Dennis Bassboss
Member
I see I am sorry...I tought that this was good for a discussion on all kinds of projections...I now realized that it would have been better in the discussion thread...Sorry my mistake!hot4 said:
Best Performing Set - Draw 20-09-03
- Thread starter hot4
- Start date
Has anyone had a close look at the test results I posted in the tool Box section?
If you look carefully you will notice one of the BPS I put there had a 6 number hit (5+B)
It is listed with the draw number that it hit on.
Picks from draw 2016 to 2045.
Test picks on draw 2046 to 2050.
1st group Result draw 2047 - 5+B
2nd group Result draw 2046 - 5nos, 2047 - 4nos, 2050 - 4nos
Regards,
Irvin.
Best Performing Set for CAN 649 between Draws 2016 to 2045
Wins 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Times Better than Average
Expected 1.9 7 10.2 7.4 2.9 0.6 0.1 0
Observed This Time 3 8 9 3 6 1 1.1
Best Observed 2 7 8 4 9 2.2
Trial 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
2000 1 4 5 6 16 18 19 21 22 27 31 40 41 45 48
Best So Far 4 9 11 13 14 15 17 18 22 23 26 33 37 38 46
6nos - 2047
Best Performing Set for CAN 649 between Draws 2016 to 2045
Wins 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Times Better than Average
Expected 1.9 7 10.2 7.4 2.9 0.6 0.1 0
Observed This Time 10 8 7 1 4 0
Best Observed 4 1 8 16 1 1.2
Trial 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
2000 1 3 7 10 15 16 22 26 27 35 36 37 40 41 46
Best So Far 6 9 13 14 18 20 21 24 26 27 37 38 45 47 49 5n
os - 2046
4nos - 2047
4nos - 2050
If you look carefully you will notice one of the BPS I put there had a 6 number hit (5+B)
It is listed with the draw number that it hit on.
Picks from draw 2016 to 2045.
Test picks on draw 2046 to 2050.
1st group Result draw 2047 - 5+B
2nd group Result draw 2046 - 5nos, 2047 - 4nos, 2050 - 4nos
Regards,
Irvin.
Best Performing Set for CAN 649 between Draws 2016 to 2045
Wins 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Times Better than Average
Expected 1.9 7 10.2 7.4 2.9 0.6 0.1 0
Observed This Time 3 8 9 3 6 1 1.1
Best Observed 2 7 8 4 9 2.2
Trial 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
2000 1 4 5 6 16 18 19 21 22 27 31 40 41 45 48
Best So Far 4 9 11 13 14 15 17 18 22 23 26 33 37 38 46
6nos - 2047
Best Performing Set for CAN 649 between Draws 2016 to 2045
Wins 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Times Better than Average
Expected 1.9 7 10.2 7.4 2.9 0.6 0.1 0
Observed This Time 10 8 7 1 4 0
Best Observed 4 1 8 16 1 1.2
Trial 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
2000 1 3 7 10 15 16 22 26 27 35 36 37 40 41 46
Best So Far 6 9 13 14 18 20 21 24 26 27 37 38 45 47 49 5n
os - 2046
4nos - 2047
4nos - 2050
Last edited:
Heres a suggestion.
We have 2 threads in Lotto649. One titled "LOTTOSTATISTICS BPS draw 2051 to 2060"
In this one just list the 12 numbers the duration, trials, and the best observed Nothing else.
This will make it easier for everyone to follow number picks.
For the second Thread "LOTTOSTATISTICS Discussion for draw 20##"
And if you want to do back testing we should list that in the tool box section.
Regards,
Irvin.
We have 2 threads in Lotto649. One titled "LOTTOSTATISTICS BPS draw 2051 to 2060"
In this one just list the 12 numbers the duration, trials, and the best observed Nothing else.
This will make it easier for everyone to follow number picks.
For the second Thread "LOTTOSTATISTICS Discussion for draw 20##"
And if you want to do back testing we should list that in the tool box section.
Regards,
Irvin.
Irvin said:
Irvin,
I presume that you got these two groups of 12 numbers to test them during this trial.
It would be good if you post : Number of draws, last draw (2051?), categories (3?) , Better than Average ...
I tried to get 2 groups with different configurations from yours you have post in the Test Results thread, and different in the number of trials between both.
Frank
Nick Koutras
Member
Some Ideas & Analysis on the BPS
Instated of finding one BPS for
a certain Duration I looked for a BPS in
a range of Draws and for intervals of 15 draws
(chosen arbitrarily that 15)
So I looked for BPS for 3 intervals
of 15 draws for the following ranges
and settings.
Start Draw Duration Set Size Categories Trials
2051 15 5 22 3333
That test gave the following set of 5 numbers: 6,7,13,23,33
Start Draw Duration Set Size Categories Trials
2036 15 5 22 3333
That test gave the following set of 5 numbers:4,8,13,21,35
Start Draw Duration Set Size Categories Trials
2021 15 5 22 3333
That test gave the following set of 5 numbers:6,20,29,33,39
Total selected numbers were:11 as follows:
4,6,8,13,20,21,23,29,33,35,39
This set had 4 correct numbers in 11!!!!!!!!
6,23,35,39
So, I'm revising /adding an option to BPS to
include the "interval" option for such Output.
I hope this post is clear. It seems to me that is very important.
Instated of finding one BPS for
a certain Duration I looked for a BPS in
a range of Draws and for intervals of 15 draws
(chosen arbitrarily that 15)
So I looked for BPS for 3 intervals
of 15 draws for the following ranges
and settings.
Start Draw Duration Set Size Categories Trials
2051 15 5 22 3333
That test gave the following set of 5 numbers: 6,7,13,23,33
Start Draw Duration Set Size Categories Trials
2036 15 5 22 3333
That test gave the following set of 5 numbers:4,8,13,21,35
Start Draw Duration Set Size Categories Trials
2021 15 5 22 3333
That test gave the following set of 5 numbers:6,20,29,33,39
Total selected numbers were:11 as follows:
4,6,8,13,20,21,23,29,33,35,39
This set had 4 correct numbers in 11!!!!!!!!
6,23,35,39
So, I'm revising /adding an option to BPS to
include the "interval" option for such Output.
I hope this post is clear. It seems to me that is very important.
Nick Koutras
Member
Brad said:
Hi Brad,
First the 3333 Trials.
For a small Set, like the one I used,
( 5 number Set ) the trials can be less.
The 3333 is a matter of computer speed.
My system is running @ 2.58 GHz.
The 4 out of 11, is not something that can
happen constantly.
The results are always verifiable by others.
Re: Some Ideas & Analysis on the BPS
Very clear and very important too. 4 in 11 are expected 1 in 60 draws!!
We must look future hits of this group too, however I'll not put it in the trial thread.
When will it hit 4 again? I don't think this happened by chance or because you tried and tried until meeting such group.
What can happen is that the groups of pairs of last 45 draws, are more prone to join 1 in ?? draws and ?? being < 60.
I'll make another group (using the same method) to see when it will hit 4.
Frank
Nick Koutras said:
Very clear and very important too. 4 in 11 are expected 1 in 60 draws!!
We must look future hits of this group too, however I'll not put it in the trial thread.
When will it hit 4 again? I don't think this happened by chance or because you tried and tried until meeting such group.
What can happen is that the groups of pairs of last 45 draws, are more prone to join 1 in ?? draws and ?? being < 60.
I'll make another group (using the same method) to see when it will hit 4.
Frank