Defining Consistency....

[Dennis Bassboss]

Recently one member raised an interesting question...
Saying that
''we have to show consistency''
Well I had to step back and I had a deep reflection on this matter...Here's my conclusion...
It depends a lot about what your goal is....In fact there are 2 possibilities..

1-...For myself...Lets take 6/49 ...Since my goal is to win the jackpot I don't have to hit on these 3 or 4 hitters anymore or on all these lower hits categories...(though I still can hit these at times)
I have builded a way to hit big for sure at least once a year on average... bases on a 3 years spread cycle...
For me that is consistency...
My more advanced announcers theory not shared yet on this board with anyone is achieving this...

2-If your goal is to win something every month than you have to hit often for these lower prizes in order to claim consistency... I followed that path with a lot of succes in the past but not anymore
Why you will ask?
The reason is simple IF I do so very often I might go for some choices or numbers that will altered choice number 1...
So I could hit for 3 or 4 but miss that 6 hitters because I went with the easy way out of hitting for 3 or 4 numbers...

So consistency is a relative data here...
I don't mind missing target 100 draws or more in a row if on the 101 draw or more I hit the jackpot...And nothing is ramdom about that
I will predict you this...My numbers will hit hard at one point on this board!

 

[gsobier]

Dennis:

I think you need to have the ability to nail something lets say once a month to have a hope to win it all. One without the other does not make sense.

There are many ways to arrive at a winning set... ...announcers is part of it... ...I've been working with quads and even quints against the entire population of 14M sets (this is all I'll tell you)... ...some results are very interesting because those hitter are at the top of the list and the other 2 are at the other end when conditions are very good. Somewhere in my reports in every draw, 4 hits in 9 or 10 numbers can be found... ...locating it is tricky... ...it is possible.

Before you even get started trying to code a program to do this... ...you must exploit a technique to reduce processing time... ...instead of more than 12 hours, you need to get it done in 1 hour.

Here is an example output from 2148...
46█ 000200616
30█ 000182184
36 000179035
32 000163159
47 000162657
33 000156443
39█ 000156443
31█ 000151611
44 000132894
41 000116600
43 000109815
20 000109815
04 000107820
26 000103598
08 000102612
42 000102242
34≡ 000101337
27 000096981
10 000093623
35 000074679
40 000074679
09 000074679
38 000070719
16 000070719
45 000070719
07 000070719
01 000065591
17 000065591
12 000065591
03 000064820
23 000064820
11 000050628
05 000050490
49 000050490
18 000050471
25 000050039
21 000049547

28█ 000019663
24 000019663
22 000019663
29 000019663
19 000019663
37█ 000019663
15 000019663
14 000019663
13 000019663
06 000019663
48 000019663
02 000019663

Regards,
George

Recently one member raised an interesting question...
Saying that
''we have to show consistency''
Well I had to step back and I had a deep reflection on this matter...Here's my conclusion...
It depends a lot about what your goal is....In fact there are 2 possibilities..

1-...For myself...Lets take 6/49 ...Since my goal is to win the jackpot I don't have to hit on these 3 or 4 hitters anymore or on all these lower hits categories...(though I still can hit these at times)
I have builded a way to hit big for sure at least once a year on average... bases on a 3 years spread cycle...
For me that is consistency...
My more advanced announcers theory not shared yet on this board with anyone is achieving this...

2-If your goal is to win something every month than you have to hit often for these lower prizes in order to claim consistency... I followed that path with a lot of succes in the past but not anymore
Why you will ask?
The reason is simple IF I do so very often I might go for some choices or numbers that will altered choice number 1...
So I could hit for 3 or 4 but miss that 6 hitters because I went with the easy way out of hitting for 3 or 4 numbers...

So consistency is a relative data here...
I don't mind missing target 100 draws or more in a row if on the 101 draw or more I hit the jackpot...And nothing is ramdom about that
I will predict you this...My numbers will hit hard at one point on this board!

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

George good luck to you...I will no longer address you or Peter on this board or elsewhere...It is going nowhere...
I'm looking for improvement and neither of you two can help me doing this...
You should do fine anyways even with my absence in your chat room in the longer run... I gave you what it takes...As for your processing...You don't know anything about the toys or stuff that I have now...
Quints and quads...LOL...I had them for ages now...I even remember providing them to you...
So stop addressing me I won't respond to any of you two...I have not responded to many folks lately.....And this will continu.....

 

[gsobier]

Dennis:

So be it. With that kind of attitude I will never share anything more than the standard report I post every week. Those fortunate players on my list get to see much more. There is something those announcer reports provide which you will never know. It looks like every draw has 4 hitters close together when you know how to get the results... ...doesn't get better than that... ...fishing for the other 2 is part of the challenge for .

You really have no clue what I've been able to do with quads and quints. How you ASSuME I'm doing what you did which fails to work.

The same Good Luck to you, you give to those who play Quick Picks.

