Feb 12 Piks

D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Karnac said:
649
Set 1
05 06 07 31 32 35
05 06 07 26 37 43
05 06 07 36 43 46
05 06 07 30 35 46
05 06 07 23 28 32
01 05 06 07 23 32
05 06 07 30 31 46
01 05 06 07 28 38
05 06 07 26 36 37
05 06 07 23 32 38

Set 2
05 07 31 06 41 43
05 07 31 18 21 46
05 07 31 18 30 46
05 07 31 18 38 46
05 07 31 21 30 38

Set 3
05 06 07 31 32 34
05 06 07 43 46 47
31 32 34 43 46 47
Click to expand...
4 hitters here ..and could have been much more... Congrats ..great stuff! :agree: :agree2: :agree2:
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Nick Koutras said:
Sorry for not answering the question sooner
but here is my knowledge on the matter.

Most of the times ( I do not have exact figures, but ~80%+ )
the next draw is a combination of numbers from the Best & Worst sets.

I have seen that using the BPS of the last 30 draws
and with settings of 2-4 hits
and of size 12-14
gives the best starting set for the next Draw.

For example:
Last CAN 649 draw
Best Set of 12 numbers was:
020516172630353637404348
with Total Hits for the last 30 Draws of
2=18
3=9
Total of 27 Draws with 2+ Hits


It had 4 Hits...



The sets below were of equal value to the above (same number of Total Hits=27)
5 9 16 17 26 30 35 36 37 40 43 48
5 14 16 17 26 30 35 36 37 40 43 48
5 16 17 26 30 31 35 36 37 40 43 48
5 16 17 26 30 35 36 37 40 43 45 48
2 5 17 26 30 34 35 36 37 40 43 48
2 5 15 16 26 30 35 36 37 40 43 48
2 5 16 20 26 30 35 36 37 40 43 48
2 5 16 26 30 31 35 36 37 40 43 48
2 5 8 16 17 26 30 35 36 37 40 48
2 5 16 17 18 26 30 35 36 37 40 48
2 5 16 17 26 27 30 35 36 37 40 48
2 5 16 17 26 29 30 35 36 37 40 48
2 5 16 17 26 30 35 36 37 40 45 48
2 3 5 16 17 26 30 35 36 37 43 48
2 5 16 17 18 26 30 35 36 37 43 48
2 5 16 17 20 26 30 35 36 37 43 48
2 5 16 17 26 27 30 35 36 37 43 48
2 5 16 17 26 29 30 35 36 37 43 48
2 5 16 17 26 30 31 35 36 37 43 48
2 5 15 16 17 26 30 35 36 37 40 43
2 5 16 17 26 27 30 35 36 37 40 43




I hope that this answers your question?
Click to expand...
Now you tell me....this would have hit crazy tonite folks!!!
This is what Nick's stuff will do for you.... :eek: :eek:
 
K

Karnac

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
4 hitters here ..and could have been much more... Congrats ..great stuff! :agree: :agree2: :agree2:
Click to expand...

Thanks Dennis,

Wow look at Nicks' sets.......5+ all over and lots of other prizes too.........I knew there was money in those optimum sets....GillesDs' sets have hit well too.
 
G

gsobier

Member
...yes, 4 hits in those 12 numbers:agree::agree2:...

...sets like this 01 08 14 22 26 29 39 40 47 49:rolleyes: keeps missing the boat:lol:...
Dennis Bassboss said:
:dance1: :dance1: :dance1: :dance1: :dance1: Dance..Dance...Dance...
While some are missing boats... :lol:
Click to expand...
 
