6/49 Discussion For May 22, 2004

[peter]

30's are in

 

[peter]

Anyone with some kahuna's want to call a triple consecutive?????
by that I mean 3 pairs of consecutives, I'm looking at 12,13,30,31,and 46,47.

 

[Beaker]

30's are in

Just looking at a few other things here - have to look a little closer but my decade announcer thingy is signalling a wild draw - could be really high or really low. I'll look more closely as time goes on.

We also haven;t had a draw with all decades for 13 draws - normally we get 1/10 so despite our $10 mill draw decade trend we have to consider seeing something from all decades.

Having said that, today I would rank the decades this way - high occurrance to low:

40's
20's
1's
30's
10's

Could change.

 

[Beaker]

Anyone with some kahuna's want to call a triple consecutive?????
by that I mean 3 pairs of consecutives, I'm looking at 12,13,30,31,and 46,47.

could see one from each of those pairs - and you might hit one consecutive - so 4 numbers possible here

 

[Beaker]

A few Quint announcers

1. 1800 = 06 16 17 19 27 30 37
2. 1902 = 15 23 27 35 38 44 46

 

[peter]

Beaker look at 1952 and 1962

 

[Beaker]

Beaker look at 1952 and 1962

Peter,

I wrote some code called 'peters10'

I can see them all now

2112 was a 10 mill - lots of 2's in the 10 mill pot

 

[gsobier]

Peter:

Oh good, now we know there won't be 3 consecutives. Yes, thank you, I got that T-Shirt video, amazing.

I guess you are now promoted to the laundry and folding guru at your place.

Regards,
George

Anyone with some kahuna's want to call a triple consecutive?????
by that I mean 3 pairs of consecutives, I'm looking at 12,13,30,31,and 46,47.

 

[gsobier]

Peter:

Jump? How high?... ...I'll have something in the morning.

Regards,
George

Feel free to jump in George, we need one absoulute bet the mortgage number.

 

[peter]

Peter:
Oh good, now we know there won't be 3 consecutives.
Regards,
George

Now your not suggesting I'm the filter are you?

 

[Beaker]

I dunno Peter

Seeing ALOT of low 1-2-4-7-9

Wonder if 1-49 is on deck

 

[peter]

4 or 9 look good out of that group.

 

[Beaker]

4 or 9 look good out of that group.

You may have been 1 draw early with that play

 

[peter]

But I think you were correct on a high sum total, I'm looking at about 222, I might be wrong, perhaps we could see a double digit for the turd time in a row for 10 mil draws. (as first number)

 

[Beaker]

But I think you were correct on a high sum total, I'm looking at about 222, I might be wrong, perhaps we could see a double digit for the turd time in a row for 10 mil draws.

Well, that is the problem - that high sum is a good stat.

The only way to get that high a sum with those low numbers is an antipode draw.

If you take a look at 1968-1970/1916-1918/1887-1890/1702-1704, these represent areas with similar decade announcer data as the last draw.

 

[gsobier]

Peter:

You know me, always kidding... ...the only thing you can count on is... ...its always a surprise when the results are out.

Ya, who else would it be... ...it was good 'ol me fixing your spelling.

Regards,
George

Now you're not suggesting I'm the filter are you?

 

[gsobier]

Beaker:

I count 01 and 49 as a consecutive pair as in a "wrap around".

Regards,
George

I dunno Peter

Seeing ALOT of low 1-2-4-7-9

Wonder if 1-49 is on deck

 

[peter]

Peter:

You know me, always kidding... ...the only thing you can count on is... ...its always a surprise when the results are out.

Ya, who else would it be... ...it was good 'ol me fixing your spelling.

Regards,
George

thats how us rednecks spell it out here in the west, you easterners can spell it any which way you like.
But you are correct you're = you are

 

[gsobier]

I was put on this earth to correct your spelling.

thats how us rednecks spell it out here in the west, you easterners can spell it any which way you like.
But you are correct you're = you are

 

[peter]