Dennis Bassboss
Member
°°
° °
° °
° °
°° ennis will hit hard!
6/49 Discussion For October 02, 2004
- Thread starter gsobier
- Start date
°°
° °
° °
° °
°° ennis will hit hard!
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Better start preparing the bells and whistles folks!!! 
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Stop responding and paying attention to my posts Sheba I don't want to know anything from you or what you think just leave me alone... You can't know how or what I think! Get off my posts... 
Dennis Bassboss
Member
I like them!Pradeep said:
luckystrike said:I'M PRETTY SURE THAT I WILL BE USING THREE DN'S FOR THIS DRAW......20..43..44..
BUT I ALSO HAVE A FEELING THAT TWO OR THREE #'S FROM S-7 WILL CARRY OVER TO 6/49 THIS SATURDAY.......IT'S IN THE GUT....
You are right about the S-7 numbers coming up on this Lotto 6-49 draw tonight. 26 would be one of them.
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Same for you George....Stop referring to me in your posts...Put me on ignore...I don't want to have anything to do with or about you ...Just leave me alone....I never turned my back on my friends..But the opposite is true...All the ones that should have shut up at one point instead of posting deregatory comments will suffer the same fate...Asgsobier said:Peter:
This could be worth a try... ...that special set of 26 numbers you have posted on your computer (related to that set of 6 numbers which hit for 4 which I play everyhelped with (before he decided to turn his back on some friends)
could be in play
Choose the correct 10 or 12 and it could happen. Just don't bet the farm
Regards,
George
simple as that...
Peter:
Ok, deal. When I get some outstanding work completed, I'll start posting some gems here when its too late to play... ..you will get them ahead of time via special delivery.
A word about 16, if my data is on the money, it won't hit.
On second thought, there is nothing here of any value most of the time the way I see it... ...I was thinking of not bothering to post my chart... ...since this would punish other players, I'll keep posting it... ...the only exception to value are things like WD's rodent friend... ...the Lottery Police might come looking for him.
Regards,
George
Ok, deal. When I get some outstanding work completed, I'll start posting some gems
here when its too late to play... ..you will get them ahead of time via special delivery.A word about 16, if my data is on the money, it won't hit.
On second thought, there is nothing here of any value
most of the time the way I see it... ...I was thinking of not bothering to post my chart... ...since this would punish other players, I'll keep posting it... ...the only exception to value are things like WD's rodent friend... ...the Lottery Police might come looking for him.Regards,
George
peter said:
Last edited:
gsobier said:Peter:
Ok, deal. When I get some outstanding work completed, I'll start posting some gems
A word about 16, if my data is on the money, it won't hit.
On second thought, there is nothing here of any value
Regards,
George
Thanks for keeping your charts posted, I know many people that use them..
Sheba..
Dennis Bassboss
Member
You just don't get it....Stop referring to me...Have a life....
Get off my posts!!!
Get off my posts!!!
Dennis Bassboss
Member
...I'm nowhere near complete with this yet (work still in progress)... ...I have the following from my little collecting program for this draw: (ignore the hitters from the last draw being at the top due to data I have used)...
I have NO idea
what we will see.
I supose you could use this to rank the Repeaters too.
34 000032752 (ignore)
14 000032557 (ignore)
27 000030248 (ignore)
36 000030191 (ignore)
10 000029804 (ignore)
26 000026181 (ignore)
41 000017333
31 000016882
12 000014913 (ignore)
45 000013807
17 000013763
18 000013715
19 000013630
49 000013609
11 000013136
15 000012744
21 000012506
25 000012315
22 000012056
20 000011223
43 000011049
13 000010097
48 000010010
39 000009875
30 000009683
28 000009334
05 000009170
32 000009030
03 000008902
40 000008865
02 000008737
23 000008115
06 000007882
29 000007837
09 000007782
08 000007356
07 000007080
38 000006720
04 000006716
47 000006631
35 000006197
16 000005741
01 000005253
37 000005127
42 000004936
24 000004809
46 000004696
44 000004559
33 000004384
I have NO idea
what we will see.I supose you could use this to rank the Repeaters too.
34 000032752 (ignore)
14 000032557 (ignore)
27 000030248 (ignore)
36 000030191 (ignore)
10 000029804 (ignore)
26 000026181 (ignore)
41 000017333
31 000016882
12 000014913 (ignore)
45 000013807
17 000013763
18 000013715
19 000013630
49 000013609
11 000013136
15 000012744
21 000012506
25 000012315
22 000012056
20 000011223
43 000011049
13 000010097
48 000010010
39 000009875
30 000009683
28 000009334
05 000009170
32 000009030
03 000008902
40 000008865
02 000008737
23 000008115
06 000007882
29 000007837
09 000007782
08 000007356
07 000007080
38 000006720
04 000006716
47 000006631
35 000006197
16 000005741
01 000005253
37 000005127
42 000004936
24 000004809
46 000004696
44 000004559
33 000004384
...hum, VERY interesting... ...there is a pattern here which Peter has seen before in earlier work I've done... ...2 DNs from repeaters were ranked high, sweet! We should expect to see no hitters right at the bottom... ...part way up is the hitting zone. The position 48 is in bothers me, too diffucult to locate it
... ...there is always one problem child in every draw... ...some adjustments might clear this up. This pattern no no fluke, I see something like this most of the time. Instead of repeaters, hits should be near them when they are not repeaters because of the way I've done this (provided there are no errors in the limits I have set)..
... ...2 DNs from repeaters were ranked high, sweet! We should expect to see no hitters right at the bottom... ...part way up is the hitting zone. The position 48 is in bothers me, too diffucult to locate it... ...there is always one problem child in every draw... ...some adjustments might clear this up. This pattern no no fluke, I see something like this most of the time. Instead of repeaters, hits should be near them when they are not repeaters because of the way I've done this (provided there are no errors in the limits I have set)..gsobier said:...I'm nowhere near complete with this yet (work still in progress)... ...I have the following from my little collecting program for this draw: (ignore the hitters from the last draw being at the top due to data I have used)...
I have NO idea
I supose you could use this to rank the Repeaters too.
34 000032752 (ignore)
14 000032557 (ignore)
27 000030248 (ignore)
36 000030191 (ignore)
10 000029804 (ignore)
26 000026181 (ignore)
41 000017333
31 000016882
12 000014913 (ignore)
45 000013807
17 000013763
18 000013715
19 000013630
49 000013609
11 000013136
15 000012744
21 000012506
25 000012315
22 000012056
20 000011223
43 000011049
13 000010097
48 000010010
39 000009875
30 000009683
28 000009334
05 000009170
32 000009030
03 000008902
40 000008865
02 000008737
23 000008115
06 000007882
29 000007837
09 000007782
08 000007356
07 000007080
38 000006720
04 000006716
47 000006631
35 000006197
16 000005741
01 000005253
37 000005127
42 000004936
24 000004809
46 000004696
44 000004559
33 000004384
Last edited: