Discussions for 6/49 March 8th

LuckyGuess said:
But i got feeling.

LuckyGuess said:
Re: Dennis, 7---17 is what i think about
Beaker, I doubt about 5.
recently the truth is no triple wins

Brad said:
QC49 ... 07-17-19-29-40-48 B44
ON49 ... 07-17-27-29-41-42 B22
BC49 ... 06-26-29-31-41-49 B19


Dennis, look at QC and ON numbers ...

You have great ESP LuckyGuess...But it came up in the Provincial lottos.... :agree2:
 
Last edited:
But do not throw them in the backside of the drawer yet...They are in play...Both of them...And a brand new open pair has arrived...So here's the story we have 3 open pairs and all of them are in the fortys
43-44 from a while back 48-49 and now 45-46...It just adds weight to my numerous posts stating that the next triple consecutives is going to be in the 40s....
:eek2: :eek3:
 

Beaker

Member
Beaker said:
This is what I'm saying, some of these could be 3peat candidates. Like you said, we could get alot of repeaters here. Now, the question is what might 3peat in a few draws??

I'll be watching that 45 :agree2:

One maybe both 34-45
 
Last edited:
Beaker said:
I had a feeling that 45 was going to show - now if ever there was a case for a DN it's now.

I won't miss this one :no:
Also It could be 45-46 How long has it been since both numbers repeated in back to back draws from an open pair formed by consecutives?
I'm looking at 46-47-48...43-44-45...44-45-46..
:agree: :clown:
 

Beaker

Member
Top 3peater between 34 and 45 is .....

34

In fact 34 is in the top 5.


Now before anyone gets upset :baby: , I count individual 3peats within 4peats, 5peats, 6peats...

For example, the 3 hit 5 times in a row between 1817-1821. I count this as 3 3peats.
 

Beaker

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
Also It could be 45-46 How long has it been since both numbers repeated in back to back draws from an open pair formed by consecutives?
I'm looking at 46-47-48...43-44-45...44-45-46..
:agree: :clown:

You could be onto something here :eek:

Something is telling me to look at 1748 - 45 3peated after 23 skips.

BUT, look what else happened in that draw :eek: :eek:

:clown:
 
Beaker said:
Top 3peater between 34 and 45 is .....

34

In fact 34 is in the top 5.


Now before anyone gets upset :baby: , I count individual 3peats within 4peats, 5peats, 6peats...

For example, the 3 hit 5 times in a row between 1817-1821. I count this as 3 3peats.

That should be clear enough for every :baby: ....Interesting because 18-43-45-47 are the numbers that came up the most with 34....in the whole history...
:eek2: :eek3:
 
Beaker said:
You could be onto something here :eek:

Something is telling me to look at 1748 - 45 3peated after 23 skips.

BUT, look what else happened in that draw :eek: :eek:

:clown:
Yes interesting isn't it?... lots of consecutives in the 40s for that one....and 17 to start the show...
 
Dennis Bassboss said:
Also It could be 45-46 How long has it been since both numbers repeated in back to back draws from an open pair formed by consecutives?
I'm looking at 46-47-48...43-44-45...44-45-46..
:agree: :clown:
It happenned only once in this century that a consecutives has repeated in back to back draws... in draws 1958-1959 the open pair involved in these draws was 05-06... :eek:
 
PREDICTION

Birdie is telling me to watch out from 07-10-31-38-44-49 and you could add 22-25-03
I will ask the Old Wolf too then see what he says !!
 
MARCH 8/03 PICS

STILL GOING TO STAY WITH THESE THREE AS MY BASE #'S FOR SAT.DAYS DRAW....

8..31..40.. :notme: I KNOW THEY ARE COMING,AND I'LL BE WAITING FOR THEM..:agree:

# 44 & # 48 WILL BE IN MY FINAL SETS..

EARLY PREDICTIONS....STICK WITH LD'S 08
 
Re: I think #7 will show up

LuckyGuess said:
which is next repeater??19 or 46?? orboth?
These 2 have never repeated on back to back draws as a pair....Both are hot you never know...but for one of them I'll go with 46... :agree:
 
Last edited:
OLD WOLF 0.14

01-05-07-11-23-26-29-32-38-48--> Used 20 draws

01-09-12-15-25-28-29-30-32-38-41--> same as above

01-02-05-24-28-29-32-34-48--> Used 50 draws

Now we go to new Version 4.0

"newversion"--> 01-05-06-12-24-26-28-29-32-34

"NopositionGap"--> 01-05-06-07-12-14-26-29-32-34-48

"Results"--> 01-05-17-25-28-29-32-34-38-41-45

It seems to me that number 1 is hot in both versions as well as #5 and 32...Also there is a concentration of 20's !!! Now I don't set up the stacks to pay attention to overdue numbers but that could be a mistake like for example numbers 10-31 don't exist here at all !!
 

Sidebar

Top