Hello Heminen!
It's a pleasure to have your posting to my thread after a long pass!!. I was wondering for not to have your useful feedback about the performance of my 'top 18' & 'top 9' for French Lotto!.
You may be knowing that after a great struggle with a macro in my excel worksheet where I built the logic to sqeeze a combination and with the help of GillesD I could run the macro and get the result. But, it's toooooo big a combination numbers running more than 1000 betlines which no one can afford to have.
So, in the last 3-4 days I was breaking my mind (not head) to systemise to give a top betline of 100 possible combinations with a minimum gurantee for a 3 or 4 match! Yesterday I get a flash in my mind to build the logics to garner 100 betlines for any lotto game.
As usual, I tried this one for my favourite lotto game SIKKIM SUPER...not completed....a single shot..which took me more than 8 hours for a complete analysis and mapping.
After completing the generation of 100 betlines, I did check up with the past results....Wow..the last 50 draws ...my top100 betlines contain a minimum 3 match and more than 40 cases there's a 5 match and I'm waiting for a future draw..that is on tomorrow. If it clicks, I'll adopt the same theory to French lotto and post it for you. And your posting asking me to see the new system to crack a jackpot is a mere coincidence, I think.
Final comment: After completing the top100 lines for my favourite game sikkim lotto, there's an another sparkling to generate a top100 betlines(2nd)
with alternative combintions with the performance of numbers in percentile. Just, I'm working on that and I hope tonight I'll end up with another 100 combinations. After checking with the results, I'll judge which one is edge over another but I'll guess both of them will perform equally. So, at last I've come to a conclusion that to hit a jackpot one has to atleast play a minimum of 100 betlines for every draw with the suggested 'top100' betlines predicted.
Sorry! I bored you much.
Bye
LM649