Discussion about Best Performance Set Trial

hot4

Member
Irvin,

you don't want to add more sets. OK.

I'll wait for those of savagegoose. If needed I'll post one or two more with a bigger amount of draws +-100.

I think it's good to put more sets in trial, to check if updating the database every draw and making a new BPS, can be better or not.

Frank
 

hot4

Member
Heres my picks,

Will stick with these for 5 draws started at 2051.

Set C:

6, 11, 13, 17, 22, 29, 32, 34, 35, 42, 46, 47

Set D:

2, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 16, 18, 25, 27, 33

I noticed with earlier tests that picks seem good for 5 draws.

Regards,

Irvin.
It seems you expect 4 or more in next 5 draws, is it so?

Frank
 

Irvin

Member
Frank,

I'll post 2 new sets for each draw and then keep an eye on each set for 5 draws.

What is the last draw so I can get my database upto date then list my next lot of picks.

Regards,

Irvin

PS. I'll try a few with different duration levels;

Duration = 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100.

Anly lower duration did not work too will.
 

hot4

Member
Irvin said:
Frank,

I'll post 2 new sets for each draw and then keep an eye on each set for 5 draws.

What is the last draw so I can get my database upto date then list my next lot of picks.

Regards,

Irvin

<snip>
Draw #2051: 06-11-13-30-31-37/ 34
Draw #2052: 01-06-23-35-36-39/ 18

Frank
 

Irvin

Member
Thanks for the database update Frank.

Yes I am looking for 4+ for next 5 draws.

Would be good if we can get it to happen on a regular basis.

Will its 2am Monday morning here so i'm off to bed.

well post picks from database with 2051 draws and 2052 draws. So I owe you 4 sets.

Regards,

Irvin
 

hot4

Member
Irvin said:
Thanks for the database update Frank.

:sleeping: Yes I am looking for 4+ for next 5 draws.:sleeping:

:sleeping:Would be good if we can get it to happen on a regular basis.:sleeping:

Will its 2am Monday morning here so i'm off to bed.:sleeping:

well post picks from database with 2051 draws and 2052 draws. So I owe you 4 sets.

Regards,

Irvin
:wavey: Good dreams :wavey:
 

savagegoose

Member
im meant to post some sets?

for me picking 10 or 15 or 18 numbers is the easy part. its paying for an effective wheel that turns them into a winning ticket is the expensive part.

just lemme know what im meant to be posting and i'll run a test or 2.
 

hot4

Member
savagegoose said:
im meant to post some sets?

for me picking 10 or 15 or 18 numbers is the easy part. its paying for an effective wheel that turns them into a winning ticket is the expensive part.

just lemme know what im meant to be posting and i'll run a test or 2.

If you get two groups of 12 numbers by means of LottoStatistics- Best Performance Set button with some configurations you want to try, it would be fine.

Here we are not *picking* by ourselves, just trying to discover the best configurations.

With the set, post the configurations too: duration, categories, trials, ...

Frank
 

hot4

Member
savagegoose,

Canadian Lotto 6/49 database is the focus of this trial. We agreed to get sets of 12 numbers. Can you make them for Canadian lotto?

Irvin,

I'd like to put your sets (from E to H) in the first post (from set A to H) but now it's impossible to edit that post.

They are *in trial* too but it would be good if you clarify the last draw used to each one.

In results, this seems to be a good format to show hits :

SET E: 1, 6, 7, 14, 15, 21, 27, 31, 37, 41, 46, 48 (_,3,

SET F: 2, 4, 7, 13, 15, 16, 17, 23, 25, 29, 44, 47 (_,4,

where _ means that this set was not in test in the first draw. If we pretend to test each set during 5 draws, at the end we'll have the first group e.g.:

SET A: a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l (1,2,4,0,2)

and the last e.g.:

SET ??: a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l (_,_,_,_,_,0,1,2,4,3)

Frank
 
Last edited:
Top