6/49 Discussion For March 20, 2004
- Thread starter gsobier
- Start date
ones that finally came out... Sheba:
2.5 repeaters since 33 was a bonus... ...02 did the cha-cha from regular, to bonus and then back to regular again just a little while ago.
Regards,
George
2.5 repeaters since 33 was a bonus... ...02 did the cha-cha from regular, to bonus and then back to regular again just a little while ago.
Regards,
George
Sheba said:[COLOR=dark red]There were allot of repeters last night... [/COLOR]
Sheba__
~~~ Good Luck!
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
-----------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Re: 7 groups of 4 numbers updated
Guys,
I'm waiting 5 numbers in 28 last 10 draws but it hasn't happened. Meanwhile, the wheel is getting some 3 and 4 hits, but I'm looking for some better hits
gsobier said:Frank:
Nothing is a sure thing... ...this way works and has potential.
Regards,
George
peter said:Well done Frank
Guys,
I'm waiting 5 numbers in 28 last 10 draws but it hasn't happened. Meanwhile, the wheel is getting some 3 and 4 hits, but I'm looking for some better hits
Re: Re: Re: Re: 7 groups of 4 numbers updated
Frank:
I feel a 5 hitter is more probable when there is only one hit in a row. When you allow more than one in a row, the number of sets produced goes sky high... ...this in turn changes the percentage of winners and loosers if you counted them all up.
There are some other things you can do... ...limit prime numbers to 3 and always have 1 as a minimum, a consecutive is a good idea too but not more than 2 consecutives... ...these are tips I got from Beaker which help
.
Regards,
George
Frank:
I feel a 5 hitter is more probable when there is only one hit in a row. When you allow more than one in a row, the number of sets produced goes sky high... ...this in turn changes the percentage of winners and loosers if you counted them all up.
There are some other things you can do... ...limit prime numbers to 3 and always have 1 as a minimum, a consecutive is a good idea too but not more than 2 consecutives... ...these are tips I got from Beaker which help
.Regards,
George
hot4 said:Guys,
I'm waiting 5 numbers in 28 last 10 draws but it hasn't happened. Meanwhile, the wheel is getting some 3 and 4 hits, but I'm looking for some better hits
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 7 groups of 4 numbers updated
Yes George, there's a need to use some filters more. To limit last draw numbers 0-3 is good too. Problem happens if 5-6 numbers appear but one filter fails, like 3 in a row of 4; in such case I'll think: why didn't I played every group of 4 min=3or4 ...
But what I was confident of, some draws ago, was that these kind of groups would hit 5 better than expected
gsobier said:Frank:
I feel a 5 hitter is more probable when there is only one hit in a row. When you allow more than one in a row, the number of sets produced goes sky high... ...this in turn changes the percentage of winners and loosers if you counted them all up.
There are some other things you can do... ...limit prime numbers to 3 and always have 1 as a minimum, a consecutive is a good idea too but not more than 2 consecutives... ...these are tips I got from Beaker which help
Regards,
George
Yes George, there's a need to use some filters more. To limit last draw numbers 0-3 is good too. Problem happens if 5-6 numbers appear but one filter fails, like 3 in a row of 4; in such case I'll think: why didn't I played every group of 4 min=3or4 ...
But what I was confident of, some draws ago, was that these kind of groups would hit 5 better than expected
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 7 groups of 4 numbers updated
Frank:
The first and most critical problem is deciding on the numbers to use. A limit of no more than 3 from the last draw (including the bonus) is a good rule to follow. Playing hide and seek with repeaters can drive you nuts if you keep guessing wrong with them. It looks like you played pretty much all of previous winners for this draw.
A limit of 3 per row makes TONS of sets to choose from.
Regards,
George
Frank:
The first and most critical problem is deciding on the numbers to use. A limit of no more than 3 from the last draw (including the bonus) is a good rule to follow
. Playing hide and seek with repeaters can drive you nuts if you keep guessing wrong with them. It looks like you played pretty much all of previous winners for this draw.A limit of 3 per row makes TONS of sets to choose from.
Regards,
George
hot4 said:Yes George, there's a need to use some filters more. To limit last draw numbers 0-3 is good too. Problem happens if 5-6 numbers appear but one filter fails, like 3 in a row of 4; in such case I'll think: why didn't I played every group of 4 min=3or4 ...
But what I was confident of, some draws ago, was that these kind of groups would hit 5 better than expected
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 7 groups of 4 numbers updated
Till now I've not filtered last draw to 0-3 but as they frequently belong to different groups they will appear at most 3 per line. I think this is what you are calling repeaters. However, sometimes in last discussion thread (24-03-04) some one is using this term for another concept of repeaters, isn't it?
I was thinking to catch those draws which will hit 3 numbers in one group of 4. I know that the odds is small but sometimes it will happen and then it doesn't help to hit 5 in 28!
gsobier said:Frank:
The first and most critical problem is deciding on the numbers to use. A limit of no more than 3 from the last draw (including the bonus) is a good rule to follow
Till now I've not filtered last draw to 0-3 but as they frequently belong to different groups they will appear at most 3 per line. I think this is what you are calling repeaters. However, sometimes in last discussion thread (24-03-04) some one is using this term for another concept of repeaters, isn't it?
A limit of 3 per row makes TONS of sets to choose from.
Regards,
George
I was thinking to catch those draws which will hit 3 numbers in one group of 4. I know that the odds is small but sometimes it will happen and then it doesn't help to hit 5 in 28!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 7 groups of 4 numbers updated
Frank:
Yes, getting a 5 hitter by lucking out on 3 in a row of 4 could do it... ...it all depends on how you make those rows of 4.
Regards,
George
Frank:
Yes, getting a 5 hitter by lucking out on 3 in a row of 4 could do it
... ...it all depends on how you make those rows of 4.Regards,
George
hot4 said:Till now I've not filtered last draw to 0-3 but as they frequently belong to different groups they will appear at most 3 per line. I think this is what you are calling repeaters. However, sometimes in last discussion thread (24-03-04) some one is using this term for another concept of repeaters, isn't it?
I was thinking to catch those draws which will hit 3 numbers in one group of 4. I know that the odds is small but sometimes it will happen and then it doesn't help to hit 5 in 28!