M

mirage

Member
Yes, without shadow of a doubt we do better than Q piks. Our record proves that we do. Not just luck.
These are the lines that I actually played (really).
01 16 20 21 27 39
01 16 20 21 27 43
01 27 30 36 37 41
01 04 27 29 30 37
05 20 21 27 30 36
05 16 21 25 30 45
16 21 25 30 35 45
20 27 29 30 37 43
20 26 27 30 37 43

9 lines only $18 bucks. That's all I can approx. afford on a regular basis because of the price hike. The bottom line got me $10. I did actually think of the 12, briefly, because reverse of last draw's 21, but discarded playing it because I had to limit lines played due to affordability. I thought, 37 with 43 again???!-surely not, but played it anyway... good thing I did... I think I've noticed somewhere that 5 likes 12. That's the "dancing set" at work for you, as well as 26 and 43. (Credit - DB - Thank You!!)
Won $30 - 3 lines - on Feb. 9th basically won my money back that time. But, as we all know, we also lose, often, too. It takes a lot of work and patience.

I've been thinking of posting lines here just for the heck of it (sporting bets) and putting my money instead into Ont 649, but this whole process is a lot of work really (for me). Means I would be working at 2 lotteries, (at least). And you tend to work better where your money is invested. The payout for 4 hits in a line in Ont 649 is not as good as the national but it's not bad. I will think about it. Anybody interested in an Ont 649 discussion? Karnac? Anybody?
(Sorry for the rambling...):wavey:
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Follow Snides advices in there...He is quite familiar with that lotto...His expertise should help you out in there...I know that his stats are great...Maybe Karnac also...I'll let him tell you himself..Sure At the present time..It is harder for me to follow many lottos at the same time and having insights for all of them...I'm concentrating on the National for now + Banco..I don't have enough time right now to study that lotto...Like your saying where you invest is where you should put your attention...And you are right..We lose some but we also win some...
How about that Nick best sets :eek: for yesterday?
Following one conversation I had lately with Hot4...I keep scratching my head for not playing one of these lines yesterday... :agree: :agree2:
 
M

mirage

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
Follow Snides advices in there...He is quite familiar with that lotto...His expertise should help you out in there...I know that his stats are great...Maybe Karnac also...I'll let him tell you himself..Sure At the present time..It is harder for me to follow many lottos at the same time and having insights for all of them...I'm concentrating on the National for now + Banco..I don't have enough time right now to study that lotto...Like your saying where you invest is where you should put your attention...And you are right..We lose some but we also win some...
How about that Nick best sets :eek: for yesterday?
Following one conversation I had lately with Hot4...I keep scratching my head for not playing one of these lines yesterday... :agree: :agree2:
Click to expand...

Thanks for the advice Dennis. I will follow up with Snides.
Yes, Nick's best set was great. But to play that would have been too big a risk of $$$ and I would have had to go hunting and picking through his numbers anyway. I have to go with my own hunches. His set was impressive. I will take (another)look at Nicks work. Before I found it information overload but maybe will be easier now. This is from Lottostatistics? Which I have. But which settings or type of number generator used are not stated? How do you know which to use?
That's too bad about Hot4...
Right now a bit nervous because feel it (those spidery's) riding close.. Can continue discussion in Feb. 16 thread maybe...
Thanks again! :agree:
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Lottostatistics...Many settings are good....Got to put the settings according to the trends in numbers...Longer or shorter history...But sticking with it is the key...
Like a boxer..you might take many shots on the mouth until you deliver a knockout punch...This is one way of achieving success... :agree: :agree2:
 
Beaker

Beaker

Member
Nick Koutras said:
Sorry for not answering the question sooner
but here is my knowledge on the matter.

Most of the times ( I do not have exact figures, but ~80%+ )
the next draw is a combination of numbers from the Best & Worst sets.

I have seen that using the BPS of the last 30 draws
and with settings of 2-4 hits
and of size 12-14
gives the best starting set for the next Draw.

For example:
Last CAN 649 draw
Best Set of 12 numbers was:
020516172630353637404348
with Total Hits for the last 30 Draws of
2=18
3=9
Total of 27 Draws with 2+ Hits


It had 4 Hits...
<snip>
Click to expand...


:eek: :eek:

Patience patience patience

Hope someone read this ...... and played it :agree2:

Nice work Nick - all your hard work just paid BIG

Congratulations to all that hit here - some great calls on the boards for this one :agree2:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sidebar

Top