6/49 Discussion For October 27, 2004

Karnac

Member
peter said:
These two numbers also go well with my triple repeat numbers,
so two reasons really.
And one last point, I looked at how many times the 8 announces both the 7 and 9.:agree:

Thanks Peter ...I was just wondering why .....they show well in my forecast,...but the 2 3 4 are right up there too so I was curious as to your selection process. The 27 and 28 are most frequent and show repeatedly , as well as 14 15 16. The 44 45 46 also very dominant.:devil:
 
Karnac said:
Thanks Peter ...I was just wondering why .....they show well in my forecast,...but the 2 3 4 are right up there too so I was curious as to your selection process. The 27 and 28 are most frequent and show repeatedly , as well as 14 15 16. The 44 45 46 also very dominant.:devil:
I'm also starting to really like that 15-16....
One more thing here...Do not forget that 02-03 open pair...By the way the 02 has been announced by the 08 only 27 times in the entire history....
:eek3: :eek2:
 

gsobier

Member
Dennis:

There is no sign on 02 in announcers. If it hits, it was one of the ones not listed. Also, the favorite place of mine in announcers had been very quiet for many draws, this won't last.

Regards,
George:)
Dennis Bassboss said:
I'm also starting to really like that 15-16....
One more thing here...Do not forget that 02-03 open pair...By the way the 02 has been announced by the 08 only 27 times in the entire history....
:eek3: :eek2:
 

Karnac

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
I'm also starting to really like that 15 and 16....
One more thing here...Do not forget that 02-03 open pair...By the way the 02 has been announced by the 08 only 27 times in the entire history....
:eek3: :eek2:

Dennis ....I have the 2 and 4 appearing 8 times each and the 3 appearing on 7 occasions out of a possible 36 draws when following 13-43.The 15-16 appeared 8 times each also......the 15-16 pair appearing in the first two positions has occurred often and lends credence to Beakers' suspicion of a high draw.:devil:

One other point Dennis........did you observe how many of those Decade Companions I posted had prime numbers as their results....I am just stunned that so many of the companion numbers are primes..WHY?..in fact can someone tell me if this is normal or is it an anomaly we should be pursuing. What should be normal? 14 24 42 44 have no decade companions that are prime, on the other hand 29 has 4 of them. I think we should concentrate on exploiting this. If it can add 1 or 2 numbers to our picks each draw our $:cow:$ could be here in time for Xmas:santa::xmas:
 

gsobier

Member
...another reason why every set I play have at least one prime:D...
Karnac said:
...did you observe how many of those Decade Companions I posted had prime numbers as their results....I am just stunned that so many of the companion numbers are primes...
 

gsobier

Member
Karnac:

There are 15 of them... ...you are bound to have at least one because there are so many... ...the only question all the time is, which one(s):notme:.

Regards,
George:)
Karnac said:
Agreed George...it's the frequency of them appearing that has me sitting up....why primes?:eek:
 
gsobier said:
Karnac:

There are 15 of them... ...you are bound to have at least one because there are so many... ...the only question all the time is, which one(s):notme:.

Regards,
George:)
I always look at the :dance1: set the same way you look at primes... :agree: :agree2:
 

gsobier

Member
Dennis:

There are 3 more primes so a complete miss is not as likely than the :dance1: set... ...we discussed this and more earlier before.

Regards,
George:)
Dennis Bassboss said:
I always look at the :dance1: set the same way you look at primes... :agree: :agree2:
 

Beaker

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
I'm also starting to really like that 15-16....
One more thing here...Do not forget that 02-03 open pair...By the way the 02 has been announced by the 08 only 27 times in the entire history....
:eek3: :eek2:
That 16 is definitely in the mix. :agree:

If you consider that 13 likes 10-16-19 a few of those might drop also.

That 15-16 is worth a look :eek: :agree:
 

gsobier

Member
Beaker:

From what I see, 15 and 16 hitting together is not too likely... ...I'd look at others for DNs instead.

Regards,
George:)
Beaker said:
That 16 is definitely in the mix. :agree:

If you consider that 13 likes 10-16-19 a few of those might drop also.

That 15-16 is worth a look :eek: :agree:
 
Beaker said:
That 16 is definitely in the mix. :agree:

If you consider that 13 likes 10-16-19 a few of those might drop also.

That 15-16 is worth a look :eek: :agree:
I'm playing that 19-20 for sure aleady in my set...I'll check on that triple 10-16-19....
I like that 15-16 a lot...
40 is coming right up...If not 42 will hit...
That 26 is also already in my picks...
:agree: :agree2:
Lets get ready to rumble!!! :kaioken: :kaioken: :liplick: :pimp: :smash:
 
Dennis Bassboss said:
Now here are some real gems....These numbers have not hit together in the last 200 draws...
19-42
19-41
20-27
19-48
16-42
16-40
18-25
17-33
22-28
36-48
36-40
47-48
38-43
22-43
22-42
28-42
28-36
16-17
05-39
04-42
08-32
06-28
02-22
02-08
04-17
02-45
08-39
12-42
12-33
15-35
13-22
10-17
09-42
10-48
10-22
:agree: :agree2:
Here's where the others are... :agree: :clown: :agree2: :eek:
 

gsobier

Member
Dennis:

Here is something I'm looking at... ...05 07 08 12 22 23 36 44 should yield one or more... ...not more than four though.

Regards,
George:)
Dennis Bassboss said:
I'm playing that 19-20 for sure aleady in my set...I'll check on that triple 10-16-19....
I like that 15-16 a lot...
40 is coming right up...If not 42 will hit...
That 26 is also already in my picks...
:agree: :agree2:
Lets get ready to rumble!!! :kaioken: :kaioken: :liplick: :pimp: :smash:
 
gsobier said:
Dennis:

There are 3 more primes so a complete miss is not as likely than the :dance1: set... ...we discussed this and more earlier before.

Regards,
George:)
That's my point George I proved you wrong on this many times...The 3 more numbers in the primes set look pale when you add the 3 best announced or the 3 hottest numbers to that dancing set draw after draw...
There you are static set against dynamic set...Always on the prawl...
:agree: :agree2:
 
gsobier said:
Dennis:

Here is something I'm looking at... ...05 07 08 12 22 23 36 44 should yield one or more... ...not more than four though.

Regards,
George:)
The 05 is on the radar ...The 12 also...45 is another one that is about to drop...But 26 is a big...big ..hanging ghost... :agree:
 
One more little detail...My unmatched Lds thingy is very high for LDs of 06..
48% of chances to hit
second is LDs of 04 45% of chances
Major=
16-26
06-16
04-34
Minor=

16-46
34-44
:agree: :agree2:
 

gsobier

Member
...it would be something if 05 and 12 hit:eek:... ...I have my reasons:D... ...I dunno about 26... ...could be a spoiler:notme:... ...gotta draw the line somewhere...
Dennis Bassboss said:
The 05 is on the radar ...The 12 also...45 is another one that is about to drop...But 26 is a big...big ..hanging ghost... :agree:
 
Dennis Bassboss said:
I'm playing that 19-20 for sure aleady in my set...I'll check on that triple 10-16-19....
I like that 15-16 a lot...
40 is coming right up...If not 42 will hit...
That 26 is also already in my picks...
:agree: :agree2:
Lets get ready to rumble!!! :kaioken: :kaioken: :liplick: :pimp: :smash:
O:K:...O:K:...I wont hide it from you 39 is also in my picks... :agree:
 

Sidebar

Top