Discussion for 19 th Feb 2003

Re: Re: CALLING THE PRO'S

Beaker said:
OK, just for you. :agree: Remember your buddy Beaker :wavey:

3-7-8-13-14-16-18-28-31-34-40-44

And just to get you going :dancer: guess when the last time these hit for 5 numbers?
1890 and 1891

I might play this :liplick: :eek: :agree2:
It is a very nice set....The clustering type...But I would go for this...just a slight change.....
01-03-08-14-16-18-27-28-31-34-40-44
:agree2:
 
Last edited:

Beaker

Member
28-31-40

Dennis Bassboss said:
It is a very nice set....The clustering type... :agree2:
It's only hit for 4 numbers twice in this century - probably because of that 31 :cold:
I suspect if that 31 hits these numbers may be part of the story. I like this set alot - except for that 31 :dang:

You're right, its a good clustering set :agree2:
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: Re: CALLING THE PRO'S

Dennis Bassboss said:
It is a very nice set....The clustering type...But I would go for this...just a slight change.....
01-03-08-14-16-18-27-28-31-34-40-44
:agree2:
Take a look at this one Beaker!!! :lol:
 

Beaker

Member
Re: Re: Re: Re: CALLING THE PRO'S

Dennis Bassboss said:
Take a look at this one Beaker!!! :lol:
Yup, that's a good one too :agree2: I agree with you about that 1 or 2 - might see them - as you know that 1 clusters.

The other good one is replace the 8 with 48 in the 28-31-40 set :agree2:
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: CALLING THE PRO'S

Beaker said:
Yup, that's a good one too :agree2: I agree with you about that 1 or 2 - might see them - as you know that 1 clusters.

The other good one is replace the 8 with 48 in the 28-31-40 set :agree2:

THAT IS ANOTHER SET IM DRAFTING UP ....

2-13-28-38-40-48.. :eek: :yes:
 
Re: Re: CALLING THE PRO'S

Beaker said:
OK, just for you. :agree: Remember your buddy Beaker :wavey:

3-7-8-13-14-16-18-28-31-34-40-44

And just to get you going :dancer: guess when the last time these hit for 5 numbers?
1890 and 1891

I might play this :liplick: :eek: :agree2:

I HAVE THE GUEST LIST READY FOR MY BLOOR ST.DEBUT....AND :yes: YOU ARE ON IT
 
One thing is sure the 43-44-45 and 47 are more dangerous than ever now.... :agree:
We could see the 01 and the 10 once more also....even if I considers the 10 as a long shot... :agree:
 

Lin Shen

Member
No numbers over 33 for Feb19

I agree with that No. 3 will be a repeater on Feb.19, all 6 balls will continue to go down, there will be no balls to fall over 33.

the first ball will be falling to 2, the second ball will be falling to 3, the six ball will be at 27.
 

Beaker

Member
Re: No numbers over 33 for Feb19

Lin Shen said:
I agree with that No. 3 will be a repeater on Feb.19, all 6 balls will continue to go down, there will be no balls to fall over 33.

the first ball will be falling to 2, the second ball will be falling to 3, the six ball will be at 27.
I see that 2-3 in one of my lists also - 2-3-8

Ummmm nothing over 33 - got to check that one out. I see a few 40's hitting for this one :agree: I have a feeling this one might go high :eek:
 

Maggie

Member
RE: the lower digits. I like the 2-4, but the 1-6-7 are starting to materialize also. That's where my problem lies, I'm thinking of getting rid of my 16-19 and replacing them with two from the 1-6-7 possibly. The 17-18 is o'er the hill too.
I'm in the same boat as Florie, too many numbers.:confused: I guess it'll be sink or swim for us. :)
 
Some inform about sum

min: 68
max:247
most:
Sum NumberOfSum
142 34
143 33
153 30
152 29
172 29
161 28
165 28
150 27
141 27
126 26
148 26
149 26
158 26
146 25
151 25
171 25
155 24
180 24
128 24
167 23
163 23
159 23
154 23
147 23
139 23
170 22
156 22
136 22
138 22
140 21
135 21
175 21
169 21
160 21
157 21
164 20
176 20
120 20
181 20
182 20
121 20
----------------------------
most range: 120-----182: 1340/1990=67.3%
 

Beaker

Member
Re: Some inform about sum

LuckyGuess said:
min: 68
max:247
most:
Sum NumberOfSum
142 34
143 33
<<all this nice data snipped>>
----------------------------
most range: 120-----182: 1340/1990=67.3%
With or without bonus LuckyG?
 

Sidebar

Top