6/49 Discussion For October 29, 2003

[Dennis Bassboss]

But keep in mind that when the bonus draws are held the announcers saddly lose a lot of their significances...

 

[Beaker]

Also keep in mind that the 49 is an excellent announcer for 42-23 and 31 all of this is for single announcers....

I've been watching for that 23 also - since we have seen the 17 recently. I like it

 

[martek]

Interesting stats Martek but the most obvious stats of all is the 49 announced 49 a total of 62 times...and that should fill a position...Interesting to notice that the 09 was announced 49 times by 49....

Is that 62 times including the bonus? According to my stats 49 announced itself only 42 times (excluding the bonus).

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

Is that 62 times including the bonus? According to my stats 49 announced itself only 42 times (excluding the bonus).

Yes Beaker with bonus included obviously...I think it is better to use them with bonus included and I will tell you why....Because of the pairings that you can build after..

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

Or it might be even better to use both stats following this reasonning... But nothing beats the double announcers...

 

[martek]

Or it might be even better to use both stats following this reasonning... But nothing beats the double announcers...

Double announcers as in a pair announcing another pair or another number?

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

Double announcers as in a pair announcing another pair or another number?

Single,pairs,group of numbers you name it...It is awesome very often...And it shows the way...But there's a twist to hit you have to look at history within history in order to find the real gems... In other words you have to look at the actual context and at what it was once...

 

[luckyhorse]

dennis so far i have 49-42-23-31 as your favorite numbers for next draw what about these that you posted 6-12-13-15-16-25-26-46-47 will you be posting a surefire set once again???? i will be looking forward to it

 

[Beaker]

Re: Power Function

Some Cyclical comparisons on the Can 6/49 game.

Based on appearances between 50 Cycles (Long) and 15 Cycles (Sort)

Nick, can you do 30 cycles and post the results?

 

[Beaker]

Re: Re: Power Function

Nick, can you do 30 cycles and post the results?

I don't know how this got posted earlier - could be headed for a crash here

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

dennis so far i have 49-42-23-31 as your favorite numbers for next draw what about these that you posted 6-12-13-15-16-25-26-46-47 will you be posting a surefire set once again???? i will be looking forward to it

I won't do it in 6/49 this time again....I will stick to my long term set...Because of the bonus draws....these numbers previously posted are being study ... I saw a few hits for them using my normal approach...but I'm not ready to say that this is where I will go...I put them here to cross references with the others here in the hope that one of us will spot something for these...often in the past by doing so whether it is Beaker,Peter or someone else...(I like players like Market being involved like he is now...) we were able to catch more numbers by exchanging our thouhts...
Usually I make a final decision only after looking at all my things often I do not have the time to look at everything and I miss target because of it...But when I put the big load..I don't miss very often...The proof of that is my Super 7 runs lately...I have put all my thinking on that lotto and you saw the results by yourself...It has increased my chances there...We still are getting burn by some draws it is impossible to see all the extreme shifts in the draws in advance but I do believe that we can and we have spotted a lot of them so far...

 

[Nick Koutras]

Power Function

Some Cyclical comparisons on the Can 6/49 game.

Based on appearances between 50 Cycles (Long) and 15 Cycles (Sort)
the following are noticeable based on some power function.



NB Power
37 7.6
06 6.8
38 6.2
15 6.0
21 5.7
26 5.4
49 5.2
16 5.1
32 5.0
07 4.8
08 4.5
47 3.9
45 3.6
05 3.6
48 3.5
33 3.4
30 3.0
29 2.8
13 2.7
46 2.3
11 2.1
34 1.8
04 1.6
12 1.3
14 0.5
35 0.0
01 -0.1
44 -0.8
41 -0.8
22 -0.9
40 -1.0
19 -1.0
02 -1.1
24 -1.2
18 -1.2
10 -1.2
20 -1.4
28 -1.4
39 -1.5
31 -1.7
25 -2.3
23 -2.9
03 -2.9
36 -3.1
27 -3.2
09 -4.7
43 -5.7
17 -6.2
42 -9.5

The above can be used to select
your numbers based on that function.

The greater the Power is the more
probable the numbers shall be, based
on the duration of the analysis.