Don't bother answering, as a matter of fact, you are not allowed to reply.

Regards,
George

George good luck to you...I will no longer address you or Peter on this board or elsewhere...It is going nowhere...
I'm looking for improvement and neither of you two can help me doing this...
You should do fine anyways even with my absence in your chat room in the longer run... I gave you what it takes...As for your processing...You don't know anything about the toys or stuff that I have now...
Quints and quads...LOL...I had them for ages now...I even remember providing them to you...
So stop addressing me I won't respond to any of you two...I have not responded to many folks lately.....And this will continu.....

 

[tomtom]

Ok…here is a serious talk about a sure JP, and that’s nice. Hope one day somebody might post a strategy for a silly 60% - 70% confident money return.

 

[gsobier]

TomTom:

Nothing is as good as 60%. I have found a way to isolate 3,4, and even 5 numbers in 10 numbers. The challenge is to identify/find/select it. Its mostly hit and miss and how big your wallet is... ...I get 49 lists of 10 numbers each and one of them is real good and another list of about 10 where 1 or 2 hits are hiding. Its tons of work to do all this. If you make the correct choice and play it right, it could be right out of nowhere. After all that, there are many things which could go wrong along the way like a very high or low draw which was not expected.

Regards,
George

Ok…here is a serious talk about a sure JP, and that’s nice. Hope one day somebody might post a strategy for a silly 60% - 70% confident money return.

 

[tomtom]

TomTom:

Nothing is as good as 60%.

This one of the most sensible statements I’ve found at this forum so far.

 

[gsobier]

...hey, its the truth... ...there are ways to and things you can do to get better results than Quick Picks some of the time... ...I just need 2 more to my collection... ...5+ and 6...

This one of the most sensible statements I’ve found at this forum so far.

 

[tomtom]

Sure, there might exist virtual ways. But considering the tickets prices there is not too much space for experiments and the ways look pretty narrow….
Well, that is not the point. From time to time here at the forum might appear a post claiming easy JP possibilities, and at the same time undervaluing any other money return. That’s OK only if that underestimation follows a proof or at least a hint that any reasonable money return(60, or even 50%) is fairly uncomplicated to accomplish. Otherwise, the post might seem both silly and a bit rude…considering the fact that a sure 3/6 wheel consists of 163 lines which brings 10/163 * 2 = 3% sure return.

However, wish you at least 5+ soon..

 

[gsobier]

TomTom:

Thanks... ...you might get one yourself. Mind you, 5 is rare, 5+ or 6 is really tough... ...you never know.

To pull off something, many things have to go your way... ...4 hitters in one list of 10 numbers and 2 in another list of 10 would not fit in a typical wheel most players would use. You could also decide to wheel 10 numbers and collect many 4 hitters.

There is a catch to all of this first, select 4 hitters in 10 numbers and 2 in the other one first, not easy to do.

None of this is easy when you start putting some effort into this stuff.

Regards,
George

Sure, there might exist virtual ways. But considering the tickets prices there is not too much space for experiments and the ways look pretty narrow….
Well, that is not the point. From time to time here at the forum might appear a post claiming easy JP possibilities, and at the same time undervaluing any other money return. That’s OK only if that underestimation follows a proof or at least a hint that any reasonable money return(60, or even 50%) is fairly uncomplicated to accomplish. Otherwise, the post might seem both silly and a bit rude…considering the fact that a sure 3/6 wheel consists of 163 lines which brings 10/163 * 2 = 3% sure return.

However, wish you at least 5+ soon..

 

[tomtom]

Well, any effort always brings something, either bad or good... I suppose that you probably were thinking about all possibilities , but presume that one of your 4 hitters might turn sometimes ( for example once in 5-6 draws) into 5 hitters, that might mean 5+ is not that far. Also, consider that once in 10-15 draws these 4 hitters might turn into 6 hitters…and that looks like a good trap, with much less combinations and without hunting for the two hitters..

However, asking somebody to reveal possible winning strategy would be quite rude…

Therefore

 

[gsobier]

TomTom:

Oh, don't worry, there are many here who share, even post what they are playing.

In a nut shell, selecting the correct numbers is the most important. Almost as important is how to put them together.

It looks like you have the basics... ...some use 12 numbers, some play 15, and some go with 20. 20 is the limit... ...any more than that is almost like Quick Picks.

Regards,
George

Well, any effort always brings something, either bad or good... I suppose that you probably were thinking about all possibilities , but presume that one of your 4 hitters might turn sometimes ( for example once in 5-6 draws) into 5 hitters, that might mean 5+ is not that far. Also, consider that once in 10-15 draws these 4 hitters might turn into 6 hitters…and that looks like a good trap, with much less combinations and without hunting for the two hitters..

However, asking somebody to reveal possible winning strategy would be quite rude…

Therefore

 

[tomtom]

20 is the limit... ...any more than that is almost like Quick Picks.

Well, thanks for the hint.