6/49 Discussion For October 23, 2004

[Dennis Bassboss]

The 31 is certainly regaining strink lately...Certain numbers never lose certain habits...

 

[tomtom]

TomTom
what makes you say that there will be no consecutives this draw.
last draw had a double consective, when this happens, history shows that it is followed up with consecutives in the next draw.
Last time we had a draw with a double consecutive was draw 2151, it was followed up in 2152 with a quad and a double consecutive.

Well, also it seems that is a good time for a draw with at least 4 decades occupied and more than 4/2 or 2/4 odd/even …that's kind of pretty overdue...

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

For you who do not follow trends as closely as some of us do, not to long ago Dennis spoke of a draw happening soon, that will start in the twenties(2161), and it came to be.
Not long ago, I spoke of a draw (7) numbers of a total sum total of under 100, last one was 1871.
The low ones are lining up for this great event to take place, and I for one will not miss the train.

That low draw is now on the radar for sure...As you say many hot ones in the low spectrum lining up ...I agree....

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

I will post more stats later...especially that positionning stuff...It is haunting me....

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

When looking back at the last 30 draws....The 08 has not come up in first position at all and it is the only number under 10 that has not come....When looking for the numbers under 20...There are 5 numbers counting the 08..That have not strike in first position....
08-11-14-16-17
Watch out for these on that list.... Of course these are obtained looking at the 7 positions instead of the misleading 6 positions....

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

Now when looking back at the seventh position 4 numbers have not strike in that position in the 40s in the last 30 draws...40-41-44-45
In the 30s for that same position only 5 numbers have yet to strike in that seventh position
30-31-32-33-34
So if you expect a low draw consider these highly...Again here ...Of course these are obtained looking at the 7 positions instead of the misleading 6 positions....

 

[Beaker]

When looking back at the last 30 draws....The 08 has not come up in first position at all and it is the only number under 10 that has not come....When looking for the numbers under 20...There are 5 numbers counting the 08..That have not strike in first position....
08-11-14-16-17
Watch out for these on that list.... Of course these are obtained looking at the 7 positions instead of the misleading 6 positions....

That 8 me.

One of those 20+ skippers is due 8-41with 25 on deck

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

That 8 me.

One of those 20+ skippers is due 8-41with 25 on deck

Especially when looking at LDs of 08 status...LDs last 30 draws status..
LDS/hits
03 = 28
06 = 26
09 = 23
01 = 22
02 = 20
07 = 20
00 = 19
05 = 19
04 = 18
08 = 15

 

[peter]

The question I always ask myself is
If it's overdue, does that mean it is due.
I hope you follow the thought.

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

That 2150 up to 2157 draws streaks should scare the pants off everybody here...I see our good frieng the 26 hanging ghost in there ...And quite a few others of these ....

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

I'm going to call it here Casper the friendly ghost is coming to the show...

 

[Beaker]

The question I always ask myself is
If it's overdue, does that mean it is due.
I hope you follow the thought.

Peter, I never usually chase these super-long shots - been my strategy for ever.

Having said that, I have been playing 41 because of Beaker's Law. 14 has hit again so it is back on the radar.

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

Peter, I never usually chase these super-long shots - been my strategy for ever.

Having said that, I have been playing 41 because of Beaker's Law. 14 has hit again so it is back on the radar.

One thing is sure one of this bunch will hit....

 

[gsobier]

Beaker:

It might work out... ...I've done a good check at the reversal of a number for the next draw... ...most of the time, its not too reliable at face value.

Regards,
George

Peter, I never usually chase these super-long shots - been my strategy for ever.

Having said that, I have been playing 41 because of Beaker's Law. 14 has hit again so it is back on the radar.

 

[peter]

Anybody have stats on each number that is reversible on how many times one of the twins shows up in the next draw.

 

[gsobier]

Peter:

Send me an e-Mail... ...I've sent to you and I get an error every time... ...I've written that program to report on this long ago. Better yet, meet me in the VIP lounge.

Regards,
George

Anybody have stats on each number that is reversible on how many times one of the twins shows up in the next draw.

 

[nipsirc]

I will definately play 1,2,3,4,21 on a five number combo for this one, and if only 3 hit, so what, that will be $700 bucks. should 4 hit, I'm smiling all the way to the bank.
As Beaker says"Big Risk= Big reward" and thats how it should be.

This would be a very costly mistake !!! I can see it coming !!!

 

[nipsirc]

inCredible sources says that 8 34 37 41 are coming home to mama this saturday!!!

 

[Beaker]

Anybody have stats on each number that is reversible on how many times one of the twins shows up in the next draw.

The 'Law' states within 4 draws.

 

[Beaker]

Beaker:

It might work out... ...I've done a good check at the reversal of a number for the next draw... ...most of the time, its not too reliable at face value.

Regards,
George

George, you didn't get the specs correct.

Check it out for the next draw, +2, +3 and +4.