bassboss said:This is what I thought.....That 42 has been hiding behind the blanket in the latests draws...This number could be ready for the big...big...blow..![]()
![]()
GoodDennis Bassboss said:Got to go now...But I'll be back soon armed with stats..and hints...![]()
![]()

Beaker said:
20-30-40
Don't be surprised to see that 20 as the first number![]()

I like that 40 alot.vagany said:I am thinking about that 10-30-40... I would put 40 in the first place. I am not too sure about that 20. We'll see I guess![]()
27 is interestingMaggie said:There's nothing really standing out for me in the 20's for Wednesday, except for the 20 by itself.


Maggie said:There's nothing really standing out for me in the 20's for Wednesday, except for the 20 by itself.
Beaker said:27 is interesting![]()
Go to watch for that 23 also
With so many (5) of these 20's as long-shots they could spoil
![]()