 

[Nick Koutras]

Nick this look interesting...Do you have some backtesting on this?

I have problems posting.

The clocks between my computer and the
Server are not synchronized and I can not post.

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

Some Cyclical comparisons on the Can 6/49 game.

Based on appearances between 50 Cycles (Long) and 15 Cycles (Sort)
the following are noticeable based on some power function.



NB Power
37 7.6
06 6.8
38 6.2
15 6.0
21 5.7
26 5.4
49 5.2
16 5.1
32 5.0
07 4.8
08 4.5
47 3.9
45 3.6
05 3.6
48 3.5
33 3.4
30 3.0
29 2.8
13 2.7
46 2.3
11 2.1
34 1.8
04 1.6
12 1.3
14 0.5
35 0.0
01 -0.1
44 -0.8
41 -0.8
22 -0.9
40 -1.0
19 -1.0
02 -1.1
24 -1.2
18 -1.2
10 -1.2
20 -1.4
28 -1.4
39 -1.5
31 -1.7
25 -2.3
23 -2.9
03 -2.9
36 -3.1
27 -3.2
09 -4.7
43 -5.7
17 -6.2
42 -9.5

The above can be used to select
your numbers based on that function.

The greater the Power is the more
probable the numbers shall be, based
on the duration of the analysis.

Nick this look interesting...Do you have some backtesting on this?

 

[gsobier]

Nick:

I could not agree more... ...how many would 5 or 6 numbers be in this list, in lets say, 30 numbers consistently? I'm just trying to get an idea of how reliable before using it.

Regards,
George

Nick this look interesting...Do you have some backtesting on this?

 

[martek]

Nick, how is this power function calculated? Or is it top secret?
I'd like to help out with backtesting and crunch some data for us all to see how reliable this is.

 

[martek]

If Nick's list is up-to-date, then 6 of the 7 numbers in the last draw are all in the upper half of the list, except for 19 who is at -1.0. I'm just wondering how reliable this is at catching a majority of the drawn numbers.

 

[Nick Koutras]

Re: Re: Power Function

Nick, can you do 30 cycles and post the results?

Here is the Power Ratings for
30 Long & 10 Sort

16 9.6
11 9.3
37 9.3
49 7.4
13 6.2
32 6.1
17 5.2
06 4.4
45 4.4
47 3.7
05 3.4
35 3.2
41 2.9
33 2.9
07 2.5
26 2.4
38 2.4
21 2.2
15 1.9
29 1.7
25 1.5
18 1.5
30 1.4
20 1.1
46 0.8
12 0.2
19 0.0
27 -0.1
34 -0.3
09 -0.6
08 -0.7
03 -0.9
48 -1.0
14 -1.4
10 -1.7
44 -2.0
23 -2.9
22 -3.2
01 -3.5
24 -3.5
04 -3.9
40 -4.1
31 -4.1
39 -4.9
28 -5.7
36 -6.1
43 -6.2
02 -6.6
42 -7.4

 

[Nick Koutras]

Nick, how is this power function calculated? Or is it top secret?
I'd like to help out with backtesting and crunch some data for us all to see how reliable this is.

There is not any secret here.

Step 1. Calculate the Average & SD
for the Long Cycle

Step 2. Calculate the Average & SD for the Sort Cycle

Step 3. Calculate the Upper Limit of the Graph using 1 Standard Deviation for both cases.

Step 4. Calculate the Difference between Sort & Long Cycles.

Step 4 is the answer of the Power Rating.


We could use different confidence levels but for this kind
of analysis one Standard Deviation is sufficient.

 

[martek]

There is not any secret here.

Step 1. Calculate the Average & SD
for the Long Cycle

Step 2. Calculate the Average & SD for the Sort Cycle

Step 3. Calculate the Upper Limit of the Graph using 1 Standard Deviation for both cases.

Step 4. Calculate the Difference between Sort & Long Cycles.

Step 4 is the answer of the Power Rating.


We could use different confidence levels but for this kind
of analysis one Standard Deviation is sufficient.

A little vague. Average of what? And what is a Long Cycle and a Sort Cycle?
But most importantly, have you done any backtesting yourself? Is it reliable?
If not, then this is as good as pulling numbers out of a hat.