Did GameBelgium said that he is testing a system that has a lot of success ???

F

FunkyCatSpangky

Member
Did GameBelgium said that he is testing a system that has a lot of success ???

I was wondering how his tests are going ???

Anyone knows how to contact him to see if he has a great system going on ???

:dog:

Thanks

Spangky
 
G

GameBelgium

Member
Hi FunkyCatSpring

Yes, I was testing a system that was succesful in a way, it gave great results in trapping the winning numbers together. However, the 'system' generated too many numbers to economically allow lotto players to actually play all those numbers. I used the Gail Howard chart 7 to compare which numbers were common in the Top 14 numbers drawn for 54, 36 and 18 drawings (example, I used LOTS and lots of different settings). Then I did the same for the Bottom 14 numbers. And the same for the 14 numbers in between. Yes, the results were great, but it was not uncommon to have 30+ numbers to play... It's only logical to be able to trap the winning numbers in your selection if your selections consists of 30+ numbers.

In short: I may have been a little over enthusiastic when I was first starting to test the new 'system'. Anyway, I won't give up, I'll keep searching for a better way to play the lotto! :beer:
 
bloubul

bloubul

Member
Hi GameBelgium

I agree with you, 30+ numbers is not on. We must get it below 15 numbers, and I will play 6if6 462 lines with ease. But as you pionted out it is a battle.

BlouBul :cool:
 
F

FunkyCatSpangky

Member
GameBelgium said:
Hi FunkyCatSpring

Yes, I was testing a system that was succesful in a way, it gave great results in trapping the winning numbers together. However, the 'system' generated too many numbers to economically allow lotto players to actually play all those numbers. I used the Gail Howard chart 7 to compare which numbers were common in the Top 14 numbers drawn for 54, 36 and 18 drawings (example, I used LOTS and lots of different settings). Then I did the same for the Bottom 14 numbers. And the same for the 14 numbers in between. Yes, the results were great, but it was not uncommon to have 30+ numbers to play... It's only logical to be able to trap the winning numbers in your selection if your selections consists of 30+ numbers.

In short: I may have been a little over enthusiastic when I was first starting to test the new 'system'. Anyway, I won't give up, I'll keep searching for a better way to play the lotto! :beer:
Click to expand...

Dear GameBelgium,

Out of all the systems out there on the internet ...

Which one would you recommend ?

:)

Thanks

Fall Cat
 
bloubul

bloubul

Member
Hi Fall Cat

Did you not read the rules of this BB. NO PERSONAL INFO. PLEASE DELETE YOUR EMAIL.

BlouBul :cool:
 
G

GameBelgium

Member
FunkyCatSpangky said:
Dear GameBelgium,

Out of all the systems out there on the internet ...

Which one would you recommend ?

:)

Thanks

Fall Cat
Click to expand...

Honestly, very few systems available on the WWW deliver what they promise! I've heard some very good comments on Stefan's systems (http://www.lottotrix.com/) and he is one of the few persons who does not guarantee you will win the lottery using his system. At least he's honest about it, which gives him a mile high advantage over the rest! The system also delivers what it promises: a significant improvement of the odds.

I read a lot of crap on lottery and lottery systems and believe me: there is a lot of crap on the WWW. I wouldn't believe all the testimonials if I were you. On the other hand: if enough people buy a system, one of them is bound to hit the jackpot with it. Whether or not this is due to sheer luck or using the system is another question. In short: I'd rather search for a system to play the lotto myself than to rely on any system being sold online.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sidebar

Top